European Parliament Elections Going Far Right

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The term “far right” might need to be retired, or at least reserved for people actually on the far end of the political spectrum. For example, Donald Trump is center-right. He’s a New York Republican…not at all a hardliner on social issues. But I guess when 99% of our reporters are leftists, Trump by comparison is way out there.

There are posters on here who say they see no difference between liberals and republicans. So.... yes, many people are so far left they can't see reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dunno why liberals act so shocked. Gee, you mean it is a terrible idea to have open borders for mass migration, invite in a while bunch of poverty that saps billions from taxpayers and social services, and in Europe's case, upends national identity because the people you're flooding your country with have customs and norms that are the antithesis of your own?

Stupid liberals. They think everyone will get along and sing kumbaya songs. No person is illegal, right? Borders shouldn't even exist. Economic opportunities are a fundamental human right, yadda yadda. They've ruined their own countries and are surprised at the backlash. Idiots.

On the other hand, wars and climate change continue to exacerbate the migration of people to more hospitable places. Maybe if the right helped out on ending wars and mitigating climate change, people wouldn't see the need to move.

They can move to China and Russia then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dunno why liberals act so shocked. Gee, you mean it is a terrible idea to have open borders for mass migration, invite in a while bunch of poverty that saps billions from taxpayers and social services, and in Europe's case, upends national identity because the people you're flooding your country with have customs and norms that are the antithesis of your own?

Stupid liberals. They think everyone will get along and sing kumbaya songs. No person is illegal, right? Borders shouldn't even exist. Economic opportunities are a fundamental human right, yadda yadda. They've ruined their own countries and are surprised at the backlash. Idiots.

On the other hand, wars and climate change continue to exacerbate the migration of people to more hospitable places. Maybe if the right helped out on ending wars and mitigating climate change, people wouldn't see the need to move.

Ignoring the fact that many/most of the migrants are not coming from war zones, the wars have almost all been elective wars by the US/NATO. Afghanistan and Syria were two places the US invaded and destabilized the governments. Now Europe gets migrants from there. Libya used to prevent most migrants from crossing the Mediterranean, but the US/NATO knocked off Gaddafi. Then we have Ukraine, where NATO turned a small border skirmish into an opportunity to "weaken" Russia, leading to another couple million migrants. These were all done by liberal regimes.

No one is actually moving because of climate change, its just cover for economic migration that the left gives migrants. You have migrants moving to places like Amsterdam that are literally below sea level.

Enough Europeans have seen through this kind of gas-lighting and they know who is bring the migrants in, and want it to stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dunno why liberals act so shocked. Gee, you mean it is a terrible idea to have open borders for mass migration, invite in a while bunch of poverty that saps billions from taxpayers and social services, and in Europe's case, upends national identity because the people you're flooding your country with have customs and norms that are the antithesis of your own?

Stupid liberals. They think everyone will get along and sing kumbaya songs. No person is illegal, right? Borders shouldn't even exist. Economic opportunities are a fundamental human right, yadda yadda. They've ruined their own countries and are surprised at the backlash. Idiots.

On the other hand, wars and climate change continue to exacerbate the migration of people to more hospitable places. Maybe if the right helped out on ending wars and mitigating climate change, people wouldn't see the need to move.

Ignoring the fact that many/most of the migrants are not coming from war zones, the wars have almost all been elective wars by the US/NATO. Afghanistan and Syria were two places the US invaded and destabilized the governments. Now Europe gets migrants from there. Libya used to prevent most migrants from crossing the Mediterranean, but the US/NATO knocked off Gaddafi. Then we have Ukraine, where NATO turned a small border skirmish into an opportunity to "weaken" Russia, leading to another couple million migrants. These were all done by liberal regimes.

No one is actually moving because of climate change, its just cover for economic migration that the left gives migrants. You have migrants moving to places like Amsterdam that are literally below sea level.

Enough Europeans have seen through this kind of gas-lighting and they know who is bring the migrants in, and want it to stop.

Your recall of these events are really warped, but the bolded is egregious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dunno why liberals act so shocked. Gee, you mean it is a terrible idea to have open borders for mass migration, invite in a while bunch of poverty that saps billions from taxpayers and social services, and in Europe's case, upends national identity because the people you're flooding your country with have customs and norms that are the antithesis of your own?

Stupid liberals. They think everyone will get along and sing kumbaya songs. No person is illegal, right? Borders shouldn't even exist. Economic opportunities are a fundamental human right, yadda yadda. They've ruined their own countries and are surprised at the backlash. Idiots.

On the other hand, wars and climate change continue to exacerbate the migration of people to more hospitable places. Maybe if the right helped out on ending wars and mitigating climate change, people wouldn't see the need to move.

