Wait, what? AG Pam Bondi just “charged” NY Gov. Kathy Hochul and Letitia James

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

No. Democracy back in order.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

Hardly. Inflation increase three percent since the chief Maggot took office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!

You are a fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL, they weren't "charged" with anything. At best, this is a civil suit.

She is either an ignorant AG or she is using terminology to make her sound tough because she is a Trump sycophant.

Porque no los dos?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!

You are a fool.

Nope just pointing how MAGAs don’t care about the country, they just want to get back at the libs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL, they weren't "charged" with anything. At best, this is a civil suit.

She is either an ignorant AG or she us using terminology to make her sound tough because she is a Trump sycophant.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

Because it’s not about the immigrants. It’s completely hypocritical to go after NY but not red states who look the other way re: illegal immigrants working on farms or chicken/meat industries. It’s about going after people who criticized Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

Why not go after the employers in Florida, Texas, the Imperial Valley who hire undocumented immigrants? They ar einducing these people to come. Not New York. Why not fine and jail those guys?

I bet you don't want to go after them because they are MAGA voters, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

Because it’s not about the immigrants. It’s completely hypocritical to go after NY but not red states who look the other way re: illegal immigrants working on farms or chicken/meat industries. It’s about going after people who criticized Trump.

BINGO!!!

Democracy is dying because the elected president will not follow the rules of the land and is a narcissist obsessed with revenge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!

Yes. It's just all about hatred.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!

yes the libs being owned and no trans people in bathrooms is for sure the most important.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She really is a dope, who's way in over her head. This may be the only thing that will save us - that most of Trump's appointments don't know what the f they're doing.

Apparently DOJ has brought some kind of civil action about immigration - like what they did against Illinois I guess. But no one's been "charged."

Poor DOJ. There’s a lot of dedicated public servants there who are going to be asked to do things that strain the bounds of credibility and ethics

For sure. And worse they are going to have to keep showing up in court trying to defend it only for judges to say no or throw it out of court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

Like the house GOO adding $4T in debt?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

No. Democracy back in order.

You’re an idiot. Democracy is not back in order.
Ever wonder if you were in Nazi Germany during WW2 what you would have done?
I can give you the answer. You would have welcomed Hitler….(cough… Orange Cheeto).