What happens if Marines are deployed in La?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ editorial board weighs in on the use of the military to quell protests.

“The California Governor is right that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was needlessly provocative in tweeting that Marines at Camp Pendleton are on alert to intervene if asked. The country doesn’t want the military patrolling American streets except in the worst circumstances. But Mr. Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military, as George H.W. Bush did to quell the 1992 L.A. riots, and our guess is that the President and Mr. Miller are looking for the chance.”

Was it “needlessly proactive” when Tim Walz called up “National Guard stormtroopers” against the “mostly peaceful” blm rioters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are so worried for the mask wearing, Mexican flag waving, car burning, rock throwing illegal immigrants in LA they can barely contain their fear.

The Democratic Party are showing their true colors with their support (openly or tacitly) of these extremely violent and destructive riots.

The most ironic aspect is the democrats are directing their violence at innocent government workers.

Like MAGA did on Jan 6th?

[Anonymous]

George Floyd protests, J6, LA…Notice these things only happen while Trump is in office.

Not to put J6 in the same category as the others. But whether it is Rs or Ds, Trump is the only president who repeatedly instigates chaos and does absolutely nothing to tamp it down. In fact, he adds fuel to the flames every time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ editorial board weighs in on the use of the military to quell protests.

“The California Governor is right that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was needlessly provocative in tweeting that Marines at Camp Pendleton are on alert to intervene if asked. The country doesn’t want the military patrolling American streets except in the worst circumstances. But Mr. Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military, as George H.W. Bush did to quell the 1992 L.A. riots, and our guess is that the President and Mr. Miller are looking for the chance.”

Was it “needlessly proactive” when Tim Walz called up “National Guard stormtroopers” against the “mostly peaceful” blm rioters?

Tell me you don't know what a National Guard isn't without telling me you don't know what a National Guard is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would be deployed to protect federal facilities. That is all.

Millions of Americans have served to prevent US military use against American citizens from happening. It would be a horrifying insult to every person that has ever served in the armed forces.

We are talking about martial law here. This isn't "military use against American citizens" that you think it is. This is no different than the military protecting military installations. They are authorized to protect federal property and land. I've served in the military. We protect against enemies, both foreign and domestic. So yes, there may be times were American citizens are enemies. Anyone trying to break in to facilities, damage facilities, impede the government's ability to operate, or put federal employees safety at risk is, in fact, enemy of the government. And yes, this applies to the very tiny number of people on J6 that attempted to enter the building.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would be deployed to protect federal facilities. That is all.

Millions of Americans have served to prevent US military use against American citizens from happening. It would be a horrifying insult to every person that has ever served in the armed forces.

We are talking about martial law here. This isn't "military use against American citizens" that you think it is. This is no different than the military protecting military installations. They are authorized to protect federal property and land. I've served in the military. We protect against enemies, both foreign and domestic. So yes, there may be times were American citizens are enemies. Anyone trying to break in to facilities, damage facilities, impede the government's ability to operate, or put federal employees safety at risk is, in fact, enemy of the government. And yes, this applies to the very tiny number of people on J6 that attempted to enter the building.

CORRECTION....aren't talking about martial law here....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ editorial board weighs in on the use of the military to quell protests.

“The California Governor is right that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was needlessly provocative in tweeting that Marines at Camp Pendleton are on alert to intervene if asked. The country doesn’t want the military patrolling American streets except in the worst circumstances. But Mr. Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military, as George H.W. Bush did to quell the 1992 L.A. riots, and our guess is that the President and Mr. Miller are looking for the chance.”

Was it “needlessly proactive” when Tim Walz called up “National Guard stormtroopers” against the “mostly peaceful” blm rioters?

Was Tim Walz President of the U.S.?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:George Floyd protests, J6, LA…Notice these things only happen while Trump is in office.

- except that is not true, and everyone knows it.

- Ferguson riots / Michael Brown: 2014 / Obama

- Miami/ Florida riots, Travon Martin: 2012 / Obama (his DOJ was caught organizing the riots)

- first LA riots / Rodney King: 1992 / Billy Clinton,

Etc, etc, etc . . .

Democrats are the party of violence.

[Anonymous]

Why would the Marines need to be deployed of the protests were peaceful, as the Dems claim?

[Anonymous]

You had to go back to 1992 to match the three listed for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would go be deployed to protect federal facilities. That is all.

Millions of Americans have served to prevent US military use against American citizens from happening. It would be a horrifying insult to every person that has ever served in the armed forces.

If American citizens are breaking the law and damaging property my tax dollars built and maintain then I say to the Marines, “Kick their stinking lawless brains out.”

Congrats, you are a POS. You probably already knew that.

Semper Fi, baby. Time to knock some heads and put a stop to this lawlessness. Actions now have consequences due to the new sheriff in town.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][img]

[/img][/quote]

Can you not tell that these images have been manipulated? Are you that easy to manipulate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would be deployed to protect federal facilities. That is all.

Millions of Americans have served to prevent US military use against American citizens from happening. It would be a horrifying insult to every person that has ever served in the armed forces.

We are talking about martial law here. This isn't "military use against American citizens" that you think it is. This is no different than the military protecting military installations. They are authorized to protect federal property and land. I've served in the military. We protect against enemies, both foreign and domestic. So yes, there may be times were American citizens are enemies. Anyone trying to break in to facilities, damage facilities, impede the government's ability to operate, or put federal employees safety at risk is, in fact, enemy of the government. And yes, this applies to the very tiny number of people on J6 that attempted to enter the building.

Were the LA protestors damaging federal property and land?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would be deployed to protect federal facilities. That is all.

Millions of Americans have served to prevent US military use against American citizens from happening. It would be a horrifying insult to every person that has ever served in the armed forces.

We are talking about martial law here. This isn't "military use against American citizens" that you think it is. This is no different than the military protecting military installations. They are authorized to protect federal property and land. I've served in the military. We protect against enemies, both foreign and domestic. So yes, there may be times were American citizens are enemies. Anyone trying to break in to facilities, damage facilities, impede the government's ability to operate, or put federal employees safety at risk is, in fact, enemy of the government. And yes, this applies to the very tiny number of people on J6 that attempted to enter the building.

No sorry. there were no marines protecting anything or anyone from the J6ers. They were all pardoned.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][img]

[/img][/quote]

Can you not tell that these images have been manipulated? Are you that easy to manipulate?[/quote]

Where are the real photos? Link and post your claims?

cheap fakes? lmao.