Ignoring the fact that many/most of the migrants are not coming from war zones, the wars have almost all been elective wars by the US/NATO. Afghanistan and Syria were two places the US invaded and destabilized the governments. Now Europe gets migrants from there. Libya used to prevent most migrants from crossing the Mediterranean, but the US/NATO knocked off Gaddafi. Then we have Ukraine, where NATO turned a small border skirmish into an opportunity to "weaken" Russia, leading to another couple million migrants. These were all done by liberal regimes.

No one is actually moving because of climate change, its just cover for economic migration that the left gives migrants. You have migrants moving to places like Amsterdam that are literally below sea level.

Enough Europeans have seen through this kind of gas-lighting and they know who is bring the migrants in, and want it to stop.

Have never heard the war in Ukraine described as a small border skirmish. What do you call WWII? A kerfuffle?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not just Europe. Canada as well......

Conservatives lead by 18 over the Liberals. It’s been 658 straight days that the Conservatives have led the Liberals in Abacus Data polling.
If an election were held today, 42% of committed voters would vote Conservatives with the Liberals at 24%, the NDP at 18% and the Greens at 4%. The BQ is at 34% in Quebec.
Since our last survey, the Conservatives are up 1, the Liberals are unchanged, and the NDP is down 1. Since the beginning of the year, we have seen stability in vote intentions with the Conservatives consistently in the low 40s and the Liberals stuck in the low to mid 20s.

https://abacusdata.ca/conservatives-lead-by-18-evaluations-drop-trudeau-government-abacus-data/

Trudeau is sinking in the polls.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/10/justin-trudeau-election-politics-00134525

This is because Canadian Liberals have gone far off into the deep end.

Yes, Canada now wants to ban use of terms like 'cervix' for health discussions because it might offend trans. Now you have to use the term 'front hole', lol. You cannot make the insanity of liberals up:

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/canadian-cancer-society-sorry-for-using-cervix-instead-of-front-hole-for-lgbtq-community/ar-BB1nLiLY

You are such a liar. The article is about a charity that apologized for words on their trans specific page. I don’t agree with apologizing for the use cervix for what is a cervix, but that’s not “Canada banning the term cervix”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem arises when migrants refuse to assimilate to their host countries. And it's a big problem.

This is the issue right here. Germans and other Europeans don’t want to feel like strangers in their cities and villages. They don’t want people who are hostile toward Western values.

The biggest issue is that when you take on too many foreigners too fast there are problems. It is a small majority of migrants that are criminals but those number rise as the overall numbers of migrants rise. These criminals ruin it for other migrants who are then discriminated against by locals.

Amd the crazy thing is the migrants want these bad apples deported asap but liberal primarily white politicians decide that that police shouldn’t talk to immigration.

My parents are immigrants from a developing a country . I have absolutely no desire to live there because I like living in a place where you don’t have to bribe workers to do their job, where you can’t pay off judges, where there are environmental regulations, where there aren’t constant scams, and most people don’t litter.

Our family is super pro deport everyone who breaks the laws. It’s a privilege to be here as an asylum seeker or green card holder. You break the law you should get tossed out.

Look at what is happening in NYC. So many Venezuelans that now people there can’t stand them. Why? Because too many young men who are breaking the law. Using electric bikes to steal, brazenly shoplift, assaulting and shooting cops. The vast majority of Venezuelans aren’t like that and don’t want them around. But NYC won’t tell immigration when they arrest them. It benefits the rest of the migrants to toss all these punks out of the country.

+100 to both PPs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not just Europe. Canada as well......

Conservatives lead by 18 over the Liberals. It’s been 658 straight days that the Conservatives have led the Liberals in Abacus Data polling.
If an election were held today, 42% of committed voters would vote Conservatives with the Liberals at 24%, the NDP at 18% and the Greens at 4%. The BQ is at 34% in Quebec.
Since our last survey, the Conservatives are up 1, the Liberals are unchanged, and the NDP is down 1. Since the beginning of the year, we have seen stability in vote intentions with the Conservatives consistently in the low 40s and the Liberals stuck in the low to mid 20s.

https://abacusdata.ca/conservatives-lead-by-18-evaluations-drop-trudeau-government-abacus-data/

Trudeau is sinking in the polls.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/10/justin-trudeau-election-politics-00134525

This is because Canadian Liberals have gone far off into the deep end.

Yes, Canada now wants to ban use of terms like 'cervix' for health discussions because it might offend trans. Now you have to use the term 'front hole', lol. You cannot make the insanity of liberals up:

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/canadian-cancer-society-sorry-for-using-cervix-instead-of-front-hole-for-lgbtq-community/ar-BB1nLiLY

You are such a liar. The article is about a charity that apologized for words on their trans specific page. I don’t agree with apologizing for the use cervix for what is a cervix, but that’s not “Canada banning the term cervix”.

