What happens if Marines are deployed in La?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If these immigrants are so hardworking, why aren’t they at their jobs on a Monday morning?

Why aren’t YOU doing YOUR job? Why are you wasting time on an anonymous message board on a Monday morning?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would the Marines need to be deployed of the protests were peaceful, as the Dems claim?

This is the point. They did not need to be deployed!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what stupid liberals and democrats need to understand. Trump wins on law & order and immigration every single time, repeat, every single time.

Mexican flag waving, car burning, masked illegals and gang members on the streets of LA and other cities is not something Americans want. Trumps wins every time on this, and CA polititians look like the idiots who is giving it to Trump just when his economic and trade agenda was falling off to add to his war with Musk. Idiot dems know how to lose every time.

Shut up RWNJ. Jan 6 is not law an order. Anyone who riots will get paid 5 million a person! Let’s go Taco!

Keep losing then! you can move to LA and find comfort among the illegals perhaps. Moderates will support T on this every single day. Idiot libs still don't get it.

Are you sure about that? If by “moderate” you mean “independent,” you aren’t correct.

From the recent CBS poll on attitudes toward immigration and mass deportation:

“Independents aren't as supportive of the deportation program as they were a couple of months ago, leaving the GOP base as the only partisan group with majority backing of the program now.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If these immigrants are so hardworking, why aren’t they at their jobs on a Monday morning?

Why aren’t you working right now?

Also, lots of low paying jobs have what’s called a night shift. You should open your circle and learn more about the way other people live.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ editorial board weighs in on the use of the military to quell protests.

“The California Governor is right that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was needlessly provocative in tweeting that Marines at Camp Pendleton are on alert to intervene if asked. The country doesn’t want the military patrolling American streets except in the worst circumstances. But Mr. Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military, as George H.W. Bush did to quell the 1992 L.A. riots, and our guess is that the President and Mr. Miller are looking for the chance.”

Yup, I tell everyone it’s hard to tell the WSJ reporting and editorials apart from NPR’s these days! Seriously, reports like this one in the WSJ give me hope.

“Reporting” from both the WSJ and NPR increasingly resemble The Onion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ editorial board weighs in on the use of the military to quell protests.

“The California Governor is right that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was needlessly provocative in tweeting that Marines at Camp Pendleton are on alert to intervene if asked. The country doesn’t want the military patrolling American streets except in the worst circumstances. But Mr. Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military, as George H.W. Bush did to quell the 1992 L.A. riots, and our guess is that the President and Mr. Miller are looking for the chance.”

Yup, I tell everyone it’s hard to tell the WSJ reporting and editorials apart from NPR’s these days! Seriously, reports like this one in the WSJ give me hope.

“Reporting” from both the WSJ and NPR increasingly resemble The Onion.

Please share where you get your balanced news so we too can avail of that information.

[Anonymous]

Why are people trying to compare this to Kent State.
This is not a college campus. These are not students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If these immigrants are so hardworking, why aren’t they at their jobs on a Monday morning?

Why aren’t YOU doing YOUR job? Why are you wasting time on an anonymous message board on a Monday morning?

Summer break!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would go be deployed to protect federal facilities. That is all.

Millions of Americans have served to prevent US military use against American citizens from happening. It would be a horrifying insult to every person that has ever served in the armed forces.

If American citizens are breaking the law and damaging property my tax dollars built and maintain then I say to the Marines, “Kick their stinking lawless brains out.”

Congrats, you are a POS. You probably already knew that.

Semper Fi, baby. Time to knock some heads and put a stop to this lawlessness. Actions now have consequences due to the new sheriff in town.

Just to be clear you are fine with Marines killing US citizens?

DP.

- are YOU fine with violent rioters (who may or may not be US citizens), murdering or trying to murder innocent federal employees of DHS? Because that is not a hypothetical; that is the fact on the ground at this moment.

Were YOU fine with violent rioters on January 6 that murdered police?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the marines will be told to shoot anyone with a flag that is not the American flag. Makes it easier to target.

Also if they have a weapon. Or a cell phone.

That’s what you get for thinking. Punished by your brain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ editorial board weighs in on the use of the military to quell protests.

“The California Governor is right that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was needlessly provocative in tweeting that Marines at Camp Pendleton are on alert to intervene if asked. The country doesn’t want the military patrolling American streets except in the worst circumstances. But Mr. Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military, as George H.W. Bush did to quell the 1992 L.A. riots, and our guess is that the President and Mr. Miller are looking for the chance.”

Yup, I tell everyone it’s hard to tell the WSJ reporting and editorials apart from NPR’s these days! Seriously, reports like this one in the WSJ give me hope.

“Reporting” from both the WSJ and NPR increasingly resemble The Onion.

For the record, the quoted piece from the Wall Street Journal was from an editorial article, not from a news article. The new articles in the WSJ are rated Center for media bias; the editorial pieces lean Right. The same article that that paragraph was quoted from included lots of digs against Democrats and Biden’s “open border policy.” If you bothered to read the full article you’d see that it basically lays blame at Biden’s feet for creating the conditions that have led to the immigration situation today, but it also faults the Trump administration for overreacting and for wanting to escalate things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If these immigrants are so hardworking, why aren’t they at their jobs on a Monday morning?

Why aren’t you working right now?

Also, lots of low paying jobs have what’s called a night shift. You should open your circle and learn more about the way other people live.

School administrators and teachers are on summer break here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are people trying to compare this to Kent State.
This is not a college campus. These are not students.

Because for those that were alive at the time, the memory of National Guard troops shooting at civilians is a painful one. Most Americans are not OK with federal troops or the National Guard firing lethal bullets at civilians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are people trying to compare this to Kent State.
This is not a college campus. These are not students.

Satrom, a Democrat, was elected in 1969 as the first full-time mayor of Kent, taking office in early 1970.


Five months later, after a night of rioting in the downtown area of Kent on May 1–2, 1970, he called Ohio Governor James A. Rhodes and requested that the National Guard be sent to the campus of Kent State University to deal with the unrest, which was mainly in response to April 29, 1970, announcement of the United States' invasion of Cambodia in the Vietnam War. The Guard was deployed to the campus on May 3 and the city was placed under martial law that evening. On May 4, while breaking up a mid-day protest on the campus, the Guardsmen shot into the crowd, killing four students and wounding nine others. The university was closed immediately and the city of Kent was placed under a 5:00 PM curfew with all entrances to the city blocked off.[3]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeRoy_Satrom

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP here. I am a moderate and am not in favor of anything T does, but lawlessness, illegal immigration, sanctuary cities, etc are not something I will support dems on. I am fully on board the crackdown with national guard or marines as they see fit to bring this under control. We are not letting LA into another Gaza, much like they tried to do with Columbia and Harvard. Idiots dems want the moderate support they better get over supporting these agendas, or else we turn the other way and let T do whatever he does. It's on you.

Is “we” Israel? So you are saying Israel is behind all of this? Sending the US military in to LA to get Hamas is exactly what caused Gaza. Using fake antisemitism to install pro Israeli administration at Harvard and Columbia is anti American.

You are a radical.

You are entitled to your opinion. I am a moderate and I will take pro Israeli every single day over pro Hamas appeasement. You can even call me a Paul Ryan type of Republican. I do not support T, but I do not support the lawlessness in LA supported by Newsome and Mayor Bass. Newsome BTW is done nationally. An utterly incapable politician who cannot solve problems in his state and instead invites T to meddle with the affairs.

lol you are a radical Israeli. Why are you posting about US politics?