Former Prince Andrew arrested

[Anonymous]

BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

I doubt that but whatever. The royal family has been planning for this. Strip him of titles, kick him out, and let the police have at him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Quite pathetic that white collar crimes get investigated more vigorously than crimes against persons.

Makes sense in our society. Money is worshipped and people are disposible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

I doubt that but whatever. The royal family has been planning for this. Strip him of titles, kick him out, and let the police have at him.

I doubt it too, especially due to logistics.

[Anonymous]

SPILL IT ALL ANDREW!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quite pathetic that white collar crimes get investigated more vigorously than crimes against persons.

Makes sense in our society. Money is worshipped and people are disposible.

If only we could find people guilty on the basis of an email message. Stupid legal system.

[Anonymous]

Funny how all the Europeans with ties to Epstein are facing consequences while Americans with closer ties (Trump, commerce secretary Lutnick) continue on with no issues.

[Anonymous]

What is also happening with his ex wife?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

He had already announced his support of any inquiries and investigations that might occur.

The UK has an evidentiary problem with charging Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor with sex crimes, because his known conduct at this time was not illegal in Britain. They aren’t trying to hide anything, they’re charging what they can, and perhaps in the course of the case, they’ll find more chargeable offenses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

Agreed. I don't know if we'll ever see an Americans arrested. We suck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

They didn’t arrest him for sex crimes. He was trading national secrets to foreign governments for payouts. He was also giving insider information.

But, yes, we need to step up our investigation and arrest those involved with the sex trafficking.

Sort of like arresting Jimmy Hoffa for tax evasion. Although it would be great if he apologizes to the trafficking victims, implicates Trump, and/or spills on who in the BRF knew what and when.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

He had already announced his support of any inquiries and investigations that might occur.

The UK has an evidentiary problem with charging Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor with sex crimes, because his known conduct at this time was not illegal in Britain. They aren’t trying to hide anything, they’re charging what they can, and perhaps in the course of the case, they’ll find more chargeable offenses.

I believe trafficking is illegal in Britain, even if Virginia was older than their age 16 law for minors?

[Anonymous]

I have always thought that the entire Epstein operation was a Mossad honeytrap to gain leverage over powerful figures (regardless of political party). I hope the Brits keep pulling on the thread of him sharing trade secrets with Epstein and explore that angle thoroughly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

Here in 'Merica, we celebrate child rapists and elect them to the highest office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Quite pathetic that white collar crimes get investigated more vigorously than crimes against persons.

I don't think that the UK can prosecute for Andrew's sex crimes, because they didn't happen in the UK; whereas they do have jurisdiction over the sale of information belonging to the UK gov't.