I am so angry at the people who don't vaccinate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Why are you being so specific about newborns? I don't have a newborn and your comment is irrelevant as well as ignorant. Your poor unvaccinated children can sicken or kill the rest of ours at pretty much any age. Go move to a deserted island. Or better yet, vaccinate your vulnerable children and start living up to your most basic parental duty: to protect them. Not to mention your civic duty to contribute to herd immunity. I have plenty of common sense and am happy to share it. Oh, and speaking of time-honored ways of protecting babies, there's another: it's called vaccination. Look it up.

Uh, because the post was about a six week old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Well, in this case, newborns were exposed at the hospital in L&D. I don't think the parents are the ones without common sense.

Really? The child was dragged to a birth in a hospital as well as Home Depot and the grocery store? Weird.

You really are dense. Yes. L&D was exposed. The hospital has listed certain rooms. Peds was also exposed. As was apheresis, psychiatry and diagnostic radiation. CVS, too. I guess everyone should have just stayed home. Instead of some a$$hole parent getting a simple and cheap vaccine for his child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Well, in this case, newborns were exposed at the hospital in L&D. I don't think the parents are the ones without common sense.

Really? The child was dragged to a birth in a hospital as well as Home Depot and the grocery store? Weird.

You really are dense. Yes. L&D was exposed. The hospital has listed certain rooms. Peds was also exposed. As was apheresis, psychiatry and diagnostic radiation. CVS, too. I guess everyone should have just stayed home. Instead of some a$$hole parent getting a simple and cheap vaccine for his child.

Or instead of dragging a sick child all over creation. Why aren't sick children kept home these days? (And SERIOUSLY, they let a sick child in L&D, and you think that is fine? I don't.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

See, I knew there was something off about you. We love cereal, as do all people who embrace science with common sense.

Maybe give me some suggestions, then? Preferably something that will make me immune to polio, tetanus, measles and herpes. Thanks!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Why are you being so specific about newborns? I don't have a newborn and your comment is irrelevant as well as ignorant. Your poor unvaccinated children can sicken or kill the rest of ours at pretty much any age. Go move to a deserted island. Or better yet, vaccinate your vulnerable children and start living up to your most basic parental duty: to protect them. Not to mention your civic duty to contribute to herd immunity. I have plenty of common sense and am happy to share it. Oh, and speaking of time-honored ways of protecting babies, there's another: it's called vaccination. Look it up.

Uh, because the post was about a six week old.

Uh, but the post you hit "quote" on was not. Uh, the OP's was, but, uh, that is not the post you directly quoted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Well, in this case, newborns were exposed at the hospital in L&D. I don't think the parents are the ones without common sense.

Really? The child was dragged to a birth in a hospital as well as Home Depot and the grocery store? Weird.

You really are dense. Yes. L&D was exposed. The hospital has listed certain rooms. Peds was also exposed. As was apheresis, psychiatry and diagnostic radiation. CVS, too. I guess everyone should have just stayed home. Instead of some a$$hole parent getting a simple and cheap vaccine for his child.

Or instead of dragging a sick child all over creation. Why aren't sick children kept home these days? (And SERIOUSLY, they let a sick child in L&D, and you think that is fine? I don't.)

Omg. Let me speak slowly and clearly. The child went to the hospital to be treated. Since it is a communicable disease, people were exposed. I sincerely doubt the child was in L&D.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Why are you being so specific about newborns? I don't have a newborn and your comment is irrelevant as well as ignorant. Your poor unvaccinated children can sicken or kill the rest of ours at pretty much any age. Go move to a deserted island. Or better yet, vaccinate your vulnerable children and start living up to your most basic parental duty: to protect them. Not to mention your civic duty to contribute to herd immunity. I have plenty of common sense and am happy to share it. Oh, and speaking of time-honored ways of protecting babies, there's another: it's called vaccination. Look it up.

Uh, because the post was about a six week old.

Uh, but the post you hit "quote" on was not. Uh, the OP's was, but, uh, that is not the post you directly quoted.

But, uh, the post I responded to was in response to a six week old child. Post: My youngest is just 6 weeks old. Post I responded to: "(squeal) OMG, I could have written this post! I even say the same thing about the island all the time!! OMG!!"

See?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Why are you being so specific about newborns? I don't have a newborn and your comment is irrelevant as well as ignorant. Your poor unvaccinated children can sicken or kill the rest of ours at pretty much any age. Go move to a deserted island. Or better yet, vaccinate your vulnerable children and start living up to your most basic parental duty: to protect them. Not to mention your civic duty to contribute to herd immunity. I have plenty of common sense and am happy to share it. Oh, and speaking of time-honored ways of protecting babies, there's another: it's called vaccination. Look it up.

