Then you should be looking to revise the tax code. |
I’m guessing if OP is half as annoying when interacting with admissions people as she is on these boards her kids would be denied from every school no matter their other qualifications. No school wants a problem family. |
Thanks for admitting that your argument was bogus |
Why do private schools parents get so threatened whenever someone points out something about their system that's not ideal? |
That wasn’t me with the tax code argument. I am the one waiting for you to show where you have a right to this information. Or is that a bogus claim? |
Thanks for this. The Admissions Office granting admission to the "high drama" families sentences the faculty and staff to four or more unpleasant years of dealing with them. The more insistent, entitled and engaged you are in the process, the higher the likelihood the Admissions people are going to identify you as someone that will be an on-going challenge for staff, faculty and coaches throughout your DC's tenure. These groups sometimes look back at the Admissions staff and say, "How could you do this to us?" and "Couldn't you see these people were going to be problems?" |
It is not ideal for you, but the system works great for others. Your repeated arguments against a system you don’t understand are ineffective and just show your ignorance. |
| I think there are real concerns by parents on the transparency of the admission process in schools. For some reason some parents from private schools find the topic offensive, and like to bully the people that posts very reasonable arguments. I think the thread will benefit from providing good arguments rather than insults. |
I think you're confused about what a right is and where you get rights from, PP |
When all you have left are ad hominem attacks, you're losing |
Asking for clarification from OP about the source of the right they claim to have. Can you help OP? |
I don't see anything in OP's post about having a right to anything, so still can't follow what you're trying to get at here. OP's post: "I know several families who feel burned out by the admissions process and by being rejected multiple times by elite schools without really understanding the difference between their children and the admitted applicants. Is the system truly working, or is there room to improve transparency? Even if the process is highly competitive, I would feel much better if there were hard data to back up the rejection decisions. Do you have the same impression?" |
Not the PP, but his or her post is pretty much spot on. Don't like the rules of the game? Don't play. Admissions decisions are frequently much more subjective than objective and are in response to the many needs of the constituencies on campus. It's a combination of art and science and transparency isn't going to work. |
“I agree with that. I am not requesting the right of admission, but the right of receiving information, by the way.” Can you help this poster? Can OP? OP seems confused. |
If there is nothing to hide, the best policy is always transparency. As a previous poster mention, the process is draining and if you have information that you don’t satisfy some criteria in advance, you apply for another school. It saves time and energy to everyone. |