A musical about Luigi Mangione is opening in San Francisco

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:quick poll - do more people on the left or the right condone violence along the lines that this person committed?

The violent ones are definitely on the left.

Right. Like J6 "protestors"?

Huh. The ones waltzing through the Capitol like sightseers w flags? lol.

Don’t go to Congo or Haiti and see actual “violence” in the streets or buildings. You might $hit a brick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:quick poll - do more people on the left or the right condone violence along the lines that this person committed?

I’m a dem. I do not condone what Mangione did, nor the fan girls that propped him up bc he’s mid good looking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are healthcare CEOs and Trump less guilty of killing people if they use denial of claims or destruction of research as a tool rather than a gun?

Good thought homework for Ethics class....

Healthcare “ceo” didn’t put the whole complex system in place. Whether paid by taxpayers, employers, people, or a mix, there will be terms of coverage, premiums/taxes, and constraints on treatment or care. Period.

Don’t be ignorant and naive to that.

Otherwise, go negotiate your own care and prices directly with the doctors. Go for it.

Or just beg for free treatment covered by someone else. That’s how you think it works anywhere in the world you are quite entitled.

Have to laugh, living on the dole with free everything (except his attorney fees) really suits Luigi. LWOP on the dole. Nice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does it have a happy ending where Luigi is executed?

No, jury nullification is the end.

The alternative ending is Karen cites all the press, websites, fundraisers, shows, musicals, memes, and chat rooms about poor Luigi Mangione and how he just cannot get a fair trial, boo hoo, and he’s freed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does it have a happy ending where Luigi is executed?

While i certainly do not condone what he did, I don’t think he should be executed.

Not because I oppose capital punishment - I DO believe in the death penalty. But I oppose it for him, in this particular case, because I’m absolutely certain he *wouldn’t* be facing the death penalty if he’d shot ME in the back. Or you. Because we’re both nobodies. And they wouldn’t have pursued a death penalty against him for killing me. But going for a death penalty in this case where he kills a rich CEO? That messaging tells me that my life isn’t as important as Thompson’s.

That is why I oppose his possible execution. Because he wouldn’t face death if he’d shot you or me.

You don’t get it.

Killing a representative of an industry whilst leaving labels bullets and Monopoly money, and then a Note to the Feds, is a highly deliberate political move designed to rile up the masses and create unrest.

Killing you and labeling some bullets with DCUM sux or DC puke would not incite that.

Hence the terrorism charge and politicalization out of the gate, by Luigi, on purpose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:quick poll - do more people on the left or the right condone violence along the lines that this person committed?

I’m a dem. I do not condone what Mangione did, nor the fan girls that propped him up bc he’s mid good looking.

He’s actually not that tall, he’s skinny, and his nose be nosing.

[Anonymous]

Looks really affect perception. He has a bunch of crazy fangirls and guys.

The police had to put out a warning for people to stop sending explicit pictures and fan mail to Luigi. If his jury is packed with women or gay men or millennials, he may walk

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leave it to San Francisco to make light of someone's murder.

Leave it to the U.S. healthcare system to profit off people’s health problems and not GAF if you get care or not as long as they make a profit.

Their profit was razor thin and barely existent. Learn some basic finance. After than go learn and compare quality of care, death panels and P&L of the various countries’ health insurance.

Liar. What a bunch of lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does it have a happy ending where Luigi is executed?

While i certainly do not condone what he did, I don’t think he should be executed.

Not because I oppose capital punishment - I DO believe in the death penalty. But I oppose it for him, in this particular case, because I’m absolutely certain he *wouldn’t* be facing the death penalty if he’d shot ME in the back. Or you. Because we’re both nobodies. And they wouldn’t have pursued a death penalty against him for killing me. But going for a death penalty in this case where he kills a rich CEO? That messaging tells me that my life isn’t as important as Thompson’s.

That is why I oppose his possible execution. Because he wouldn’t face death if he’d shot you or me.

You don’t get it.

Killing a representative of an industry whilst leaving labels bullets and Monopoly money, and then a Note to the Feds, is a highly deliberate political move designed to rile up the masses and create unrest.

Killing you and labeling some bullets with DCUM sux or DC puke would not incite that.

Hence the terrorism charge and politicalization out of the gate, by Luigi, on purpose.

The Parkland school shooter didn’t get the death penalty for killing 14 kids and 3 staff members. Come to think of it, I don’t think any school shooter has been threatened with the death penalty.

Yet, we’re supposed to believe the death of one CEO is worse than the massacre of a bunch of kids?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does it have a happy ending where Luigi is executed?

While i certainly do not condone what he did, I don’t think he should be executed.

Not because I oppose capital punishment - I DO believe in the death penalty. But I oppose it for him, in this particular case, because I’m absolutely certain he *wouldn’t* be facing the death penalty if he’d shot ME in the back. Or you. Because we’re both nobodies. And they wouldn’t have pursued a death penalty against him for killing me. But going for a death penalty in this case where he kills a rich CEO? That messaging tells me that my life isn’t as important as Thompson’s.

That is why I oppose his possible execution. Because he wouldn’t face death if he’d shot you or me.

You don’t get it.

Killing a representative of an industry whilst leaving labels bullets and Monopoly money, and then a Note to the Feds, is a highly deliberate political move designed to rile up the masses and create unrest.

