
Salon?? Oh, wow. I guess you thought this was a real news source? ![]() ![]() LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources. Overall, we rate Salon Left Biased based on story selection that strongly favors the left and endorsements of political positions affiliated with the Democratic Party. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to occasionally utilizing sources poor sources and failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT Factual Reporting: MIXED Country: USA Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History Founded in 1995, Salon is a progressive/liberal news and opinion website created by David Talbot. Salon publishes articles on U.S. politics, culture, and current events and has a left-leaning editorial stance. The current editor is Andrew OāHehir. Read our profile on the United States government and media. Funded by / Ownership Salon is owned by the Salon Media Group and is funded through periodic cash infusions from John Warnock and William Hambrecht. Revenue is generated through online advertising and subscription fees for exclusive content and sales from the marketplace. Analysis / Bias In review, Salon focuses on U.S. politics and current affairs. Story selection almost always favors the left, and there is the frequent use of loaded emotional language such as this: What campus free speech? Arizona case shows how far the right will go to stifle dissent. Like most on Salon, this story is properly sourced to credible media such as the New York Times and the Arizona Republic and occasionally uses sources that have failed fact checks such as The Guardian and Wikileaks. Salon also publishes health and science news that is scientifically based. Editorially, Salon utilizes strong wording that is anti-right in a tone such as this: Donald Trump is running for president as a flat-out racist. Further, they do not clearly label opinion pieces which can be misleading. It was revealed by numerous media outlets, including the left-leaning CNN, that Salon waited one year to correct a fact related to Ron DeSantis. See failed fact check below. Failed Fact Checks āLooks like Sheriff David Clarkeās āarmyā medals might be B.S.ā ā False Gov. Ron DeSantis ājust signed legislation requiring students, faculty, and staff at Floridaās public universities and colleges to register their political views with the state.ā ā False Overall, we rate Salon Left Biased based on story selection that strongly favors the left and endorsements of political positions affiliated with the Democratic Party. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to occasionally utilizing poor sources and failed fact checks. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/salon/ |
You could have just read Trump tweets and MAGA message boards if you really wanted to delve into the vile. |
I stopped reading after the bolded. He's not in any way, "my guy." But you're doing a great job going low with him. |
No thanks. DCUM more than suffices. |
The Celebrity Apprentice guy was really detailed, and I donāt hear any denials from anybody. Iād be curious if the guy he appoints to wipe him up between meetings will be considered an officer. Could be a scenario where two worlds collide. |
Good. |
There's no end to the random Joe Schmoe Republicans out in the hinterlands of Iowa or wherever who's never even met the man, and who gets his only info about Trump from ass-kissing MAGA pundits who are dyed-in-the-wool Trump cultists - who then are absolutely CONVINCED that they know so much more about Trump than even the people who actually know and worked with Trump on a daily basis.
They are likewise CONVINCED that it's all made-up liberal BS when in fact the sources end up turning out to be his own staffers, his own advisors, his own campaign, the people who worked with him on the Apprentice or other ventures, and so on. Just as how they think the indictments and trials Trump is facing are somehow all orchestrated by unhinged LWNJs when the people testifying against him are Republicans and HIS OWN people - NOT "LWNJs." |
+1 That guy has been flagrantly violating his NDA for years and Trump has never sued him. And Trump made Keith Schiller director of Oval Office operations. |
I donāt have an issue with adult incontience or adult diapers ā I pretty much assume everyone over age 60 is dealing with this to some extent.
But this goes beyond that and is part of a larger picture indicating someone who has some pretty serious mental issues and lack of self-insight. Like the ketchup throwing, the fact that he will only use new ketchup bottles, many of the other little stories. This guy is not normal in a lot of little ways that add up to a very disturbing picture. Itās really troublesome that so many people arenāt bothered by this. |
Is all of this REALLY true about Trumpās BO? |
Of course not, it is just another "Steele dossier". |
Yes |
+1 Just more "pee pee tapes" garbage from the left. |
But⦠but⦠bias or something. Just kidding. I think weāve all known someone sort of like Donald and he smells terrible. I say again though, thatās not the worst thing about him or his traitorous party. The worst thing about him is his treachery. |
This thread? Yes. Itās certainly not the greatest concern though. He stole above top secret documents and moved them around to keep them away from the people sent to collect them. Some documents are still missing, probably sold to the highest bidder. Oh, and he staged a coup. Heās the GOP front runner. ![]() |