Warren now the most likely nominee according to some betting markets

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Warren also has the plus of being a political woman on her own merits, not that of a related powerful man (or men) like HRC (and Pelosi).

+1. Mad respect for someone who started out in a community college and worked their way up. Rather than having Daddy buy their way into Yale.

Warren didn't make it on her own merits. She lied about being Native American to get ahead. She won't win a national election because of that.

They found that she got no benefit from the native american thing. it is an oklahoma thing to have a family "myth" that you are part native american

btw it wasn't a community college, it was a commuter college - U of Houston. She went there after she gave up her scholarship at GWU to move to Texas with her husband

My bad. Still impressive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Big question: will Warren be able to gain traction outside of her core support of white Dems with high HHI? Seriously?

No! Warren does not appeal to blacks, Asians, and Latinos. Also, besides wealthy white women I do not think white men are very fond of Warren either. I honestly see many minorities and men staying home if Warren is the nominee.

Biden has Obama in his back pocket and he is a white male. He is the only one that I think could beat Trump. However, at the rate Democrats are going Trump will probably win. Trump has charisma like a cult leader and his base is fired up right now. Democrats are loosing people over immigration and Warren's pie in the sky policies.

Warren does not appeal to people outside of her base. She is a smart lady, but she lacks the charisma and down home approach that some Americans are attracted to. Warren basically represents rich, liberal white women. I do not see most Americans (myself included) voting for her. Trump will destroy Warren. Actually, many conservatives are hoping for Warren and Bernie because moderates will jump ship and vote for Trump.

[Anonymous]

I am Asian. She is the only primary candidate I donated to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big question: will Warren be able to gain traction outside of her core support of white Dems with high HHI? Seriously?

No! Warren does not appeal to blacks, Asians, and Latinos. Also, besides wealthy white women I do not think white men are very fond of Warren either. I honestly see many minorities and men staying home if Warren is the nominee.

Biden has Obama in his back pocket and he is a white male. He is the only one that I think could beat Trump. However, at the rate Democrats are going Trump will probably win. Trump has charisma like a cult leader and his base is fired up right now. Democrats are loosing people over immigration and Warren's pie in the sky policies.

Warren does not appeal to people outside of her base. She is a smart lady, but she lacks the charisma and down home approach that some Americans are attracted to. Warren basically represents rich, liberal white women. I do not see most Americans (myself included) voting for her. Trump will destroy Warren. Actually, many conservatives are hoping for Warren and Bernie because moderates will jump ship and vote for Trump.

Interesting. I wonder where her fans see her gaining a lot. I’m particularly interested in larger demographics she might target.

[Anonymous]

Warren is now ahead of Bernie by a nose. Harris is borderline irrelevant after what Gabbard did to her. First primary is almost 6 months away so reading polls is a bit premature IMO.

Biden 30.3%
Warren 18..5%
Bernie 17.5%
Kamala 8.3%

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_pre.38sidential_nomination-6730.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Warren is now ahead of Bernie by a nose. Harris is borderline irrelevant after what Gabbard did to her. First primary is almost 6 months away so reading polls is a bit premature IMO.

Biden 30.3%
Warren 18..5%
Bernie 17.5%
Kamala 8.3%

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_pre.38sidential_nomination-6730.html

national polls are garbage this is going to be decided in the first 4 states

Iowa and NH are what you should be focused on

This is a 5 person race. Everyone else should just drop out

Iowa

Biden 25
Warren 16
Harris 14
Sanders 12
Buttegie 7

NH

Biden 22
Sanders 19
Warren 16
Harris 9
Buteegie 8

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Warren is now ahead of Bernie by a nose. Harris is borderline irrelevant after what Gabbard did to her. First primary is almost 6 months away so reading polls is a bit premature IMO.

Biden 30.3%
Warren 18..5%
Bernie 17.5%
Kamala 8.3%

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_pre.38sidential_nomination-6730.html

national polls are garbage this is going to be decided in the first 4 states

Iowa and NH are what you should be focused on

This is a 5 person race. Everyone else should just drop out

Iowa

Biden 25
Warren 16
Harris 14
Sanders 12
Buttegie 7

NH

Biden 22
Sanders 19
Warren 16
Harris 9
Buteegie 8

Buteegie should also drop out. He’s by far the biggest among billionaires and near the top in Manhattan+DC. Doesn’t sound like the makings of a national politician to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.

