Rep Nunes sues Twitter for Anti-Conservative Bias

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare


This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?


You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.



What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?


Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.


+1


Care to provide some actual facts to back up this latest conspiracy theory? Sandy Hook was real, Seth Rich was not murdered by HRC, Comet Pizza is not the center of a global child sex trafficking ring, Obama is not a secret Kenyan Muslim...


Hey, how come you forgot the biggest and most obvious conspiracy theory of all?

Repeat after me: Americans, not Russians, elected Trump in 2016.


It's so cute how you twist your sentence to create a straw man. Nobody thinks the Russians hacked cast ballots. The theory, whicc has been proven and admitted to, is that they used bots and sock puppets to spread targeted disinformation (like you just did) to amplify Trump and encourage people not to vote.


So?

How does that compare with the $2 billion Hillary had in the bank? With the billions of biased media "reporting" for years?

Whatever the Russians did, it's a nonissue (and if it was an issue, let's investigate the President who enabled it).

The conspiracy theory is that the Russians stole the election --- way crazier and more pernicious that those stupid Kenyan stories.
Anonymous
If Twitter is actually trying to silence conservatives they do a pretty sh*tty job of it
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare


This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?


You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.



What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?


Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.


Hahahaha, sure. I can't believe you actually think that the political spin is true.


dp. Since 2012. Some are the fascists they see...formed in clouds.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If Twitter is actually trying to silence conservatives they do a pretty sh*tty job of it

You haven’t been silenced, have you?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare


This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?


You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.



What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?


Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.


+1


Care to provide some actual facts to back up this latest conspiracy theory? Sandy Hook was real, Seth Rich was not murdered by HRC, Comet Pizza is not the center of a global child sex trafficking ring, Obama is not a secret Kenyan Muslim...


Hey, how come you forgot the biggest and most obvious conspiracy theory of all?

Repeat after me: Americans, not Russians, elected Trump in 2016.


It's so cute how you twist your sentence to create a straw man. Nobody thinks the Russians hacked cast ballots. The theory, whicc has been proven and admitted to, is that they used bots and sock puppets to spread targeted disinformation (like you just did) to amplify Trump and encourage people not to vote.

And they did it on... wait for it... Twitter. And Facebook.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This contains a lot of funny stuff. But what it actually is is a politician attempting to abuse the judicial process in order to scare people out of criticizing him by proving that he can cost them a lot in legal fees.”
- Executive Editor, Lawfare


This is exactly what it is. Nunes need to be dumped by his constituents - but are they smarter than him?


You realize this whole sentence hinges on the word 'criticize', right? There's a reason why that word was used - it attempts to soften what Twitter is doing.



What exactly Twitter is DOING to HIM that it is not DOING to other politicians?


Twitter is allowing systemic abuse by liberals while simultaneously banning and shadow-banning conservatives in order to shape public opinion.


+1


Care to provide some actual facts to back up this latest conspiracy theory? Sandy Hook was real, Seth Rich was not murdered by HRC, Comet Pizza is not the center of a global child sex trafficking ring, Obama is not a secret Kenyan Muslim...


Hey, how come you forgot the biggest and most obvious conspiracy theory of all?

Repeat after me: Americans, not Russians, elected Trump in 2016.


It's so cute how you twist your sentence to create a straw man. Nobody thinks the Russians hacked cast ballots. The theory, whicc has been proven and admitted to, is that they used bots and sock puppets to spread targeted disinformation (like you just did) to amplify Trump and encourage people not to vote.


So?

How does that compare with the $2 billion Hillary had in the bank? With the billions of biased media "reporting" for years?

Whatever the Russians did, it's a nonissue (and if it was an issue, let's investigate the President who enabled it).

The conspiracy theory is that the Russians stole the election --- way crazier and more pernicious that those stupid Kenyan stories.


Thank you for finally owning up to it. I'm proud of you. To be honest, I was getting a little worried that you were actually believing your own spin.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If Twitter is actually trying to silence conservatives they do a pretty sh*tty job of it


It’s a liberal conspiracy! Conservative twits should be able to Twitter anti-Gay opinions, Kenyan birther memes, and all that good stuff like librals can!
Anonymous
OK, assume for the moment that Nunes’s “Twitter has an anti-conservative bias” argument is true.

You know who is in a really great position to conduct an investigation into the motivations and practices of an American company? Or to promote legislation to regulate it? Or propose ways it could increase its transparency for its users? A United States Congressman representing the state where that company is located!

So why doesn’t he do any of that, instead of filing this literally laugh out loud freak show of a lawsuit?
Anonymous
9:24 This isn't a real question. Anyone who was on Twitter for the past 8 years in the political arena understands who you could criticize on line, who controlled the Twitter gangs and how it worked.

Bless your heart.
Anonymous
Anonymous
What a whiner.

I love that the cow account is trolling the heck out of him.
Anonymous
Interestingly, Devin Nunes co-sponsored H.R.1179 - the Discouraging Frivolous Lawsuits Act last year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's so cute how you twist your sentence to create a straw man. Nobody thinks the Russians hacked cast ballots. The theory, whicc has been proven and admitted to, is that they used bots and sock puppets to spread targeted disinformation (like you just did) to amplify Trump and encourage people not to vote.


So?

How does that compare with the $2 billion Hillary had in the bank? With the billions of biased media "reporting" for years?

Whatever the Russians did, it's a nonissue (and if it was an issue, let's investigate the President who enabled it).

The conspiracy theory is that the Russians stole the election --- way crazier and more pernicious that those stupid Kenyan stories.


DP here, but you realize literally every single Trump speech was carried live, for free, by the cable news channels. All of them. That was hundreds of millions in free exposure that none of the other candidates, including Hillary, received.

Ask Senator McConnell, who was fully briefed in the summer of 2016, why he wouldn't make a bi-partisan statement about the known Russian involvement in the 2016 campaign. Without such a joint action, President Obama's hands were somewhat tied. Though the FBI did start an investigation, but people like you are claiming it is a witch hunt.

You can't have it both ways.

So let me as you this, after the "pussy tape" came out, within hours, was a release of hacked emails. Do you think that had anything to do with covering the pussy tape and deflecting attention back to Hillary malfeasance? Do you think the "weiner laptop" had anything to do with deflecting away from Trump?

Simply answer on these, yes or no.

The polling indicates that both of these actions materially impacted the results of the election, where Trump carried three key states by 80,000 votes.

Guess what, both of these actions were done in conjunction with the Trump campaign.
Anonymous
Devin Nunes' mom complained to Twitter about DevinNunes'Mom!!!! He actually complained to his mom.

Please God, may this story never go away
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Interestingly, Devin Nunes co-sponsored H.R.1179 - the Discouraging Frivolous Lawsuits Act last year.


post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: