Oh, white woman. I pity you. Can anyone Google the position they're arguing? I mean really.... [url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/whos-face-dei-sure-not-060000528.html [/url] |
| pp, for your edification:https://www.yahoo.com/news/whos-face-dei-sure-not-060000528.html |
Minorities are also put off by the woke messaging. That's why they are voting republican at historic rates. They are still primarily voting democratic, but that support is eroding rather than increasing amid wokeness. Wokeness is inherently anti-male, and the working class isn't as susceptible to aspirations of performative maleness. That's mostly a middle class and UMC thing that doesn't resonate among the working class or the rich. |
Well stated! |
DP. The pp just told you she doesn't agree with non-merit based selections. She's not obligated to agree with it just because she's from a demographic that benefits from it. |
Wrong. How ignorant of you. |
+1 But no outrage. Strange. |
Nope. Just don't let MAGA, Fox News, Christopher Ruffo, and the right-wing media misuse the word and meaning. |
Best of luck in your speech policing crusade. |
This answer is like ChatGPT on meth. |
Please. If she thought it benefitted white people, she wouldn't have identified herself. |
White legacies have been doing that for centuries. Still do. |
So it's about righting the ship? |
This really epitomizes the issue people have with wokeness. If you look at this thread, the posters on the left aren't actually engaging with any of the answers posted by people critical of wokeness. They just saying things like this-- no analysis offered, entirely designed to insult and ridicule with no element of persuasion. And maybe most interestingly, the level of rhetoric is really fairly simplistic, yet they accuse everyone else of being uneducated and ignorant despite their own posts suggesting that they are the least educated posters. |