Study shows conservatives are better looking

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Literally every conservative guy I know has a beer gut LOL. As for the women, they are Kate Gosslin type. So not unattractive, but not attractive either, if that makes sense. They are not necessarily skinnier than my liberal friends. In fact, my liberal friends are more diverse, and as a result, have better skin, muscle tone etc.

+1. Nailed it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Literally every conservative guy I know has a beer gut LOL. As for the women, they are Kate Gosslin type. So not unattractive, but not attractive either, if that makes sense. They are not necessarily skinnier than my liberal friends. In fact, my liberal friends are more diverse, and as a result, have better skin, muscle tone etc.

You have to control for socioeconomic status.

Really, all this study demonstrates is that wealth/upper-middle-class people tend to be more attractive than poor/working class people, which we already know.

[Anonymous]

FFS this thread is what’s wrong with discourse these days. People commenting did not even read the study, including, perhaps, the OP.

It has nothing to do with going to the gym, and they also controlled for SES. The authors specifically outline that



1. attractive people are given more in life/go through life more easily, from the early years

2. as a result they essentially think they have been successful due to them working harder than the ugly person next to them

3. they then think everyone should be able to pull themselves up by the bootstraps (sound familiar?) the way “they did”

4. therefore they don’t see the value of government aid and entitlements/“handouts” etc

5. as a result they tend to identify as conservative (ideology) and Republican (partisanship)



It’s not a testament to conservatism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, no, y'all. OP is onto something. I mean, look at this. No argument.

Mmmm, yes. Like the liberals are an attractive bunch themselves.

[Anonymous]

It’s not always money, look at the beautiful Ivanaka compared to these pigs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Literally every conservative guy I know has a beer gut LOL. As for the women, they are Kate Gosslin type. So not unattractive, but not attractive either, if that makes sense. They are not necessarily skinnier than my liberal friends. In fact, my liberal friends are more diverse, and as a result, have better skin, muscle tone etc.

What the eff does being more diverse have to do with better skin and muscle tone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally every conservative guy I know has a beer gut LOL. As for the women, they are Kate Gosslin type. So not unattractive, but not attractive either, if that makes sense. They are not necessarily skinnier than my liberal friends. In fact, my liberal friends are more diverse, and as a result, have better skin, muscle tone etc.

What the eff does being more diverse have to do with better skin and muscle tone?

Olive and dark skin is much more appealing than pale, pasty skin. Variety is the spice of life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is probably true. I've worked on the Hill. All of the conservative members have red hot, smoking interns and staff. Incredible blondes who work for batsh*t, freedom caucus idiots from Lubbock, Texas or wherever. They're usually sweet as pie, but still would personally deliver rat out their cleaning lady to ICE if they had the chance, or think Gay conversion therapy actually works.

The liberals? They're not really crushing it in the outward appearance area.Anyway, it probably boils down to the intelligent, but more homely democrat women (who actually care about others and understand social issues), who went to better schools and will end up being more successful later, whereas their sexy counterparts across the aisle will later quit and marry Bobby Fledgerson who owns a chain of Jiffy Lubes back in Marietta, Georgia.

Now picture this on a national level.

Hillary showed them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only proof you need is to look at the photos from the women's march last year, ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC.

Oh look another misogynistic post by a conservative proving why Republicans will never win the women’s vote.

Oh look, another liberal who only picks apart the Republicans' posts and excuses all the obscene postings from liberals.

+1,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If conservatives are better looking, why is most of Hollywood (typically above average in looks) liberal?

Because they’re busy touching each other.


Anyways, they’re not that hot. I’ve seen some hot women at JMU and UVA that match Hollywood looks for sure.

I've seen a thousand women on the streets of DC who look better than Ivanka. And most of them probably haven't even had plastic surgery. I wonder how many of them are conservatives?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Liberals are always so needy and whiny.

FTFY

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only proof you need is to look at the photos from the women's march last year, ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC.

Oh look another misogynistic post by a conservative proving why Republicans will never win the women’s vote.

Oh look, another liberal who only picks apart the Republicans' posts and excuses all the obscene postings from liberals.

Can't really address the issue of conservative misogyny, eh? Here's something to grapple with: women of all political spectrums dislike Trump more than men do. That's true of white Republican women who dislike him more than white Repubican men, and black Republican women who dislike him more than black Republican men. Your party has a gender problem and you are not going to address it by continually mocking and judging women by their appearances. Not in this political climate. We hear you and your disdain for women and we're out to get you at the polls. Because guess what: women vote at higher rates than men. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/genderdiff.pdf

DP here. It's interesting you think this. I'm a woman. I used to (generally) vote for the Democratic candidate. Never, ever again. Liberals have made the Democratic party unrecognizable. And if you think conservatives have "disdain for women," clearly you haven't been reading the many liberal posts right here on DCUM which display an incredible disdain for women - if they're not liberal, of course.

So bring it on at the polls. Maybe you'll win. But maybe not. I know who I *won't* be voting for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If conservatives are better looking, why is most of Hollywood (typically above average in looks) liberal?

Well, let's see. Because they have all the money in the world for personal trainers, chefs, stylists, and makeup artists? Just a thought.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HAHAHAHAHAHAHA+++++

I wish sometimes that we can ask Jeff to lock threads for stupidity....

I know, right?! Like these:
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/699424.page
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/698509.page
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/699113.page

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s not always money, look at the beautiful Ivanaka compared to these pigs.


Umm...if I had to choose, I would DEFINITELY choose for my daughter to grow up to be more like Amy Schumer than Ivanka. In fact, I would really be horrified if my daughter grew up to be a stepfordish-woman like Ivanka with her strange way of talking as if she wants to let everyone know she is not scary at all, and her curated image of perfection. So artificial and controlled.

But really, the role models I hold for my daughter are more along the lines of Marie Curie, Rosa Parks, Dorothy Day, Toni Morrison, and Tammy Duckworth. Women who have really contributed something of value to the world.