Wait, what? AG Pam Bondi just “charged” NY Gov. Kathy Hochul and Letitia James

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She really is a dope, who's way in over her head. This may be the only thing that will save us - that most of Trump's appointments don't know what the f they're doing.

Apparently DOJ has brought some kind of civil action about immigration - like what they did against Illinois I guess. But no one's been "charged."

Poor DOJ. There’s a lot of dedicated public servants there who are going to be asked to do things that strain the bounds of credibility and ethics

Where is the ABA in all of this? Shouldn't the ABA start proceedings to disbar attorneys who file frivilous lawsuits, or who break the law? Isn't that part of the code of Legal Ethics that the ABA is supposed to enforce?

Well yes. And it ultimately happened to a bunch of the Trump 2020 election attorneys. But it takes time. And the ABA is hesitant to tell the US attorney she’s insane. Less hesitant to tell the underlings, which is why they all jumped ship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She really is a dope, who's way in over her head. This may be the only thing that will save us - that most of Trump's appointments don't know what the f they're doing.

Apparently DOJ has brought some kind of civil action about immigration - like what they did against Illinois I guess. But no one's been "charged."

Poor DOJ. There’s a lot of dedicated public servants there who are going to be asked to do things that strain the bounds of credibility and ethics

Where is the ABA in all of this? Shouldn't the ABA start proceedings to disbar attorneys who file frivilous lawsuits, or who break the law? Isn't that part of the code of Legal Ethics that the ABA is supposed to enforce?

The ABA is a union. It can't disbar anyone.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disbarment

+1. You need the state bar to really get anywhere. Anyone see the Florida state bar raising a fuss here? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? bueller?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

Trump has lost over 98 percent in court the only ones sucking it up is taxpayers paying for these unconstitutional lawsuits fool

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

Trump has lost over 98 percent in court the only ones sucking it up is taxpayers paying for these unconstitutional lawsuits fool

Trump loses the vast majority of his Administrative Procedures Act Cases. Which is kind of like losing in small claims Court. When the other party doesn’t show up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She really is a dope, who's way in over her head. This may be the only thing that will save us - that most of Trump's appointments don't know what the f they're doing.

Apparently DOJ has brought some kind of civil action about immigration - like what they did against Illinois I guess. But no one's been "charged."

Poor DOJ. There’s a lot of dedicated public servants there who are going to be asked to do things that strain the bounds of credibility and ethics

Do you realize how many attorney have resigned? Whole sections. “Because Pam Nondi told me to do it” does not protect your law license (or your soul) if you aren’t fully truthful to the Court.

I think this might be one of the reasons Trump extorted so many law firms for legal representation. If DOJ attorneys continue to leave , the administration will require a new crop of skilled attorneys to argue their positions. In comes the big guns that sold their remaining souls to Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL, they weren't "charged" with anything. At best, this is a civil suit.

She is either an ignorant AG or she is using terminology to make her sound tough because she is a Trump sycophant.

Porque no los dos?

¡Exactamente!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How does Bondi live with herself?

Because no one else will. Two husbands, twice divorced. No kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

Why not go after the employers in Florida, Texas, the Imperial Valley who hire undocumented immigrants? They ar einducing these people to come. Not New York. Why not fine and jail those guys?

I bet you don't want to go after them because they are MAGA voters, right?

NY spent more time prosecuting Trump on baloney than enforcing the law. Thats why.

[Anonymous]

What day it’s been. State complaint.

https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article307770070.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this just another stupid maga publicity stunt?

Bet they misspelled NYC. These people could never work for the private sector.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

Why not go after the employers in Florida, Texas, the Imperial Valley who hire undocumented immigrants? They ar einducing these people to come. Not New York. Why not fine and jail those guys?

I bet you don't want to go after them because they are MAGA voters, right?

NY spent more time prosecuting Trump on baloney than enforcing the law. Thats why.

Okay you and your law degree from Trump University will only make you need a lawyer. Your world is falling apart. Better storm the capital again!

[Anonymous]

Can not wait to see Bondi getting her head shaved in an El Salvador in prison. She is way over her skis.

[Anonymous]

Indicted for what?

[Anonymous]

Pam Bondi is going after Letitia James. James' office is under investigation by Washington DOJ and grand jury investigation. Subpoenas sent to James' office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this just another stupid maga publicity stunt?

Anything to distract from Epstein.