Except the data says othewise. SAT's matter. There is a direct correlation to academic performance. I get that low scoring well-meaning students think they can muscle through rigorous coursework, but the data says those who perform on the SAT can do it better. Don't fight the facts. |
retaking the test over and over (people usually only do 1 or 2) doesn't give you *that* big of a bump. Regardless, some of the top colleges are finding that SAT scores in conjunction with grades are a better predictor of success in college than just grades (inflated more often than not) alone. |
Mmmmk, but you know it dropped in the latest rankings right? |
BC's new competition is BU, it's next-door which neighbor has climbed big time in the last 10 years. |
I disagree. I know of wealthy UMC 'straight A/A-' students in excellent schools who after multiple tries, and after a lot of prep and coaching simply cannot crack 34/1500. |
The BC boosters on this thread are hilarious. They are almost as bad as Northeastern boosters. We are elite!!! |
BC's problem is it completes with other Boston/NE schools. My extended family used to be a BC family. Then we succeeded a little and became a Harvard family for a couple of generations. Now things are getting more competitive and we're increasingly becoming a LAC family.
ND families are more likely to stay ND families. |
One of the reasons ND has such a huge endowment. Oh by the way... ND Endowment $16.6 billion BC Endowment $3.4 billion |
BC competes with Tufts, BU and NEU in Boston. I don't think many people consider it a competitor with Notre Dame. |
I know two BC grads who sent all their kids to NEU... |
Queue the NEU boosters…3-2-1 |
I thought it was insane, but it happens. BC has limited loyalty among its alumni. |
1590 - went to UMD. Rejected from MIT. |
Great school. In state tuition I imagine. UMD is not a backup school. UMD, UNC, UVA, even Michigan are all great publics. |
Just stop. You hate NEU, we get it. You don't need to pollute every thread with your invective. |