NVA seeking ecnl coaches

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really wasn't any point in trying to drag FCV into this. Not sure why anybody wants to make the comparison other than that they always get slung into the convo when talking about soccer in loudoun county.

Who else is complaining about Loudoun soccer getting field space?

I'm unsure. Who?

Loudon having success, field space, and resources is not good for FCV or VDA.

What new success is Loudoun having?

New name. Added more clubs. Imagine being the biggest club in the state and still feeling the need to add more clubs.

I guess that’s success?

Loudoun dad… what’s the “success”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really wasn't any point in trying to drag FCV into this. Not sure why anybody wants to make the comparison other than that they always get slung into the convo when talking about soccer in loudoun county.

Who else is complaining about Loudoun soccer getting field space?

I'm unsure. Who?

Loudon having success, field space, and resources is not good for FCV or VDA.

What new success is Loudoun having?

New name. Added more clubs. Imagine being the biggest club in the state and still feeling the need to add more clubs.

I guess that’s success?

"Winning off the field"

Loudoun dad… what’s the “success”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really wasn't any point in trying to drag FCV into this. Not sure why anybody wants to make the comparison other than that they always get slung into the convo when talking about soccer in loudoun county.

Who else is complaining about Loudoun soccer getting field space?

I'm unsure. Who?

Loudon having success, field space, and resources is not good for FCV or VDA.

What new success is Loudoun having?

New name. Added more clubs. Imagine being the biggest club in the state and still feeling the need to add more clubs.

I guess that’s success?

Loudoun dad… what’s the “success”?

Who says they’re having success? They’re posting on a website for coaches…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really wasn't any point in trying to drag FCV into this. Not sure why anybody wants to make the comparison other than that they always get slung into the convo when talking about soccer in loudoun county.

Who else is complaining about Loudoun soccer getting field space?

I'm unsure. Who?

Loudon having success, field space, and resources is not good for FCV or VDA.

What new success is Loudoun having?

New name. Added more clubs. Imagine being the biggest club in the state and still feeling the need to add more clubs.

I guess that’s success?

Loudoun dad… what’s the “success”?

Who says they’re having success? They’re posting on a website for coaches…

Loudoun dad said FCV and VDA should be worried about Loudoun’s fields, resources, and success.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t add clubs, they partnered with them. And at least one is dealing with internal pressure to pull out.

Would that be Valor or Great Falls? From what I understand, both clubs were excited to be a part of that "partnership" (although one wonders how the two smaller clubs benefit from that agreement).

very few Valor or GFR players made it to the NVa ECNL rosters
practices are farther away for these players
very few of these ECNL players are going on to significant post high school playing (this is the primary selling point for the ECNL clubs, that your kid needs to be on a ECNL or MLS Next club to get 'there')
some of the NVA teams just are not significantly better despite more training

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t add clubs, they partnered with them. And at least one is dealing with internal pressure to pull out.

Would that be Valor or Great Falls? From what I understand, both clubs were excited to be a part of that "partnership" (although one wonders how the two smaller clubs benefit from that agreement).

very few Valor or GFR players made it to the NVa ECNL rosters
practices are farther away for these players
very few of these ECNL players are going on to significant post high school playing (this is the primary selling point for the ECNL clubs, that your kid needs to be on a ECNL or MLS Next club to get 'there')
some of the NVA teams just are not significantly better despite more training

Well thats because most valor and GFR kids were not significantly better than current rosters. This is more a long term strategy to get kids in earlier to develop. They simply would not going to cut loudoun players make room with players who were about the same. That being said they are on par with all the Virginia ECNL teams. ECNL has now become diluted talent wise as clubs chased the ECNL status.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t add clubs, they partnered with them. And at least one is dealing with internal pressure to pull out.

Would that be Valor or Great Falls? From what I understand, both clubs were excited to be a part of that "partnership" (although one wonders how the two smaller clubs benefit from that agreement).

very few Valor or GFR players made it to the NVa ECNL rosters
practices are farther away for these players
very few of these ECNL players are going on to significant post high school playing (this is the primary selling point for the ECNL clubs, that your kid needs to be on a ECNL or MLS Next club to get 'there')
some of the NVA teams just are not significantly better despite more training

Well thats because most valor and GFR kids were not significantly better than current rosters. This is more a long term strategy to get kids in earlier to develop. They simply would not going to cut loudoun players make room with players who were about the same. That being said they are on par with all the Virginia ECNL teams. ECNL has now become diluted talent wise as clubs chased the ECNL status.

No that’s because the Loudoun coaches still control and were not going to cut ‘their’ kids.

The NVA ecnl teams have lost to their ‘feeder teams’ in head to head so fool yourself if you feel better but the score don’t lie.

[Anonymous]

Where does NVA practice?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where does NVA practice?

I'd imagine where Loudoun practices?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t add clubs, they partnered with them. And at least one is dealing with internal pressure to pull out.

Would that be Valor or Great Falls? From what I understand, both clubs were excited to be a part of that "partnership" (although one wonders how the two smaller clubs benefit from that agreement).

very few Valor or GFR players made it to the NVa ECNL rosters
practices are farther away for these players
very few of these ECNL players are going on to significant post high school playing (this is the primary selling point for the ECNL clubs, that your kid needs to be on a ECNL or MLS Next club to get 'there')
some of the NVA teams just are not significantly better despite more training

Well thats because most valor and GFR kids were not significantly better than current rosters. This is more a long term strategy to get kids in earlier to develop. They simply would not going to cut loudoun players make room with players who were about the same. That being said they are on par with all the Virginia ECNL teams. ECNL has now become diluted talent wise as clubs chased the ECNL status.

