Oh and then math. I just think entire math curriculum at APS sucks. It’s not just an APS problem but a country wide issue. |
I totally agree. The APS math curriculum is basically non-existent. They need to invest in a rigorous curriculum that isn't entirely app based. I wish they'd find something rigorous and evidence-based with a logical progression. |
My kids go to ATS and ATS doesn’t use the math program that APS purchased, Envision or something like that. They rely on worksheets and apps. Based on what you said, this seems like it’s an APS wide issue. Why did APS purchase envision in the first place if no school is using it? And can we just get something better than a hodge podge of apps? |
Worksheets are how students get enough practice to really memorize content. Doing it on paper engages more parts of the brain and helps memorization more than typing it into a computer. |
I’m not anti worksheet. I’m wondering why APS purchased a curriculum that no one uses and whether there are better options out there than teachers just relying on worksheets and apps. |
That's not true. Choice schools have to max out their seats per class and the number of max seats per class at APS is higher over time in ES. I know because my kid got into APS in 4th b/c of class size increases. See page 2 of this document for details. https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/2025/01/Class-Size-Report-SY-24.25.pdf |
Let me help you out. If a kid gets into VPI and they have two older siblings, those kids get preference and so the total number of lower income kids goes up. That's why, even if VPI spots stay the same or go down, that probably won't impact T1 status as much as might be assumed. |
No idea why or how APS decides anything. "Math in Focus" is popular math curriculum. It is marketed as a kind Singapore Math, but colleagues from Singapore assure me it is not the same. It is actually used by some local private schools. If I were in charge, I would pick an actual Singapore Math curriculum. YMMV. |
One issue is the inflated Syphax admin staffing. One example surrounds “curriculum” admin employees. Their job is to assess and purchase the curriculum used by APS. You’d be shocked that if you hire an admin to constantly analyze curriculum you get lots of recommendations about this and that curriculum and the best of everything new. So APS CONSTANTLY changes which 7th grade math and which 5th reading and which 3rd grade spelling curriculum they are using. Teachers who like and know how a certain curriculum works get no say. They are told by Syphax and are constantly having to learn new curriculum to teach new curriculum. It’s insane, wasteful of good teachers knowledge, wasteful of taxpayer dollars (constantly purchasing new textbooks and curriculum). How about we decide what actually works and stick with for, I don’t know, years unless and until a large consensus of teachers tells admin it isn’t working. We could literally have one person do this job. |
No amount of funding or changes to the curriculum will help this. Unfortunately, in many cases, if the kid isn't good at math, it's an early parenting problem. I've seen too many kids who learn number sense and basic arithmetic way too late. It's not that hard to teach kids these basic things at a pretty early age at home for them to not struggle at elementary math. Waiting and expecting a teacher to do that job is too late and they've probably already fallen behind by then. |
I mostly disagree with this but there are some valid points. It is not fundamentally a parenting problem. The marh instruction does need to start early - in the case of APS basic numbers and math needs to start at K - and needs to build a solid foundation. It would help K a great deal to borrow one small thing from Montessori - the use of number rods in K so the child can visualize the numbers 1-10. Thise might be marked wood number rods of different lengths or Unifix Cubes. |
I completely disagree that this is somehow the main issue. I have a kid in middle school with excellent number sense and math ability and I hate the lack of a math curriculum. There's too much directing kids to YouTube videos, random websites, and apps to learn math. IXL problems aren't assigned in any particular order so math doesn't build. Basic concepts are entirely skipped by the teacher so i end up teaching them at home. It’s basically a random free for all. My kid is still learning because she's good at math and supported at home, but that's in spite of the nonexistent APS curriculum. It’s not how math should be taught. --STEM PhD |
I don't think this is true. We had no phonics and Lucy Calkins when my kids started in APS and that *had* to change becausethe prior model sucked and wasnt working. APS added a phonics curriculum (95Phonics) and CKLA. I'm not aware of other changes to language arts curriculum. For math, my kids have been bringing home unused Envision workbooks for at least 4 years. I'm not aware of any other APS math curriculum. As far as I can tell, APS doesn't use a math curriculum. Teachers just look for free options on the internet or on teachers paying teachers, and then in upper grades they assign IXL problems. In elementary, Dreambox is used to keep kids quiet after they finish their work. That's what we've got. It’s shameful. |
The results would be better and it would be lower cost to cut central office staff as outlined above. For any new curriculum, one cannot even evaluate degree of success/failure in less than about 5 years (approximately). It takes that long to bring a cohort of students from grade 1-5 so one has enough data and can make a valid analysis. This fundamentally is a leadership problem. If the Superintendent hires people whose job is to evaluate curricula, they will keep changing the curricula in order to keep having a job. |
| ATS parent here. The math curriculum in all of APS sucks. Sure at ATS students do better at SOLs but the bar is really low. ATS’s math curriculum is random and makes no sense. |