Kamala Harris for President

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does Harris stand for? My mom and I were talking and she mused that Kamala was left of Biden. But what are her positions? What does she bring to the table that’s fresh? My mom couldn’t answer.

I’d love to have a woman president, but I don’t recall much from her 2020 campaign. She was my last choice out of all the other woman candidates, and I can tell you their positions.

She's not Trump.

That’s hardly enough.

Yes it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The grassroots energy is unlike anything we've seen since 2008. I love it!

There is nothing "grassroots" about this.

People are really good at lying to themselves. It's hope and desperation.

$81 million in donations in less than 24 hours given in sums smaller than $200 is certainly grassroots.

Mmmhmm. We'll see.

See what? That's a huge number. Bigger than anything Trump has done in a 24 hour period.

Do you always get excited about these silly ephemeral mirages? This is a highly coordinated rollout by insiders and Democratic political elites. In case you haven't noticed already, people are sick of elites in this country. The same people that told us Biden was healthy had vibrant are now trying to fool everything into believing that Kamala is some political savant, like we didn't see the calamitous race in 2020 where her candidacy got skewered by Tulis Gabbard of all people. She is not that girl, not matter how much you try to lie t yourself.

$81 million in 24 hours from small donors isn't an ephemeral mirage... it's more than half a million people.

But also, no one is saying she's a poltiical savant. They're saying she's not Donald Trump. She has the lowest bar in the world to get over.

Half a million people…..all in blue states.

888,000 donations > 500,000. By bigly. I know MaGA don’t math, but come on.

Also, I’m seeing lots of Tx and FL donations reported. If you have a state by state breakdown from a reliable source that shows otherwise, please post it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The grassroots energy is unlike anything we've seen since 2008. I love it!

There is nothing "grassroots" about this.

People are really good at lying to themselves. It's hope and desperation.

$81 million in donations in less than 24 hours given in sums smaller than $200 is certainly grassroots.

Mmmhmm. We'll see.

See what? That's a huge number. Bigger than anything Trump has done in a 24 hour period.

Do you always get excited about these silly ephemeral mirages? This is a highly coordinated rollout by insiders and Democratic political elites. In case you haven't noticed already, people are sick of elites in this country. The same people that told us Biden was healthy had vibrant are now trying to fool everything into believing that Kamala is some political savant, like we didn't see the calamitous race in 2020 where her candidacy got skewered by Tulis Gabbard of all people. She is not that girl, not matter how much you try to lie t yourself.

You think almost 900,000 small money donors were all elites? How many elites do you think this country has? At some point, you plus a million of your buddies aren’t that elite. You become ordinary people.

The point is, it has to translate to votes! At one point in the 2020 race Kamala was the favorite and was beating everything in fundraising. It didn't translate. It doesn't translate with her. That is what is ephemeral. Given what has transpired over the last month, this sort of bump would have happened with anyone that wasn't Joe Biden. What you are seeing now is collective sight of relief, combined with grasping for hope/desperation to beat Trump. It's not a Kamala thing; don't be fooled.

No she wasn't beating anyone in fundraising at any point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MARTIN: So the campaign said it had $240 million on hand at the start of this month. You recently posted on X, formally Twitter, and I'm quoting - you were quoting from the regulations here. You said, if the candidate is not a candidate in the general election, all contributions made for the general election shall be either returned or refunded to the contributors or redesignated or reattributed as appropriate. So what does that mean? Can Harris use that money?

COOKSEY: Well, I think it's really complicated, is the short answer. I mean, we take a step back to consider the situation - this is really unprecedented in terms of modern political history, and certainly in terms of campaign finance law. We have a presidential nominee or a presumptive nominee dropping out just weeks before his party convention. And he's - what he's attempting to do is to give his entire committee, the cash and all the assets...

MARTIN: Yeah.

COOKSEY: ...Over to another person.

MARTIN: We get that. So can she use that money?

COOKSEY: Well, again, I think it's going to have to go through a process through the FEC. I think I expect there's going to be probably challenges to that at the agency and probably in the courts, as well.

MARTIN: So your colleague, the Democratic vice chair of the FEC, Ellen Weintraub, told us yesterday that candidates running for president and vice president share a campaign committee. Kamala Harris has always been listed as a candidate on this committee. Now, Weintraub didn't draw any conclusion from that, but, I mean, a lot of people are interpreting that to say that she has a legitimate claim to those funds.

COOKSEY: Yeah, I think some lawyers have reached that conclusion. I think other election law experts have actually reached the opposite conclusion in publications like The Wall Street Journal. And so I think everyone would agree, though, that this is completely unprecedented, and it raises a lot of novel questions.


https://nypost.com/2024/07/22/us-news/fec-chair-predicts-legal-challenges-if-kamala-harris-tries-to-access-bidens-war-chest/

This is all false. Harris is a trustee of Biden-Harris 2024. Biden removing himself does not limit Harris;s access to the money or infrastructure that has been established.

