Former Prince Andrew arrested

[Anonymous]

At least Harry has the good sense to keep his mouth shut. Don’t get in the way of your adversary destroying themselves.

[Anonymous]

Good. Now lets see some of these crooked politicians and business leaders arrested.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SPILL IT ALL ANDREW!

+1. We need Andrew to confirm Trump's involvement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At least Harry has the good sense to keep his mouth shut. Don’t get in the way of your adversary destroying themselves.

He could always open it for $$$.

[Anonymous]

It’s bizarre that some of you think Andrew would even touch the sex issues. He was arrested for a completely different reason and there is no way he would voluntarily admit to any of the sexual abuse allegations - he’s denied them all along. So he’s obviously going to refuse to discuss or disclose anything related to that - to include implicating anyone else. If he’s denied it all along, he has to stick to his script. And that’s not at all why he was arrested.

[Anonymous]

I love the King's response to this. So cold.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love the King's response to this. So cold.

I think he means it, too. I don't think any of them will be sad to get rid of Andrew, or frankly, Fergie. I always thought Fergie was desperate but harmless, but now I have a completely different view of her.

[Anonymous]

Sad state of affairs in the U.S.

Stop protecting them. Persecute them for their crimes.

The evidence is there. Everywhere!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Extremely telling, no arrests in USA or Israel yet.  

Reported to Jeff for antisemitism.

well I'm reporting you to Jeff for your stupidity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

So true. I hope this arrest leads to testimony that damns trump. Even if our government wimps out, our children and grandchildren will know the truth.
I admire the British do much for this brave and just move.

Do you even understand why he was arrested??

it doesn't matter why, they arrested him for something they know he'll go to prison for.

[Anonymous]

I think it will be a hoot if Fergie testifies against Randy Andy- she has some pretty sticky fingers herself. And she will do anything to save her own hide and make a few bucks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s bizarre that some of you think Andrew would even touch the sex issues. He was arrested for a completely different reason and there is no way he would voluntarily admit to any of the sexual abuse allegations - he’s denied them all along. So he’s obviously going to refuse to discuss or disclose anything related to that - to include implicating anyone else. If he’s denied it all along, he has to stick to his script. And that’s not at all why he was arrested.

He will stick to the script until they make it worth his while.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files have become bigger than life, people are turning the files into something they want it to be rather than what they are.

We do know Epstein was "recruiting" young women and putting them in positions of availability. But it doesn't mean many of the men's named in the files did anything illegal on their end. It is not illegal to sleep with a woman you met at a party. Most of these women were of legal age. That is why prosecution is so complicated in this area.

Andrew was arrested because he apparently shared government information. That can be prosecuted. Howard Lutnick lying about his association with Epstein is not prosecutable as he didn't lie under oath.

There are also many names in the Epstein files of people who clearly knew him but there is no evidence they actually did anything wrong and their greatest crime is having been friendly with him. That's Lutnick, so far. Or the Clintons. You don't arrest people simply for being known to having been at an Epstein party. Much of the reaction right now reeks more of a sanctimonious vigilante mob and Salem Witch trial mentality. Which is a shame as there were really unethical things Epstein and Maxwell did.

Of course! Let us expect nothing of the the most privileged amongst us! How ever could we expect people who vet everyone and every thing to consider the company they keep! How could they have known? The fact that everyone knew doesn’t mean they should have! /s just in case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files have become bigger than life, people are turning the files into something they want it to be rather than what they are.

We do know Epstein was "recruiting" young women and putting them in positions of availability. But it doesn't mean many of the men's named in the files did anything illegal on their end. It is not illegal to sleep with a woman you met at a party. Most of these women were of legal age. That is why prosecution is so complicated in this area.

Andrew was arrested because he apparently shared government information. That can be prosecuted. Howard Lutnick lying about his association with Epstein is not prosecutable as he didn't lie under oath.

There are also many names in the Epstein files of people who clearly knew him but there is no evidence they actually did anything wrong and their greatest crime is having been friendly with him. That's Lutnick, so far. Or the Clintons. You don't arrest people simply for being known to having been at an Epstein party. Much of the reaction right now reeks more of a sanctimonious vigilante mob and Salem Witch trial mentality. Which is a shame as there were really unethical things Epstein and Maxwell did.

It wasn’t just sex trafficking. Epstein had information on people, traded secrets, looks like he got inside info re: stock trades, and all sorts of other sketchy, grifting, illegal activities. Money laundering happens in many ways and Epstein should be looked at for that as well. Andrew wasn’t the only one sharing government or other secrets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love the King's response to this. So cold.

He wouldn't be the first heir to bring down the hammer on a sibling once their last parent had died.