Former Prince Andrew arrested

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love the King's response to this. So cold.

"Why Andrew couldn't have the decency to cheat on his wife and have her killed, I'll never know."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files have become bigger than life, people are turning the files into something they want it to be rather than what they are.

We do know Epstein was "recruiting" young women and putting them in positions of availability. But it doesn't mean many of the men's named in the files did anything illegal on their end. It is not illegal to sleep with a woman you met at a party. Most of these women were of legal age. That is why prosecution is so complicated in this area.

Andrew was arrested because he apparently shared government information. That can be prosecuted. Howard Lutnick lying about his association with Epstein is not prosecutable as he didn't lie under oath.

There are also many names in the Epstein files of people who clearly knew him but there is no evidence they actually did anything wrong and their greatest crime is having been friendly with him. That's Lutnick, so far. Or the Clintons. You don't arrest people simply for being known to having been at an Epstein party. Much of the reaction right now reeks more of a sanctimonious vigilante mob and Salem Witch trial mentality. Which is a shame as there were really unethical things Epstein and Maxwell did.

It wasn’t just sex trafficking. Epstein had information on people, traded secrets, looks like he got inside info re: stock trades, and all sorts of other sketchy, grifting, illegal activities. Money laundering happens in many ways and Epstein should be looked at for that as well. Andrew wasn’t the only one sharing government or other secrets.

Yeah, Epstein was using the girls or young women as an inducement to get people like Andrew to share secrets -- he would then trade that for access to more girls/young women or more secrets, like a big spiderweb. So cutting away at the information-sharing helps undercut the sex abuse. They aren't unrelated.

[Anonymous]

hee hee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love the King's response to this. So cold.

He wouldn't be the first heir to bring down the hammer on a sibling once their last parent had died.

I wonder if Charles is on some level enjoying watching the brother his mom loved the most crash & burn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love the King's response to this. So cold.

"Why Andrew couldn't have the decency to cheat on his wife and have her killed, I'll never know."

[Anonymous]

I bet it's killing Andrew to be interrogated as plain old Mr Mountbatten-Windsor (or whatver surname he has these days).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPILL IT ALL ANDREW!

+1. We need Andrew to confirm Trump's involvement.

"he's a criminal! I'd never be friends with him!" - DJT probably

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love the King's response to this. So cold.

I wish you had posted what he said. Here it is

Charles said there must be a “full, fair and proper” investigation into Mountbatten-Windsor, who has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in a public office in relation to his friendship with the late convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein.

“Let me state clearly: the law must take its course,” Charles said, adding that the investigation would have “our full and wholehearted support and co-operation.” Meanwhile, he added, “my family and I will continue in our duty and service to you all. Charles R.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPILL IT ALL ANDREW!

+1. We need Andrew to confirm Trump's involvement.

"he's a criminal! I'd never be friends with him!" - DJT probably

Never liked the guy. Don't really know him. But I was totally exonerated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPILL IT ALL ANDREW!

+1. We need Andrew to confirm Trump's involvement.

"he's a criminal! I'd never be friends with him!" - DJT probably

"Andrew? He brought me coffee once." LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

I don't believe this. But ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:About time. I wonder if he will name other names.

If he isn't conveniently suicided, I bet he will name some names.

+1 I read an article about his new home. Marsh Farm.

1. The house is a dump by Royal Family standards. They had a rodent company there.

2. It appears the home is visible from the road. Does not look too secure.

Perhaps giving him this house in view of the road (less secure) is similar to Charles refusing his son Harry any security at all. Either they stay away or take a big risk.

[Anonymous]

Pompous Andy may be doing some time. The "life in prison" thing is technically possible, but absurd. That said, there's plenty of people in the UK doing 18 months, 3 years, 5 years, etc., for Misconduct in Public Office convictions.

King Chaz is sick of him. The PM and Parliament don't care. He's widely unliked and has been for a while. Off to the cells!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

I think it is more of a thing he knew was coming, but just didn’t know the exact timing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

I think it is more of a thing he knew was coming, but just didn’t know the exact timing.

This is what I think too.