[Anonymous]

Yesterday I was speaking with our neighbors. They are in their 70s and told me in 2020 and again yesterday that they had been lifetime Republican voters. In 2016 they voted for Trump with the belief that he would surround himself with strong advisers to whom he would listen. They turned into Never Trumpers. In 2020 they voted for Biden because they don’t want Trump. Yesterday the wife shared with me the same history and said she was worried Trump was ongoing to win but she and her husband will definitely be voting for Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does Harris stand for? My mom and I were talking and she mused that Kamala was left of Biden. But what are her positions? What does she bring to the table that’s fresh? My mom couldn’t answer.

I’d love to have a woman president, but I don’t recall much from her 2020 campaign. She was my last choice out of all the other woman candidates, and I can tell you their positions.

She's not Trump.

That’s hardly enough.

But here's some more details:

- continuing the strictest border policies of any american president that Biden established
- continuing the massive economic success of Biden
- continuing to protect our friends and interests in Ukraine and Taiwan
- not disbanding NATO
- lower taxes for middle and lower class
- protecting a woman's right to choose

What else do you need to know? She DOES have a campaign website where you can see her positions.

[Anonymous]

She’s just so ridiculous. I hear about her experience and being a prosecutor and a senator and how she has been Biden’s partner and blah blah blah.

But her laugh. It’s so off-putting. Plus she just doesn’t look or sound like a President. There’s astroturfed “excitement” right now, but it’s going to fall away when they hear her laugh and think about her DEI career.

The media is desperate for a horse race, but it isn’t happening. SCOTUS won’t let her take any shortcuts to use the money, and her campaign will implode as people hear that silly laugh. People better realize Trump is going to have a mandate to clear out Democrats, so they better MAGA now.

[Anonymous]

On a scale of 1 to 10 I was enthused about a four for Biden. I was going to do it but more out of obligation.... I'm a six for Kamala right now. We'll see who she has for vice president..... Either way, I'm voting for her, but I would love to see some young up-and-coming person energized the Democratic party

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MARTIN: So the campaign said it had $240 million on hand at the start of this month. You recently posted on X, formally Twitter, and I'm quoting - you were quoting from the regulations here. You said, if the candidate is not a candidate in the general election, all contributions made for the general election shall be either returned or refunded to the contributors or redesignated or reattributed as appropriate. So what does that mean? Can Harris use that money?

COOKSEY: Well, I think it's really complicated, is the short answer. I mean, we take a step back to consider the situation - this is really unprecedented in terms of modern political history, and certainly in terms of campaign finance law. We have a presidential nominee or a presumptive nominee dropping out just weeks before his party convention. And he's - what he's attempting to do is to give his entire committee, the cash and all the assets...

MARTIN: Yeah.

COOKSEY: ...Over to another person.

MARTIN: We get that. So can she use that money?

COOKSEY: Well, again, I think it's going to have to go through a process through the FEC. I think I expect there's going to be probably challenges to that at the agency and probably in the courts, as well.

MARTIN: So your colleague, the Democratic vice chair of the FEC, Ellen Weintraub, told us yesterday that candidates running for president and vice president share a campaign committee. Kamala Harris has always been listed as a candidate on this committee. Now, Weintraub didn't draw any conclusion from that, but, I mean, a lot of people are interpreting that to say that she has a legitimate claim to those funds.

COOKSEY: Yeah, I think some lawyers have reached that conclusion. I think other election law experts have actually reached the opposite conclusion in publications like The Wall Street Journal. And so I think everyone would agree, though, that this is completely unprecedented, and it raises a lot of novel questions.


https://nypost.com/2024/07/22/us-news/fec-chair-predicts-legal-challenges-if-kamala-harris-tries-to-access-bidens-war-chest/

This is all false. Harris is a trustee of Biden-Harris 2024. Biden removing himself does not limit Harris;s access to the money or infrastructure that has been established.

yeah, it's already done.

And if it wasn't, the money could be transferred to the party and spent by them to support her candidacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The grassroots energy is unlike anything we've seen since 2008. I love it!

There is nothing "grassroots" about this.

People are really good at lying to themselves. It's hope and desperation.

$81 million in donations in less than 24 hours given in sums smaller than $200 is certainly grassroots.

Mmmhmm. We'll see.

See what? That's a huge number. Bigger than anything Trump has done in a 24 hour period.

