Wait, what? AG Pam Bondi just “charged” NY Gov. Kathy Hochul and Letitia James

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One very sad silver lining to this contemptible administration is the incompetence of the cruel leaders that the Pusticle has put in place. Bondi is a pathetic "attorney". She doesn't seem to understand law. Her law school, Stetson University College of Law, is ranked #98 in law schools. She's a member of the Florida bar, where they take the bar exam in crayon.

#98 ?

Under which system; USNWR ratings? If so, Stetson is tied with American University’s law school, which is excellent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One very sad silver lining to this contemptible administration is the incompetence of the cruel leaders that the Pusticle has put in place. Bondi is a pathetic "attorney". She doesn't seem to understand law. Her law school, Stetson University College of Law, is ranked #98 in law schools. She's a member of the Florida bar, where they take the bar exam in crayon.

#98 ?

Under which system; USNWR ratings? If so, Stetson is tied with American University’s law school, which is excellent.

The USNWR rankings are utterly meaningless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

While I hate all things Trump, if NY does have a law on the books that notifies immigrants when federal authorities request their records, that could be seen as obstruction. The feds have a lawful right to enforce immigration. States don't have to help at all. Zero. But they cannot obstruct.

How is serving notice of legal action "obstruction"?

Do people not have a right to know who is peeking at their personal information?

I said "could" be considered obstruction. Depends on the circumstances. But if the feds are conducting a legitimate investigation, they can request certain records for "investigative purposes." They generally need a subpoena or warrant, but not always. They could ask for your cell phone records, for example, thinking that you are distributing fentanyl across state lines. And want to see the numbers you call and cell towers you are pinging off of. And so on. If the cell phone company notifies you of that, you are going to be able to alter your behavior so that it's less likely you get caught. Same with driver's records (and addresses!).

The problem is, New York's law provided a really easy way to track down undocumented immigrants. An unintended negative consequence of a well-meaning idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She really is a dope, who's way in over her head. This may be the only thing that will save us - that most of Trump's appointments don't know what the f they're doing.

Apparently DOJ has brought some kind of civil action about immigration - like what they did against Illinois I guess. But no one's been "charged."

+10000000000000000000000000000000000

[CommonSense]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!

You are a fool.

Nope just pointing how MAGAs don’t care about the country, they just want to get back at the libs.

If we didn't care about the country, we would have let you continue to destroy it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Finally! Back to Law & Order.

There’s a felon in the White House…

[CommonSense]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

While I hate all things Trump, if NY does have a law on the books that notifies immigrants when federal authorities request their records, that could be seen as obstruction. The feds have a lawful right to enforce immigration. States don't have to help at all. Zero. But they cannot obstruct.

Privacy Protections
"The law provides a number of privacy protections that limit data sharing, including to agencies that primarily enforce immigration laws, and requires disclosure to the license holders when immigration enforcement agencies request data from DMV."

https://dmv.ny.gov/driver-license/driver-licenses-and-the-green-light-law

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

While I hate all things Trump, if NY does have a law on the books that notifies immigrants when federal authorities request their records, that could be seen as obstruction. The feds have a lawful right to enforce immigration. States don't have to help at all. Zero. But they cannot obstruct.

Upon receiving a request for such records or information from an agency that primarily enforces immigration law, the commissioner shall, no later than three days after such request, notify the individual about whom such information was requested, informing such individual of the request and the identity of the agency that made such request.

[Anonymous]

I think you MAGAs will regret that Trump opened the door for revenge politics fairly soon.

What goes around comes around, and let's be honest, we're smarter than you and not as dirty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She really is a dope, who's way in over her head. This may be the only thing that will save us - that most of Trump's appointments don't know what the f they're doing.

Apparently DOJ has brought some kind of civil action about immigration - like what they did against Illinois I guess. But no one's been "charged."

Poor DOJ. There’s a lot of dedicated public servants there who are going to be asked to do things that strain the bounds of credibility and ethics

Do you realize how many attorney have resigned? Whole sections. “Because Pam Nondi told me to do it” does not protect your law license (or your soul) if you aren’t fully truthful to the Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jesus. Does Bondi really not know the difference between charges and a lawsuit?!

The Constitution quite clearly delegated this to the Feds, and it isn’t a responsibility that can be re-designated to states with a magic wand. This will fail in court.

Next!

She’s the standard dumb blonde trumper. It’s like they make them in a factory or something.

And the dumb blonde Press Secretary. Lol.

And the dumb brunette who shot her dog and can’t keep trash of her purse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She seems very confused.

Everyone competent at DOJ has been fired or resigned. Turns out you can fudge facts in federal court and remain a lawyer in good standing. Lawyers work hard for their licenses. They tend to draw the time at things that will get them sanctioned and disbarred.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.

Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…

Hahahahaha


How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.

So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.

No problem here.

Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.

While I hate all things Trump, if NY does have a law on the books that notifies immigrants when federal authorities request their records, that could be seen as obstruction. The feds have a lawful right to enforce immigration. States don't have to help at all. Zero. But they cannot obstruct.

IF they do, the thing that doesn’t get laughed out of Court is challenging the law. “Charging” the governor is insane. As in the Court order dismissing this read. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. And LOL. Thanks for pick me up. I needed a good laugh. Dismissed.