Rep Nunes sues Twitter for Anti-Conservative Bias

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Is Twitter trying to interfere in our elections?

It appears so.

+1.

That part is very clear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Is Twitter trying to interfere in our elections?

It appears so.

+1.

That part is very clear.

As is Facebook

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

He and his terrible attorney are risking sanctions and fines with this sh!t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.

Hahahaha, sure. I can't believe you actually think that the political spin is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.

+1

Care to provide some actual facts to back up this latest conspiracy theory? Sandy Hook was real, Seth Rich was not murdered by HRC, Comet Pizza is not the center of a global child sex trafficking ring, Obama is not a secret Kenyan Muslim...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.

That’s been debunked, but keep trying and maybe it’ll stick with your cowpoke flyover friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.

+1

Care to provide some actual facts to back up this latest conspiracy theory? Sandy Hook was real, Seth Rich was not murdered by HRC, Comet Pizza is not the center of a global child sex trafficking ring, Obama is not a secret Kenyan Muslim...

This was back in July. Twitter won't admit to what they are doing, but this only helps Nunes' claim.

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/43paqq/twitter-is-shadow-banning-prominent-republicans-like-the-rnc-chair-and-trump-jrs-spokesman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.

+1

Care to provide some actual facts to back up this latest conspiracy theory? Sandy Hook was real, Seth Rich was not murdered by HRC, Comet Pizza is not the center of a global child sex trafficking ring, Obama is not a secret Kenyan Muslim...

Hey, how come you forgot the biggest and most obvious conspiracy theory of all?

Repeat after me: Americans, not Russians, elected Trump in 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

My God, they weren't autopopulating the drop.down menu. Quelle horror! Death to the algos!
You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.

+1

Care to provide some actual facts to back up this latest conspiracy theory? Sandy Hook was real, Seth Rich was not murdered by HRC, Comet Pizza is not the center of a global child sex trafficking ring, Obama is not a secret Kenyan Muslim...

This was back in July. Twitter won't admit to what they are doing, but this only helps Nunes' claim.

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/43paqq/twitter-is-shadow-banning-prominent-republicans-like-the-rnc-chair-and-trump-jrs-spokesman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare

This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?

You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.

What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?

Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.

+1

Care to provide some actual facts to back up this latest conspiracy theory? Sandy Hook was real, Seth Rich was not murdered by HRC, Comet Pizza is not the center of a global child sex trafficking ring, Obama is not a secret Kenyan Muslim...

Hey, how come you forgot the biggest and most obvious conspiracy theory of all?

Repeat after me: Americans, not Russians, elected Trump in 2016.

It's so cute how you twist your sentence to create a straw man. Nobody thinks the Russians hacked cast ballots. The theory, whicc has been proven and admitted to, is that they used bots and sock puppets to spread targeted disinformation (like you just did) to amplify Trump and encourage people not to vote.