Time to vote Republican, isn't it? |
Agreed. |
Liberal with four kids here. Shut your pie hole. |
Seriously, Two of my best friends came from large families 7 and 9. They are the closest most loving families I know. I have always been envious of their close and emotionally healthy relationships--and now the beauty of their extended families. |
New poster. Only read the first page. 4 kids under 5 is not fair towards the kids. Parents can choose, while kids can't. They are all small, they want to be babies for a while, not to have to share their parents with 3 more babies. |
You know what? All kinds of families can be happy. Families with kids spaced very close together can be happy. Families with twins and multiples can be happy. Families with one child can be happy. Families with more than one child, widely spaced, can be happy. Families with no children can be happy. One person can be happy by herself with no family.
I have one child and he is very happy. My father was one of 14 children, closely spaced, and he had a very happy childhood. He had extraordinarily close and loving relationships with his siblings that I envied greatly, having grown up with two brothers who weren't close with me at all. People need to stop making absolute pronouncements about what will make babies happy. Babies are adaptable. Lots of situations can be happy and healthy for them. Similarly, there are singletons or widely spaced kids who have miserable childhoods whose parents are neglectful, self-absorbed, punitive, or whatever. I have only one child. It's no one's business to comment or criticize that any more than someone with 4 kids. |
Do you talk about climate change? A lot? ![]() |
Not my experience with related families of five and seven. |
I'm from a huge family of kids and of course we all love each other and we have a ton of fun together. I've also NEVER heard of a family with a bunch of kids that didn't have some serious black sheep. It's selfish to have that many kids, period. It's fun having a shiny new baby and cute kids to show off. It is IMPOSSIBLE to raise that many children the way the same parent would raise, say two children. If you think otherwise, you are deluding yourself. I also can only think of one family with 4 kids that I know that was in the position financially to have them, so chances are your friends are thinking "WTF" |
I would be supportive of you OP. If you have the ability to provide for your kids and you are happy then I am VERY happy for you. I think it's great having kids close in age and as many as you can take care of. |
Maybe it's because they've had kids and they know how much work it is. It's easy when they are babies, but it's more work and money when they are in middle school on. And then think about college? Goodness, I can't imagine paying for 4 kids in college at the same time... |
Do your religious beliefs have anything to do with the number of kids you are having, and the speed with which you are having them? Are those beliefs different from your family's beliefs? That could be part of their "concern" as well. |
OP, I am happy for you! Good luck with the rest of your pregnancy. DCUM has many women that put off child-bearing until they could not have more than 1 or 2 (often having to use another woman's eggs). It is also a group that expects that parents completely pay for college, provide expensive vacations, etc. for kids. So they're unlikely to be supportive. |
If I knew you I would wish you well in public and voice some concern in private, because of my own experiences with how hard it was to have just a couple of babies and toddlers at once. But of course it's your life. I would just fear for your health and sanity because I know mine suffered with fewer kids! |
Must be like throwing a hotdog down a hallway at this point....
|