Any Early Predictions for ISL Next Season?

[Anonymous]

Their draw control and 11-man depth were on great display in the indoor format.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their draw control and 11-man depth were on great display in the indoor format.

Are you kidding? They only won one game. They looked terrible.

[Anonymous]

Vizlax was 2-1 at the same tournament.

[Anonymous]

And BI was 3-1, what’s your point? It’s not like they were all playing the same teams.

[Anonymous]

And, as the pp was trying to point out, indoor rules are different than regular rules and are not reflective of the Spring. Just look at McDonogh’s results at it over the years vs the spring. If you are going to try to throw shade, please be smart enough to not look like a fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The SSSA 21s looked awesome at the Indoor Championships.

Since you are such a huge fan, let everyone know your name, address and school affiliation, I am sure they will get you a signed ball from your game against them last May.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SSSA 21s looked awesome at the Indoor Championships.

Since you are such a huge fan, let everyone know your name, address and school affiliation, I am sure they will get you a signed ball from your game against them last May.

lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And, as the pp was trying to point out, indoor rules are different than regular rules and are not reflective of the Spring. Just look at McDonogh’s results at it over the years vs the spring. If you are going to try to throw shade, please be smart enough to not look like a fool.

If you are going to try and boost your team, please be smart enough not to use a tournament where they only won one game and didn't look good on the draw or anywhere else.

[Anonymous]

Results speak for themselves, but none of the local teams looked exceptional. And all ribbing aside, SSSA and Ireton played in the tougher bracket, as evidenced by the opponents they played advancing the furthest. Visi has no goalie, which is gonna be pretty problematic, and SSSA has limited defense. Its hard to really evaluate the teams when both Ireton and SSSA are missing their all-Americans. Visi is pretty much what it is. Should be competitive between the two top teams again, but wish Stone Ridge would have been there as I think they're gonna be a handful for SSSA and SR will definitely beat Visi.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]Results speak for themselves, but none of the local teams looked exceptional. And all ribbing aside, SSSA and Ireton played in the tougher bracket, as evidenced by the opponents they played advancing the furthest. Visi has no goalie, which is gonna be pretty problematic, and SSSA has limited defense. Its hard to really evaluate the teams when both Ireton and SSSA are missing their all-Americans. Visi is pretty much what it is. Should be competitive between the two top teams again, but wish Stone Ridge would have been there as I think they're gonna be a handful for SSSA and SR will definitely beat Visi.[/quote]

Visi does have a goalie, a sophomore.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Results speak for themselves, but none of the local teams looked exceptional. And all ribbing aside, SSSA and Ireton played in the tougher bracket, as evidenced by the opponents they played advancing the furthest. Visi has no goalie, which is gonna be pretty problematic, and SSSA has limited defense. Its hard to really evaluate the teams when both Ireton and SSSA are missing their all-Americans. Visi is pretty much what it is. Should be competitive between the two top teams again, but wish Stone Ridge would have been there as I think they're gonna be a handful for SSSA and SR will definitely beat Visi.[/quote]

Visi does have a goalie, a sophomore. [/quote]

Wow and really? I don't think anyone thought Visi would be taking the field without a goalie. Are you saying the sophomore is really good?

[Anonymous]

not so much

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, as the pp was trying to point out, indoor rules are different than regular rules and are not reflective of the Spring. Just look at McDonogh’s results at it over the years vs the spring. If you are going to try to throw shade, please be smart enough to not look like a fool.

If you are going to try and boost your team, please be smart enough not to use a tournament where they only won one game and didn't look good on the draw or anywhere else.

Cause their are so many draws in indoor lacrosse?

[Anonymous]

^ + 1

Ha!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, as the pp was trying to point out, indoor rules are different than regular rules and are not reflective of the Spring. Just look at McDonogh’s results at it over the years vs the spring. If you are going to try to throw shade, please be smart enough to not look like a fool.

If you are going to try and boost your team, please be smart enough not to use a tournament where they only won one game and didn't look good on the draw or anywhere else.

Cause their are so many draws in indoor lacrosse?

Well PP seemed to think 2 per game was enough to bring draws into the conversation at 15:00, saying, and I quote, “Their draw control and 11-man depth were on great display in the indoor format.”