Stop with the fkggg generalizations. My sons have chores and have been independently handling their own school work/assignments since elementary school. They are active in community service and sports. Firstborn was accepted unhooked into multiple T10/20 schools and is top of his class in college. Younger son rising Senior in HS is the same. In UMC-wealthy - they do not find these discrepancies between the sexes. The boys are thriving. We have overlooked a big segment of lower SES males and public school constrainments/initiatives and community are the problem. Also- single parent/broken homes, lack of male role models in the low SES communities. |
| Have they done studies on the role of sports influences on education? Because what I see is a larger role of sports playing into the hours that a male boy during his school years. A lot of boys spend hours a day on sports. They only have so much energy left for academics. |
Shut the hell up- girls are playing travel soccer, club volleyball, basketball and dance at the same level and hours…. I was back in the late 80s |
Because the parents of those boys have higher expectations, both in behavior and academics. |
+100 99.1% go on to 4 year college ar my sons’ all male HS. At our local public- boys are going at the same rate as girls. Frankly, I can’t name a single boy in our neighborhood, sports teams, in the larger community, nephews, etc- that haven’t enrolled (and graduated) from a 4-year college. This isn’t happening in UMC—it is a big problem if boys falling through the cracks in low class-lower MC |
Because in public schools you get kids of parents who have low expectations of their kids' behavior and academics, and blame teachers or the system if the kids don't do well. -parent of teen DS and DD in public school who know they are expected to behave and study |
I agree- but my sons have lots of friends at our local large public HS who are just like them (parents have the same expectations for them). |
Now he's just starting to sound creepy. And lazy. Nice combo. |
| I’m divorced UMC with a son (father is college-educated, lives nearby and is involved). I will admit that this isn’t the optimal family situation. I will also admit that my kid is more privileged than most. Finally, I’ll admit that a lot of things brought up in this thread are true. However, to tag people like my son (high stats, leader. at a top college) as doomed and on the off-ramp, isn’t constructive or fair. Life happens, kids (both genders) face all kinds of challenges regardless of their family set-up. Let’s focus on improving the schools and teaching drive, coping skills and resilience, for the benefit of BOTH boys and girls. |
My vote is increased screen time, decreasing attention span and limiting the ability to be at ease while bored. |
DP but I don’t agree. I sent my daughter to all girls private because I formally believe in the value of same sex education - for both boys and girls. Unfortunately for me our area doesn’t offer an equivalent all boys school for my sons or I would have sent them for sure. |
| Boys were more academically successful back then for a number of reasons. I tried to limit my son’s screen time and encourage books and trips to the library and local cultural events. I refused to let him have an IPAD or phone until he was older- and I got pushback from a lot of people fir that. Whether any of this made a difference, I don’t know (he’s ‘24), but I think we as a society have normalized dependence on electronics for young kids. It can be even more challenging for boys who aren’t interested in sports- at least sports get kids away from their electronics. |
+1 |
To be fair the “single parent” was in the context of low SES where one parent/father never was involved. Studies show that is a huge hurdle —not in your class bracket |
| More men are MAGA. They are anti-college. It will get worse. |