Killing you and labeling some bullets with DCUM sux or DC puke would not incite that.

Hence the terrorism charge and politicalization out of the gate, by Luigi, on purpose.

The Parkland school shooter didn’t get the death penalty for killing 14 kids and 3 staff members. Come to think of it, I don’t think any school shooter has been threatened with the death penalty.

Yet, we’re supposed to believe the death of one CEO is worse than the massacre of a bunch of kids?

False equivalence.

What was the Parkland kills political message?

Did he label his shell casings with anti school or anti children book titles?

Did he run off on his own $5k e-bike and drop his $300 backpack full of anti-school game pieces?

Did he stalk and target specific children because he didn’t like where their parents worked?

Did he wear a mask and hoodie for 10 days leading up to his kill and stalk the school premises for days? Pay cash for everything? Use a fake id for everything?

Did he flee across state lines on buses with no cameras?

Did he have a written confession To The Feds in his coat pocket and a notebook diary of his hatred and killing plans?

Did he illegally print or buy a 3D gun and silencer?

Did he get a $1000/ hour criminal defense attorney marketing agent in two states?

No. No to all of these crimes and felonies. Parkland shooter outcast went bananas and grabbed someone’s gun and went to the only place he knew from his life.

Sad & tragic, but very very different from the above premeditated stalking, homicide and politiking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are healthcare CEOs and Trump less guilty of killing people if they use denial of claims or destruction of research as a tool rather than a gun?

Good thought homework for Ethics class....

Healthcare “ceo” didn’t put the whole complex system in place. Whether paid by taxpayers, employers, people, or a mix, there will be terms of coverage, premiums/taxes, and constraints on treatment or care. Period.

Don’t be ignorant and naive to that.

Otherwise, go negotiate your own care and prices directly with the doctors. Go for it.

Or just beg for free treatment covered by someone else. That’s how you think it works anywhere in the world you are quite entitled.

Have to laugh, living on the dole with free everything (except his attorney fees) really suits Luigi. LWOP on the dole. Nice.

You forget that UHC is not a generic representative of the healthcare industry.

"An analysis by ValuePenguin suggests that UnitedHealthcare...denies a staggering 32 percent of claims. That's twice the industry average, and more than any other insurer."


https://futurism.com/neoscope/insurance-ceo-gloating-deny-care

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:quick poll - do more people on the left or the right condone violence along the lines that this person committed?

I’m a dem. I do not condone what Mangione did, nor the fan girls that propped him up bc he’s mid good looking.

He’s actually not that tall, he’s skinny, and his nose be nosing.

Lol. True per social media. So it must be true!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are healthcare CEOs and Trump less guilty of killing people if they use denial of claims or destruction of research as a tool rather than a gun?

Good thought homework for Ethics class....

Healthcare “ceo” didn’t put the whole complex system in place. Whether paid by taxpayers, employers, people, or a mix, there will be terms of coverage, premiums/taxes, and constraints on treatment or care. Period.

Don’t be ignorant and naive to that.

Otherwise, go negotiate your own care and prices directly with the doctors. Go for it.

Or just beg for free treatment covered by someone else. That’s how you think it works anywhere in the world you are quite entitled.

Have to laugh, living on the dole with free everything (except his attorney fees) really suits Luigi. LWOP on the dole. Nice.

You forget that UHC is not a generic representative of the healthcare industry.

"An analysis by ValuePenguin suggests that UnitedHealthcare...denies a staggering 32 percent of claims. That's twice the industry average, and more than any other insurer."


https://futurism.com/neoscope/insurance-ceo-gloating-deny-care

Super, go investigate that. Get the date, get the health distribution of their customers, get what they decided, get their total volume….. and compare those qualities to other health insurance plans.

Ie Kaiser won’t take ill people, it’s its own group.

Ie anyone with an ACA customer base must entire healthy people to pay in to cover all the obese and sickly customers who don’t pay in enough.

On and on. Do a real study.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are healthcare CEOs and Trump less guilty of killing people if they use denial of claims or destruction of research as a tool rather than a gun?

Good thought homework for Ethics class....

Healthcare “ceo” didn’t put the whole complex system in place. Whether paid by taxpayers, employers, people, or a mix, there will be terms of coverage, premiums/taxes, and constraints on treatment or care. Period.

Don’t be ignorant and naive to that.

Otherwise, go negotiate your own care and prices directly with the doctors. Go for it.

Or just beg for free treatment covered by someone else. That’s how you think it works anywhere in the world you are quite entitled.

Have to laugh, living on the dole with free everything (except his attorney fees) really suits Luigi. LWOP on the dole. Nice.

You forget that UHC is not a generic representative of the healthcare industry.

"An analysis by ValuePenguin suggests that UnitedHealthcare...denies a staggering 32 percent of claims. That's twice the industry average, and more than any other insurer."

https://futurism.com/neoscope/insurance-ceo-gloating-deny-care

Is DOGE looking into fraud claim and disability fraud from doctors yet? Especially public union fraud?

Can’t wait.

[Anonymous]

No such thing as an unnecessary procedure! Or a low efficacy or unnecessary operation or therapy! Make them all free!

Free Healthcare and free prescriptions drugs are a human right!