Uh, because the post was about a six week old.

Uh, but the post you hit "quote" on was not. Uh, the OP's was, but, uh, that is not the post you directly quoted.

But, uh, the post I responded to was in response to a six week old child. Post: My youngest is just 6 weeks old. Post I responded to: "(squeal) OMG, I could have written this post! I even say the same thing about the island all the time!! OMG!!"

See?

"Squeal"? "OMG"? You have problems, PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Well, in this case, newborns were exposed at the hospital in L&D. I don't think the parents are the ones without common sense.

Really? The child was dragged to a birth in a hospital as well as Home Depot and the grocery store? Weird.

You really are dense. Yes. L&D was exposed. The hospital has listed certain rooms. Peds was also exposed. As was apheresis, psychiatry and diagnostic radiation. CVS, too. I guess everyone should have just stayed home. Instead of some a$$hole parent getting a simple and cheap vaccine for his child.

Or instead of dragging a sick child all over creation. Why aren't sick children kept home these days? (And SERIOUSLY, they let a sick child in L&D, and you think that is fine? I don't.)

Omg. Let me speak slowly and clearly. The child went to the hospital to be treated. Since it is a communicable disease, people were exposed. I sincerely doubt the child was in L&D.

Ha ha! For all your faith in medical science, you don't have much faith in hospitals!! Are you saying everyone in the hospital was exposed or do you not know there are protocols in place to keep that from happening in a hospital? (And if you are aware there are protocols in place to keep diseases from spreading in a hospital, do you admit that L&D was just thrown in for drama, aka, the "you don't care about kittens and babies" side of your 'scientific argument'?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Why are you being so specific about newborns? I don't have a newborn and your comment is irrelevant as well as ignorant. Your poor unvaccinated children can sicken or kill the rest of ours at pretty much any age. Go move to a deserted island. Or better yet, vaccinate your vulnerable children and start living up to your most basic parental duty: to protect them. Not to mention your civic duty to contribute to herd immunity. I have plenty of common sense and am happy to share it. Oh, and speaking of time-honored ways of protecting babies, there's another: it's called vaccination. Look it up.

Uh, because the post was about a six week old.

Uh, but the post you hit "quote" on was not. Uh, the OP's was, but, uh, that is not the post you directly quoted.

But, uh, the post I responded to was in response to a six week old child. Post: My youngest is just 6 weeks old. Post I responded to: "(squeal) OMG, I could have written this post! I even say the same thing about the island all the time!! OMG!!"

See?

"Squeal"? "OMG"? You have problems, PP.

Uh, "OMG" was actually in the post....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Well, in this case, newborns were exposed at the hospital in L&D. I don't think the parents are the ones without common sense.

Really? The child was dragged to a birth in a hospital as well as Home Depot and the grocery store? Weird.

You really are dense. Yes. L&D was exposed. The hospital has listed certain rooms. Peds was also exposed. As was apheresis, psychiatry and diagnostic radiation. CVS, too. I guess everyone should have just stayed home. Instead of some a$$hole parent getting a simple and cheap vaccine for his child.

Or instead of dragging a sick child all over creation. Why aren't sick children kept home these days? (And SERIOUSLY, they let a sick child in L&D, and you think that is fine? I don't.)

Omg. Let me speak slowly and clearly. The child went to the hospital to be treated. Since it is a communicable disease, people were exposed. I sincerely doubt the child was in L&D.

Ha ha! For all your faith in medical science, you don't have much faith in hospitals!! Are you saying everyone in the hospital was exposed or do you not know there are protocols in place to keep that from happening in a hospital? (And if you are aware there are protocols in place to keep diseases from spreading in a hospital, do you admit that L&D was just thrown in for drama, aka, the "you don't care about kittens and babies" side of your 'scientific argument'?)

You are a moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Why are you being so specific about newborns? I don't have a newborn and your comment is irrelevant as well as ignorant. Your poor unvaccinated children can sicken or kill the rest of ours at pretty much any age. Go move to a deserted island. Or better yet, vaccinate your vulnerable children and start living up to your most basic parental duty: to protect them. Not to mention your civic duty to contribute to herd immunity. I have plenty of common sense and am happy to share it. Oh, and speaking of time-honored ways of protecting babies, there's another: it's called vaccination. Look it up.

Uh, because the post was about a six week old.

Uh, but the post you hit "quote" on was not. Uh, the OP's was, but, uh, that is not the post you directly quoted.

But, uh, the post I responded to was in response to a six week old child. Post: My youngest is just 6 weeks old. Post I responded to: "(squeal) OMG, I could have written this post! I even say the same thing about the island all the time!! OMG!!"