Do you always get excited about these silly ephemeral mirages? This is a highly coordinated rollout by insiders and Democratic political elites. In case you haven't noticed already, people are sick of elites in this country. The same people that told us Biden was healthy had vibrant are now trying to fool everything into believing that Kamala is some political savant, like we didn't see the calamitous race in 2020 where her candidacy got skewered by Tulis Gabbard of all people. She is not that girl, not matter how much you try to lie t yourself.

You think almost 900,000 small money donors were all elites? How many elites do you think this country has? At some point, you plus a million of your buddies aren’t that elite. You become ordinary people.

The point is, it has to translate to votes! At one point in the 2020 race Kamala was the favorite and was beating everything in fundraising. It didn't translate. It doesn't translate with her. That is what is ephemeral. Given what has transpired over the last month, this sort of bump would have happened with anyone that wasn't Joe Biden. What you are seeing now is collective sight of relief, combined with grasping for hope/desperation to beat Trump. It's not a Kamala thing; don't be fooled.

No she wasn't beating anyone in fundraising at any point.

+1. And that was a problem. People setting furnishing records don’t drop out before the race really starts.

It shows the enthusiasm is there. Now it’s on Harris to keep it going.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does Harris stand for? My mom and I were talking and she mused that Kamala was left of Biden. But what are her positions? What does she bring to the table that’s fresh? My mom couldn’t answer.

I’d love to have a woman president, but I don’t recall much from her 2020 campaign. She was my last choice out of all the other woman candidates, and I can tell you their positions.

She's not Trump.

That’s hardly enough.

Yes it is.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s just so ridiculous. I hear about her experience and being a prosecutor and a senator and how she has been Biden’s partner and blah blah blah.

But her laugh. It’s so off-putting. Plus she just doesn’t look or sound like a President. There’s astroturfed “excitement” right now, but it’s going to fall away when they hear her laugh and think about her DEI career.

The media is desperate for a horse race, but it isn’t happening. SCOTUS won’t let her take any shortcuts to use the money, and her campaign will implode as people hear that silly laugh. People better realize Trump is going to have a mandate to clear out Democrats, so they better MAGA now.

If you don't like people who don't look and act presidential and have sketchy personal histories... I've got some BAD news about the other guy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yesterday I was speaking with our neighbors. They are in their 70s and told me in 2020 and again yesterday that they had been lifetime Republican voters. In 2016 they voted for Trump with the belief that he would surround himself with strong advisers to whom he would listen. They turned into Never Trumpers. In 2020 they voted for Biden because they don’t want Trump. Yesterday the wife shared with me the same history and said she was worried Trump was ongoing to win but she and her husband will definitely be voting for Harris.

I know my friends who are vote blue no matter who.

inflation, immigration crisis and their business failing because of Biden's covid policies was enough for them.

They think Harris is a twit. There is no way they will vote Blue again as long as she's the nominee.

They liked Trump's populist polices as they're blue collar democrats. They know the democrat party has left them in favor of rich Wall St elites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought we should start a new thread on her historic run. I'll start.

Kamala Harris+DNC raised $81 million in 24 hours.

Of the 888,000 donors who gave to Kamala Harris in the last 24 hours, *60%* made their *first* contribution.

That's roughly *532,800* Americans who went out of their way to donate to Kamala's campaign.

We're gonna crush the fascists. Be scared, be very scared.

"Democracy" is being saved. This is the type of enthusiasm needed to save us all from that FOO (felonorangeoldie)!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look, Kamala is what she is, my concerns are about Trump's health. He's the oldest person to ever run for president in US history. 250 years!

And he's gone MIA since Biden dropped out—where is the guy, shouldn't he be making public appearances assuring people that his age is not a problem as it appeared to be at the debate?

Well he got shot and he is doing better. Biden couldn’t handle stairs.

Speaking of dementia Joe, where is he? All of a sudden he’s in Vegas and then rushed out?

Sources are saying he collapses in a restaurant. I’m thinking he’s in a coma or he’s out. And leaving us in the hands of Harris? Oh my that’s scary.

We knew this would happen. We knew that Harris was one stroke or one Parkinson’s attack from being POTUS. And now that’s what we have

He's in Rehoboth... he was seen there yesterday on the beach. He's not a candidate, he doesn't need to be on the campaign trail. But Trump sure as heck should be!

Yeah, he had COVID so he is doing the right thing and staying out of public. What do you want him to be doing?

https://apnews.com/article/biden-covid-rehoboth-beach-harris-2024-ef4d643927247c59868607a80129c190

The president was last seen in public late Wednesday after arriving at a U.S. air base in Dover, Delaware, after testing positive for COVID-19 while campaigning in Las Vegas earlier in the day. He then motorcaded to his vacation home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware. The White House says Biden plans to return to the White House on Tuesday afternoon.