DP. It’s still utterly ridiculous and dystopian.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sweden has gone from Abba to Alla in two generations.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13501783/How-Sweden-haven-mafia-gangs.html

Swedens population is now 15% non western European and it is causing havoc and chaos to what was a peaceful country. Historically had a Sweden has 2% non western European population.

+1
It is appalling what Sweden and Germany have allowed their countries to become.

[Anonymous]

I’m a cynic and I think that if the powers that be wanted immigration to be tighter, they would do it (taking about US). The question is then why would they not want immigration curbed? And the answer to why does a politician do X usually comes down to money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Non westerners are recruited in Montenegro to go to Sweden specifically because Sweden is soft on crime.

The non westerners in Sweden are part of the welfare state but have not assimilated into Swedish culture.

And the non-westerners in France have created their own African enclave in Paris. I have to wonder why counties like France, Sweden, Germany, etc. are so stupid regarding immigration. It comes as no surprise to me that voters are fighting back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I dunno why liberals act so shocked. Gee, you mean it is a terrible idea to have open borders for mass migration, invite in a while bunch of poverty that saps billions from taxpayers and social services, and in Europe's case, upends national identity because the people you're flooding your country with have customs and norms that are the antithesis of your own?

Stupid liberals. They think everyone will get along and sing kumbaya songs. No person is illegal, right? Borders shouldn't even exist. Economic opportunities are a fundamental human right, yadda yadda. They've ruined their own countries and are surprised at the backlash. Idiots.

Exactly this. What did they think was going to happen? Glad to see people are finally waking up and taking action to vote out those who have allowed this madness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dunno why liberals act so shocked. Gee, you mean it is a terrible idea to have open borders for mass migration, invite in a while bunch of poverty that saps billions from taxpayers and social services, and in Europe's case, upends national identity because the people you're flooding your country with have customs and norms that are the antithesis of your own?

Stupid liberals. They think everyone will get along and sing kumbaya songs. No person is illegal, right? Borders shouldn't even exist. Economic opportunities are a fundamental human right, yadda yadda. They've ruined their own countries and are surprised at the backlash. Idiots.

On the other hand, wars and climate change continue to exacerbate the migration of people to more hospitable places. Maybe if the right helped out on ending wars and mitigating climate change, people wouldn't see the need to move.

Oh, spare us all. It’s not “the right” who has gotten us into wars in the last few years. Take responsibility for your own party’s idiocy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not just Europe. Canada as well......

Conservatives lead by 18 over the Liberals. It’s been 658 straight days that the Conservatives have led the Liberals in Abacus Data polling.
If an election were held today, 42% of committed voters would vote Conservatives with the Liberals at 24%, the NDP at 18% and the Greens at 4%. The BQ is at 34% in Quebec.
Since our last survey, the Conservatives are up 1, the Liberals are unchanged, and the NDP is down 1. Since the beginning of the year, we have seen stability in vote intentions with the Conservatives consistently in the low 40s and the Liberals stuck in the low to mid 20s.

https://abacusdata.ca/conservatives-lead-by-18-evaluations-drop-trudeau-government-abacus-data/

Trudeau is sinking in the polls.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/10/justin-trudeau-election-politics-00134525

This is because Canadian Liberals have gone far off into the deep end.

Yes, Canada now wants to ban use of terms like 'cervix' for health discussions because it might offend trans. Now you have to use the term 'front hole', lol. You cannot make the insanity of liberals up:

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/canadian-cancer-society-sorry-for-using-cervix-instead-of-front-hole-for-lgbtq-community/ar-BB1nLiLY

You are such a liar. The article is about a charity that apologized for words on their trans specific page. I don’t agree with apologizing for the use cervix for what is a cervix, but that’s not “Canada banning the term cervix”.

DP. It’s still utterly ridiculous and dystopian.

I think it’s fairly clear that PP was talking about societal pressure in Canada impacting public opinion, not actual government legislation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The term “far right” might need to be retired, or at least reserved for people actually on the far end of the political spectrum. For example, Donald Trump is center-right. He’s a New York Republican…not at all a hardliner on social issues. But I guess when 99% of our reporters are leftists, Trump by comparison is way out there.

Agree 100%. Wanting to protect your country’s borders is not “far right.” Liberals do this all the time. They use hyperbole which winds up making them look like caricatures. Calling people “racists” simply because they don’t want masses of illegal immigrants is another example. The left has really lost the plot and people all over the world are finally waking up to that reality.