...says the funny American who doesn't realize that Warren and Sanders would be communists in any other oecd country, way to the left of the mainstream socialdemocrat parties.

...says the unread American who doesn't realize what true communism means and probably has never read Marx.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Warren also has the plus of being a political woman on her own merits, not that of a related powerful man (or men) like HRC (and Pelosi).

+1. Mad respect for someone who started out in a community college and worked their way up. Rather than having Daddy buy their way into Yale.

Warren didn't make it on her own merits. She lied about being Native American to get ahead. She won't win a national election because of that.

By your standards virtually no one made it by their own merits. I was merely praising her for not getting there by dint of who the men in her life are, something that characterizes HRC and Pelosi.

There’s that winning misogyny we’ve come to expect from the GOP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.

...says the funny American who doesn't realize that Warren and Sanders would be communists in any other oecd country, way to the left of the mainstream socialdemocrat parties.

...says the unread American who doesn't realize what true communism means and probably has never read Marx.

...says the arrogant and clueless American who doesn't realize he's talking with someone from Eastern Europe who spent over a decade in Italy and Germany.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fine.

I have a lot of respect for her, she’s by far the most knowledgeable on the issues. She’s a bit old, but doesn’t show signs of senility like Biden or Sanders.

Yang has the most comprehensive and innovative ideas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big question: will Warren be able to gain traction outside of her core support of white Dems with high HHI? Seriously?

No! Warren does not appeal to blacks, Asians, and Latinos. Also, besides wealthy white women I do not think white men are very fond of Warren either. I honestly see many minorities and men staying home if Warren is the nominee.

Biden has Obama in his back pocket and he is a white male. He is the only one that I think could beat Trump. However, at the rate Democrats are going Trump will probably win. Trump has charisma like a cult leader and his base is fired up right now. Democrats are loosing people over immigration and Warren's pie in the sky policies.

Warren does not appeal to people outside of her base. She is a smart lady, but she lacks the charisma and down home approach that some Americans are attracted to. Warren basically represents rich, liberal white women. I do not see most Americans (myself included) voting for her. Trump will destroy Warren. Actually, many conservatives are hoping for Warren and Bernie because moderates will jump ship and vote for Trump.

Interesting. I wonder where her fans see her gaining a lot. I’m particularly interested in larger demographics she might target.

She’s over achieving among women and rust belt. And she’s doing better than anyone else— even Harris— among AA women I know. Which surprises me too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big question: will Warren be able to gain traction outside of her core support of white Dems with high HHI? Seriously?

No! Warren does not appeal to blacks, Asians, and Latinos. Also, besides wealthy white women I do not think white men are very fond of Warren either. I honestly see many minorities and men staying home if Warren is the nominee.

Biden has Obama in his back pocket and he is a white male. He is the only one that I think could beat Trump. However, at the rate Democrats are going Trump will probably win. Trump has charisma like a cult leader and his base is fired up right now. Democrats are loosing people over immigration and Warren's pie in the sky policies.

Warren does not appeal to people outside of her base. She is a smart lady, but she lacks the charisma and down home approach that some Americans are attracted to. Warren basically represents rich, liberal white women. I do not see most Americans (myself included) voting for her. Trump will destroy Warren. Actually, many conservatives are hoping for Warren and Bernie because moderates will jump ship and vote for Trump.

Interesting. I wonder where her fans see her gaining a lot. I’m particularly interested in larger demographics she might target.

She’s over achieving among women and rust belt. And she’s doing better than anyone else— even Harris— among AA women I know. Which surprises me too.

Pretending to be a native american when she is not to gain unfair advantage to get ahead is a deal breaker.

[Anonymous]

She didn't gain any advantage from that. It is just part of the family history of many people in Oklahoma to think they have native american DNA, which she did

[Anonymous]