| Another thing that would be helpful about improving the pipeline of candidates is that it would make the diocese schools more confident about replacing weak or problematic teachers with great teachers. |
|
Well, one problem is, there’s ZERO discussion from the school that there’s even a problem! No townhalls, no mention in the weekly Messenger emails, no discussion at HSA meetings. Nothing. No attempt at outreach to parents about the problem or how to solve it.
Just pretending like everything’s hunky - dory, when everyone knows it’s not, and the constant emails asking for $$$$. So don’t expect the problem to be solved anytime soon! They won’t even acknowledge that there is one! |
|
We need a good RECESSION (preferably a depression). Way too much inflation, distortion in the labor markets, $25/hr school bus drivers, housing costs out of control, etc.
A nice, lengthy recession would cleanse and reset the system and solve the “teacher shortage” real nicely. |
|
Can someone mention if there are similar problems at St. Louis? All I am reading about is St. Mary’s.
Thanks! |
You want fresh grads without education degrees teaching middle school? 40k is too low to get anyone who actually needs the income (i.e. professional teachers), so you get you unqualified aids being promoted |
Where are you finding an excess of great teachers willing to work for peanuts? |
St Louis has different problems, but a better administration and none of the turnover that people are complaining about |
Could you elaborate on the different problems at St. Louis? |
| the combination of a lack of real differentiation and some kids who really struggle academically slows down some classes |
Differentiation from what? |
I agree with this. There is no acknowledgement of the issues or how they are addressing them. The principal did town halls and coffees with younger grades not 6th that was a mess all year or older grades to my knowledge. He avoids issues, when confronted with an issues says it’s the first he’s heard of it. And people are appearing to retire due to age. One AP was demoted and now has left a year later. The other one is leaving now. The resource director 2 years in a row has left. Multiple teachers and long time aides are leaving. It’s due to the admin and pastors not all due to environmental factors (in the general teaching community). Some teachers lefts for other Arlington diocese schools. There is no public sharing of the school wide MAPs scores and I know the most get 80% is not accurate that’s published on the website. I would predict more teachers will continue to leave unless the bishop and admin get involved. |
|
Sadly, I think they’ve resigned themselves to being mediocre. What are parents going to do? Leave for public? There are 5 families waiting in line to take their place.
No real competition or incentives to improve. So they’ll just muddle along, emphasize mass and other religious events, deprioritize academics, and tolerate poor teaching. |
As long as the bulk of students get into Ireton and those who realistically want Gonzaga or Visi get into those schools, they'll be fine. I students start getting totally shut out, then things will change |
| The former AP and the current AP both leaving now is a loss. Neither of them is old, neither of them is retiring, both of them were quite impressive and well-liked by parents. If they are having trouble recruiting and retaining people, it seems like a shame to lose well-respected experienced old hands. I imagine that the current AP may be leaving to take a principal job elsewhere. But if the diocese was on top of this and going for excellence, they would have said, "We have a new principal and a barely-staffed middle school. Can we please give you a stay bonus and some even better title to get you to stay for another year and help us right the ship?" |
|
This is the problem with parochial. While they are better than public schools, they have one thing in common with public, which is a sort of monopoly status. There is one parochial option in each geographic area, and that's pretty much the only option. So they don't really feel the pressure for continuous improvement.
It's a shame, because St. Mary's easily has the opportunity to be the best school around bar none. All the publics and all the privates in NOVA and DC have become insane tampons-in-the-boys-room type places. And behavior problems are increasing and allowed to persist, because there's an unofficial policy not to discipline members of marginalized groups or children of rich parents. St. Mary's is comparatively free of all those problems. All St. Mary's has to do is hustle! They have to say to themselves, we can be the best K-8 school in the state. The very fact of being a sane Catholic school already gives them a huge advantage over the competition. They have an amazing population of families, highly educated, professional, nice, committed. They have great kids. And they do have some great faculty and staff, just not quite enough! Now all they have to do is figure out how to hire, develop, and retain the absolute best quality faculty and staff they can. I don't think the low pay is that big of a problem. It doesn't help, but it's not an excuse for having less impressive teachers. Yes public pays more, but public is a mess these days. If you are called to teaching, you're not usually in it for the money anyway. And if you are a traditional person or a religious person who wants to teach, you will not fit in with most of your colleagues at most publics or privates in NOVA or DC. St. Mary's should have its pick of the kind of teachers it would want to hire anyway. But for some reason they don't love hustling. They don't like criticism, so they won't admit problems. They don't feel a sense of competition because they are the only game in (old) town. And I think that they (justifiably) feel holy because of the good work they do in faith formation, but they rest on the laurels of that a little bit. I suspect that if you asked the administration or the rector about teacher quality, teacher hiring, and teacher retention, they would quickly steer the conversation to their good work in faith formation. And it IS good work, but it's not a relevant answer to the question "why aren't we recruiting, developing, and retaining enough great teachers?" |