No that’s because the Loudoun coaches still control and were not going to cut ‘their’ kids.

The NVA ecnl teams have lost to their ‘feeder teams’ in head to head so fool yourself if you feel better but the score don’t lie.

This is just untrue on the girls side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t add clubs, they partnered with them. And at least one is dealing with internal pressure to pull out.

Would that be Valor or Great Falls? From what I understand, both clubs were excited to be a part of that "partnership" (although one wonders how the two smaller clubs benefit from that agreement).

very few Valor or GFR players made it to the NVa ECNL rosters
practices are farther away for these players
very few of these ECNL players are going on to significant post high school playing (this is the primary selling point for the ECNL clubs, that your kid needs to be on a ECNL or MLS Next club to get 'there')
some of the NVA teams just are not significantly better despite more training

Well thats because most valor and GFR kids were not significantly better than current rosters. This is more a long term strategy to get kids in earlier to develop. They simply would not going to cut loudoun players make room with players who were about the same. That being said they are on par with all the Virginia ECNL teams. ECNL has now become diluted talent wise as clubs chased the ECNL status.

No that’s because the Loudoun coaches still control and were not going to cut ‘their’ kids.

The NVA ecnl teams have lost to their ‘feeder teams’ in head to head so fool yourself if you feel better but the score don’t lie.

One of their coaches spends more time on other ECNL club sidelines than his own. Pitiful that NVA can’t develop a single player.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t add clubs, they partnered with them. And at least one is dealing with internal pressure to pull out.

Would that be Valor or Great Falls? From what I understand, both clubs were excited to be a part of that "partnership" (although one wonders how the two smaller clubs benefit from that agreement).

Not a single dang player. Not one.
very few Valor or GFR players made it to the NVa ECNL rosters
practices are farther away for these players
very few of these ECNL players are going on to significant post high school playing (this is the primary selling point for the ECNL clubs, that your kid needs to be on a ECNL or MLS Next club to get 'there')
some of the NVA teams just are not significantly better despite more training

Well thats because most valor and GFR kids were not significantly better than current rosters. This is more a long term strategy to get kids in earlier to develop. They simply would not going to cut loudoun players make room with players who were about the same. That being said they are on par with all the Virginia ECNL teams. ECNL has now become diluted talent wise as clubs chased the ECNL status.

No that’s because the Loudoun coaches still control and were not going to cut ‘their’ kids.

The NVA ecnl teams have lost to their ‘feeder teams’ in head to head so fool yourself if you feel better but the score don’t lie.

One of their coaches spends more time on other ECNL club sidelines than his own. Pitiful that NVA can’t develop a single player.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t add clubs, they partnered with them. And at least one is dealing with internal pressure to pull out.

Would that be Valor or Great Falls? From what I understand, both clubs were excited to be a part of that "partnership" (although one wonders how the two smaller clubs benefit from that agreement).

very few Valor or GFR players made it to the NVa ECNL rosters
practices are farther away for these players
very few of these ECNL players are going on to significant post high school playing (this is the primary selling point for the ECNL clubs, that your kid needs to be on a ECNL or MLS Next club to get 'there')
some of the NVA teams just are not significantly better despite more training

Well thats because most valor and GFR kids were not significantly better than current rosters. This is more a long term strategy to get kids in earlier to develop. They simply would not going to cut loudoun players make room with players who were about the same. That being said they are on par with all the Virginia ECNL teams. ECNL has now become diluted talent wise as clubs chased the ECNL status.

No that’s because the Loudoun coaches still control and were not going to cut ‘their’ kids.

The NVA ecnl teams have lost to their ‘feeder teams’ in head to head so fool yourself if you feel better but the score don’t lie.

One of their coaches spends more time on other ECNL club sidelines than his own. Pitiful that NVA can’t develop a single player.

Not a single player! None! Zero!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where does NVA practice?

I'd imagine where Loudoun practices?

Ouch

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t add clubs, they partnered with them. And at least one is dealing with internal pressure to pull out.

Would that be Valor or Great Falls? From what I understand, both clubs were excited to be a part of that "partnership" (although one wonders how the two smaller clubs benefit from that agreement).

very few Valor or GFR players made it to the NVa ECNL rosters
practices are farther away for these players
very few of these ECNL players are going on to significant post high school playing (this is the primary selling point for the ECNL clubs, that your kid needs to be on a ECNL or MLS Next club to get 'there')
some of the NVA teams just are not significantly better despite more training

Well thats because most valor and GFR kids were not significantly better than current rosters. This is more a long term strategy to get kids in earlier to develop. They simply would not going to cut loudoun players make room with players who were about the same. That being said they are on par with all the Virginia ECNL teams. ECNL has now become diluted talent wise as clubs chased the ECNL status.

No that’s because the Loudoun coaches still control and were not going to cut ‘their’ kids.

The NVA ecnl teams have lost to their ‘feeder teams’ in head to head so fool yourself if you feel better but the score don’t lie.

This is just untrue on the girls side.

Loudoun coaches control
Practices are in Loudoun - not rotated as originally proposed
NVA G has lost to lower league teams:
Vienna RL 08G 5 - 0 NVA 08G