So wait, you're an older parent here trolling and don't even have kids in either school system you're making claims about? |
No, tracking groups kids together to appropriately challenge them. The kids at the top are the brightest or advanced, then comes above average, average, below average. Just like letter grades A, B, C etc.. It’s also how the real world works. You can think otherwise but that’s a fact. We are not in a utopia where everyone’s abilities are the same. I don’t have a problem if my child is above average, average, or whatever. If my child is average, he is not going to learn at the same pace as an advance or if you will brightest child. If the majority of the class is average, we all know where most of the teachers time and focus will be directed. Lastly no, from my first hand personal experience, it did not reinforce elitism and privilege. It helped me do better and reach my full potential coming from a poor minority family. |
|
Ive had kids in both.
Wotp is as good ad, and sometimes better, than moco up to grade 3. The dc class sizes are smaller with more extras. After that, the best dc students leave and the teaching is less effective because there is limited differentiation. |
This pretty much sums it up. |
NO, many elementary schools DO NOT differentiate. The top ones do not. I have had 3 kids at Janney (2 alums, 1 there now). They don't differentiate. They teach everyone on one level. Deal will differentiate for math and language. Wilson has "honors for all" for 9th, 10th, and 11th. So one level of classes in those grades now except for for APs. STOP MAKING CRAP UP!!! |
I thought College Gardens was considered white and Asian? |
How long ago were your kids in DC schools? Sounds like quite awhile, as it’s been sometime since kids leave at 3rd grade--this is no longer true in DC for WOTP and some other schools also. |
| I've had kids in both and think that our WOTP school did better than MCPS through 5th - more robust science, social studies and writing, with math and reading on par. MS kid blows through MCPS writing assignments because they are so much easier than what our WOTP school required. Plus, the school had smaller class sizes and more co-teachers making for a lower teacher-student ratio. I do think it DC falls apart in middle and beyond because of the refusal to track and removal of resources from high achieving cohorts in order to bring up the lower achieving ones. |
Please cite your source for that. |
Here is what we have seen EOTP. ECE is OK but majority of parents bail DCPS elementary by 3rd or 4th grade. Capital hill elementary parents may stay till 5th. No one is staying in DCPS for middle. A small number of parents stay to go to Stuart Hobson in Capital Hill. They have honors but it’s not selective or rigorous. All the kids from middle class families get in. No one at all is staying for high school unless they get into the test in high schools. IB curriculum at EOTP middle school is a joke. No one is sending their kids to the middle schools. As to the non test in DCPS high schools, no way is anyone going, and I don’t know what levels they have that you are talking about but even if they do, it’s just for show. No real rigor. Above is the deal. An outlier few families may keep their kid in middle and high school that’s it. Most are not willing to sacrifice their child’s education in a school system that refuses to meet the needs of the higher performing kids. I agree with PP who said potential resources are diverted away from them to close the achievement gap by trying to bring the lower kids up. |
This. Never crossed my mind to move since we live WOTP. DC is in middle school now and doing well. |
Oh and in the elementary schools in Capital Hill, the PTA raises a ton of money to pay for extra aids/teachers to help with some differentiation. I’m sure the schools WOTP does too. It’s not DCPS providing it. But a few extra bodies can only do so much and this is not sustainable in middle school where the academic achievement widens even more. |
I posted that and have a 5th grader who is my 3rd kid to go through this. All the smartest kids left before 4th and 5th. This year in 5th they disnt even bother to differentiate in math and it was a wasted year for DC. |
|
I'm the Janney parent above and there is zero formal differentiation at Janney. My kids did (and do) well with no effort and always get 5's on the PARCC. When we asked about more, it was suggested that they join the lunch time math club. My neighbor's kid is a true prodigy (doing math 5 grades up, etc). The parents had many meetings and were also provided with nothing except for suggestions about the math club and for a few weeks one year their kids was given extra work-sheets. They were far more frustrated than we were because they have a kid who truly needs differentiation and was bored out of his mind (but well behaved because he's a quiet kid) and the school provided nothing year after year. This school is 100% in the business of teaching AT GRADE LEVEL and providing a ton of support for kids who are behind. But zero, nothing for kids who are ahead, even many years ahead.
Maybe it's different across the park where the array of ability is much wider. At a school like Janney, I'd guess you have 75% of kids functioning very easily at grade level. 20% who lag behind in some way and 5% who are ahead. |
In my kids' grades, two kids left in 4th and they were not "the best." Our experience of differentiation was quite good, which is why kids arrive at Deal with 2 and 3 different levels of math in spite of having the exact same teachers in 4th and 5th. And ELA is obviously differentiated in elementary school. |