Stokes- the last hurrah

[Anonymous]

OK, so the list might move 7 or 10 spots. Out of how many hundred lottery applications? It just feels sad and delusional to even consider it as an option. Maybe that's my "been burned in too many lotteries to count on anything" mindset talking.

[Anonymous]

WL number low single digits. Chances?... Before people start screaming, I don't know my official number yet, but I'm assuming its low because of what happened on application day.

[Anonymous]

So the BS from people saying they got in With WL numbers in the 20s were in fact BSing/Trolling

[Anonymous]

I love how there have been about 30 people on this forum in the last few months who have said they are SURE they are in the top 10 based on when they submitted their application. Everybody can't be right. And that's assuming you trust the system to begin with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just got an email. All spots went to siblings.

That was expected, the waiting list is the important thing.

for what grade?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just got an email. All spots went to siblings.

That was expected, the waiting list is the important thing.

When will the wait list come out? Will it be posted and updated over time on the website?

Posted online by COB on April 12th. Don't know about the updating.

In the past they have not updated the online online results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just got an email. All spots went to siblings.

That was expected, the waiting list is the important thing.

for what grade?

prek3/prek4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone heard if any other grades will hold a lottery?

No 2nd grade lottery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how there have been about 30 people on this forum in the last few months who have said they are SURE they are in the top 10 based on when they submitted their application. Everybody can't be right. And that's assuming you trust the system to begin with.

At least 20 of the people are me. I'm not getting the answers I want, so I keep re-putting it back out there. Sorry!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So the BS from people saying they got in With WL numbers in the 20s were in fact BSing/Trolling

Not at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how there have been about 30 people on this forum in the last few months who have said they are SURE they are in the top 10 based on when they submitted their application. Everybody can't be right. And that's assuming you trust the system to begin with.

At least 20 of the people are me. I'm not getting the answers I want, so I keep re-putting it back out there. Sorry!

While we all wish you the best, it's impossible to know your chances on the waitlist when nobody knows what the numbers are going to look like because of the crash. You might think you have a low single digit number, but there is no way to know for sure until the list comes out. All the speculation in the world is not going to help you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the BS from people saying they got in With WL numbers in the 20s were in fact BSing/Trolling

Not at all.

Ok, expert. So what are my chances for Pre-k?

[Anonymous]

What about that consultant lady everyone kept slamming. Anyone know if she has any scoop on Stokes? It's be worth the $100 to know my chances.

[Anonymous]

PP, what answer are you looking for? You keep coming on here asking about your chances if you have a wl number in the single digits. All we can tell you is that your chances are decent. What more could we possibly say? You won't even share the time you were able to submit.

[Anonymous]

^^ because I'm not sure of the time, but it was really early.