See?

"Squeal"? "OMG"? You have problems, PP.

Uh, "OMG" was actually in the post....

Where? I don't see it. Or "squeal," either...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Why are you being so specific about newborns? I don't have a newborn and your comment is irrelevant as well as ignorant. Your poor unvaccinated children can sicken or kill the rest of ours at pretty much any age. Go move to a deserted island. Or better yet, vaccinate your vulnerable children and start living up to your most basic parental duty: to protect them. Not to mention your civic duty to contribute to herd immunity. I have plenty of common sense and am happy to share it. Oh, and speaking of time-honored ways of protecting babies, there's another: it's called vaccination. Look it up.

Uh, because the post was about a six week old.

Uh, but the post you hit "quote" on was not. Uh, the OP's was, but, uh, that is not the post you directly quoted.

But, uh, the post I responded to was in response to a six week old child. Post: My youngest is just 6 weeks old. Post I responded to: "(squeal) OMG, I could have written this post! I even say the same thing about the island all the time!! OMG!!"

See?

"Squeal"? "OMG"? You have problems, PP.

Uh, "OMG" was actually in the post....

Where? I don't see it. Or "squeal," either...

Sorry, my mistake. It was +1 not OMG. Just sounded very "squeal OMG" in tone. ("OMG Larla I ALWAYS say I want people to get shipped off to an island!!")

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Well, in this case, newborns were exposed at the hospital in L&D. I don't think the parents are the ones without common sense.

Really? The child was dragged to a birth in a hospital as well as Home Depot and the grocery store? Weird.

You really are dense. Yes. L&D was exposed. The hospital has listed certain rooms. Peds was also exposed. As was apheresis, psychiatry and diagnostic radiation. CVS, too. I guess everyone should have just stayed home. Instead of some a$$hole parent getting a simple and cheap vaccine for his child.

Or instead of dragging a sick child all over creation. Why aren't sick children kept home these days? (And SERIOUSLY, they let a sick child in L&D, and you think that is fine? I don't.)

Omg. Let me speak slowly and clearly. The child went to the hospital to be treated. Since it is a communicable disease, people were exposed. I sincerely doubt the child was in L&D.

Ha ha! For all your faith in medical science, you don't have much faith in hospitals!! Are you saying everyone in the hospital was exposed or do you not know there are protocols in place to keep that from happening in a hospital? (And if you are aware there are protocols in place to keep diseases from spreading in a hospital, do you admit that L&D was just thrown in for drama, aka, the "you don't care about kittens and babies" side of your 'scientific argument'?)

You are a moron.

Hurts to be wrong doesn't it. That doesn't mean you have to call people names though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My youngest is just 6 weeks old so has not had her shots yet. And after hearing the stories of measles exposure in Fairfax and Loudon, I am so worried. She wasn't in any of the places listed, of course, but I have 2 older children that go to school, play sports, go to birthday parties, etc.
I think the non- vaxers should all have to go live on an island somewhere.

+1. I could have written this post. I even say the thing about the island all the time! It makes me sick that all these ignorant, selfish people are endangering our (and their own) children with their irresponsible, paranoid, anti-science b.s.

Your newborns are the ones who should be kept away from the general public. If you have any common sense and are concerned about illnesses, then you should be keeping your newborns home. This is a time-honored way of handling babies.

Well, in this case, newborns were exposed at the hospital in L&D. I don't think the parents are the ones without common sense.

Really? The child was dragged to a birth in a hospital as well as Home Depot and the grocery store? Weird.

You really are dense. Yes. L&D was exposed. The hospital has listed certain rooms. Peds was also exposed. As was apheresis, psychiatry and diagnostic radiation. CVS, too. I guess everyone should have just stayed home. Instead of some a$$hole parent getting a simple and cheap vaccine for his child.

Or instead of dragging a sick child all over creation. Why aren't sick children kept home these days? (And SERIOUSLY, they let a sick child in L&D, and you think that is fine? I don't.)

Omg. Let me speak slowly and clearly. The child went to the hospital to be treated. Since it is a communicable disease, people were exposed. I sincerely doubt the child was in L&D.

Ha ha! For all your faith in medical science, you don't have much faith in hospitals!! Are you saying everyone in the hospital was exposed or do you not know there are protocols in place to keep that from happening in a hospital? (And if you are aware there are protocols in place to keep diseases from spreading in a hospital, do you admit that L&D was just thrown in for drama, aka, the "you don't care about kittens and babies" side of your 'scientific argument'?)

You are a moron.

Hurts to be wrong doesn't it. That doesn't mean you have to call people names though.

http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/virginia/2014/05/06/measles-northern-virginia/8775081/