Study shows conservatives are better looking

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump puts that theory to considerable strain.

He was rather dashing as a young man.

That's back when he was a democrat though. Republicanism makes you ugly inside and out. People in Hollywood tend to be attractive and they are generally not Repubtards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally every conservative guy I know has a beer gut LOL. As for the women, they are Kate Gosslin type. So not unattractive, but not attractive either, if that makes sense. They are not necessarily skinnier than my liberal friends. In fact, my liberal friends are more diverse, and as a result, have better skin, muscle tone etc.

What the eff does being more diverse have to do with better skin and muscle tone?

Olive and dark skin is much more appealing than pale, pasty skin. Variety is the spice of life.

Maybe you're not aware, but olive, dark, AND white skin constitutes variety. Moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only proof you need is to look at the photos from the women's march last year, ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC.

Oh look another misogynistic post by a conservative proving why Republicans will never win the women’s vote.

Oh look, another liberal who only picks apart the Republicans' posts and excuses all the obscene postings from liberals.

Can't really address the issue of conservative misogyny, eh? Here's something to grapple with: women of all political spectrums dislike Trump more than men do. That's true of white Republican women who dislike him more than white Repubican men, and black Republican women who dislike him more than black Republican men. Your party has a gender problem and you are not going to address it by continually mocking and judging women by their appearances. Not in this political climate. We hear you and your disdain for women and we're out to get you at the polls. Because guess what: women vote at higher rates than men. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/genderdiff.pdf

DP here. It's interesting you think this. I'm a woman. I used to (generally) vote for the Democratic candidate. Never, ever again. Liberals have made the Democratic party unrecognizable. And if you think conservatives have "disdain for women," clearly you haven't been reading the many liberal posts right here on DCUM which display an incredible disdain for women - if they're not liberal, of course.

So bring it on at the polls. Maybe you'll win. But maybe not. I know who I *won't* be voting for.

We'll win the women's vote, that's for sure, even without you. It's not a matter of what I think, it's reality. You underestimate the depth of anger that so many women feel in this country, anger that an unrepentant pussy-grabber is in the Oval Office.

This entire thread is full of conservatives saying how fat and ugly liberal women are. Such posts appear ALL THE TIME on this site. Because apparently conservatives think women are only to be judged by their looks and seem to think that judging them harshly for their looks is the worst insult you can give women. Meanwhile there is true disdain for women happening in Congress right now as McConnell is going to introduce a bill to ban abortions after 20 weeks, taking a medical decision away from women.

Oh, spare us all. You're simply selectively outraged about conservatives, so you refuse to acknowledge the many threads full of LIBERALS writing ugly, demeaning, misogynistic things about conservative women. It happens every single day here. Liberals claim to be the party of women, yet the reality is that they only champion other liberal women - never conservative.

So forgive us if we're not terribly sympathetic to the criticisms of liberal women. Liberals here on DCUM certainly have done nothing to engender our support.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If conservatives are better looking, why is most of Hollywood (typically above average in looks) liberal?

Because they’re busy touching each other.


Anyways, they’re not that hot. I’ve seen some hot women at JMU and UVA that match Hollywood looks for sure.

I've seen a thousand women on the streets of DC who look better than Ivanka. And most of them probably haven't even had plastic surgery. I wonder how many of them are conservatives?

Now this just made me laugh. Reaching, much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only proof you need is to look at the photos from the women's march last year, ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC.

Oh look another misogynistic post by a conservative proving why Republicans will never win the women’s vote.

Oh look, another liberal who only picks apart the Republicans' posts and excuses all the obscene postings from liberals.

Can't really address the issue of conservative misogyny, eh? Here's something to grapple with: women of all political spectrums dislike Trump more than men do. That's true of white Republican women who dislike him more than white Repubican men, and black Republican women who dislike him more than black Republican men. Your party has a gender problem and you are not going to address it by continually mocking and judging women by their appearances. Not in this political climate. We hear you and your disdain for women and we're out to get you at the polls. Because guess what: women vote at higher rates than men. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/genderdiff.pdf

DP here. It's interesting you think this. I'm a woman. I used to (generally) vote for the Democratic candidate. Never, ever again. Liberals have made the Democratic party unrecognizable. And if you think conservatives have "disdain for women," clearly you haven't been reading the many liberal posts right here on DCUM which display an incredible disdain for women - if they're not liberal, of course.

So bring it on at the polls. Maybe you'll win. But maybe not. I know who I *won't* be voting for.

We'll win the women's vote, that's for sure, even without you. It's not a matter of what I think, it's reality. You underestimate the depth of anger that so many women feel in this country, anger that an unrepentant pussy-grabber is in the Oval Office.

This entire thread is full of conservatives saying how fat and ugly liberal women are. Such posts appear ALL THE TIME on this site. Because apparently conservatives think women are only to be judged by their looks and seem to think that judging them harshly for their looks is the worst insult you can give women. Meanwhile there is true disdain for women happening in Congress right now as McConnell is going to introduce a bill to ban abortions after 20 weeks, taking a medical decision away from women.

Did you say something about "underestimating"? I seem to remember a gross underestimation of the way millions of people were going to vote in 2016. So you continue with your overconfidence. It will be interesting to see if you've learned anything at all from the way the last election went, and about discounting the voices of millions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For once, I’m gonna have to agree with the conservatives on this one. Ann Coulter’s beauty and class are off the charts.

And the dried up Conway

Thank you for proving the point that liberals will take any opportunity to criticize a woman's looks - if she's a conservative. Perfect illustration. You're just common misogynists, pretending to be otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

We'll win the women's vote, that's for sure, even without you. It's not a matter of what I think, it's reality. You underestimate the depth of anger that so many women feel in this country, anger that an unrepentant pussy-grabber is in the Oval Office.

We know y'all secretly long for the orange one, late at night. His golden tresses flying in the breeze like Fabio, only shorter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only proof you need is to look at the photos from the women's march last year, ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC.

Oh look another misogynistic post by a conservative proving why Republicans will never win the women’s vote.

Oh look, another liberal who only picks apart the Republicans' posts and excuses all the obscene postings from liberals.

Can't really address the issue of conservative misogyny, eh? Here's something to grapple with: women of all political spectrums dislike Trump more than men do. That's true of white Republican women who dislike him more than white Repubican men, and black Republican women who dislike him more than black Republican men. Your party has a gender problem and you are not going to address it by continually mocking and judging women by their appearances. Not in this political climate. We hear you and your disdain for women and we're out to get you at the polls. Because guess what: women vote at higher rates than men. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/genderdiff.pdf

DP here. It's interesting you think this. I'm a woman. I used to (generally) vote for the Democratic candidate. Never, ever again. Liberals have made the Democratic party unrecognizable. And if you think conservatives have "disdain for women," clearly you haven't been reading the many liberal posts right here on DCUM which display an incredible disdain for women - if they're not liberal, of course.

So bring it on at the polls. Maybe you'll win. But maybe not. I know who I *won't* be voting for.

We'll win the women's vote, that's for sure, even without you. It's not a matter of what I think, it's reality. You underestimate the depth of anger that so many women feel in this country, anger that an unrepentant pussy-grabber is in the Oval Office.

This entire thread is full of conservatives saying how fat and ugly liberal women are. Such posts appear ALL THE TIME on this site. Because apparently conservatives think women are only to be judged by their looks and seem to think that judging them harshly for their looks is the worst insult you can give women. Meanwhile there is true disdain for women happening in Congress right now as McConnell is going to introduce a bill to ban abortions after 20 weeks, taking a medical decision away from women.

Hate to break it to you, but women are primarily judged on their looks rather than their achievements.

You're not "breaking it to me" - I said just that very thing. And it's especially conservatives who seem invested in keeping it that way.

Right?! The liberals at 22:53 aren't at ALL misogynistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump puts that theory to considerable strain.

He was rather dashing as a young man.

That's back when he was a democrat though. Republicanism makes you ugly inside and out. People in Hollywood tend to be attractive and they are generally not Repubtards.

I think we've already established that the libtards in Hollywood are attractive because they have the resources for stylists, chefs, and oh yes - plastic surgeons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump puts that theory to considerable strain.

He was rather dashing as a young man.

That's back when he was a democrat though. Republicanism makes you ugly inside and out. People in Hollywood tend to be attractive and they are generally not Repubtards.

I think we've already established that the libtards in Hollywood are attractive because they have the resources for stylists, chefs, and oh yes - plastic surgeons.

Yes and they live in gated homes where they don't worry about things regular people have concerns about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally every conservative guy I know has a beer gut LOL. As for the women, they are Kate Gosslin type. So not unattractive, but not attractive either, if that makes sense. They are not necessarily skinnier than my liberal friends. In fact, my liberal friends are more diverse, and as a result, have better skin, muscle tone etc.

What the eff does being more diverse have to do with better skin and muscle tone?

Olive and dark skin is much more appealing than pale, pasty skin. Variety is the spice of life.

Maybe you're not aware, but olive, dark, AND white skin constitutes variety. Moron.

Plus the previous poster assumption that all Republicans are white. That’s called stereotyping

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump puts that theory to considerable strain.

He was rather dashing as a young man.

That's back when he was a democrat though. Republicanism makes you ugly inside and out. People in Hollywood tend to be attractive and they are generally not Repubtards.

I think we've already established that the libtards in Hollywood are attractive because they have the resources for stylists, chefs, and oh yes - plastic surgeons.

Yes and they live in gated homes where they don't worry about things regular people have concerns about.

Studies actually show that liberals equal money and most conservative do. Liberals baster whole put it hopefully on virtue signaling and hypocrisy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump puts that theory to considerable strain.

He was rather dashing as a young man.

That's back when he was a democrat though. Republicanism makes you ugly inside and out. People in Hollywood tend to be attractive and they are generally not Repubtards.

I think we've already established that the libtards in Hollywood are attractive because they have the resources for stylists, chefs, and oh yes - plastic surgeons.

Yes and they live in gated homes where they don't worry about things regular people have concerns about.

Studies actually show that liberals equal money and most conservative do. Liberals baster whole put it hopefully on virtue signaling and hypocrisy

Wow. Incoherent word salad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump puts that theory to considerable strain.

He was rather dashing as a young man.

That's back when he was a democrat though. Republicanism makes you ugly inside and out. People in Hollywood tend to be attractive and they are generally not Repubtards.

I think we've already established that the libtards in Hollywood are attractive because they have the resources for stylists, chefs, and oh yes - plastic surgeons.

Yes and they live in gated homes where they don't worry about things regular people have concerns about.

Studies actually show that liberals equal money and most conservative do. Liberals baster whole put it hopefully on virtue signaling and hypocrisy

’Twas brillig and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe. All mimsy were the borogoves, and the mome raths outgrabe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally every conservative guy I know has a beer gut LOL. As for the women, they are Kate Gosslin type. So not unattractive, but not attractive either, if that makes sense. They are not necessarily skinnier than my liberal friends. In fact, my liberal friends are more diverse, and as a result, have better skin, muscle tone etc.

What the eff does being more diverse have to do with better skin and muscle tone?

Olive and dark skin is much more appealing than pale, pasty skin. Variety is the spice of life.

Maybe you're not aware, but olive, dark, AND white skin constitutes variety. Moron.

Plus the previous poster assumption that all Republicans are white. That’s called stereotyping

Not by much: