How is that a safety issue? |
|
Many area public schools with open campus are actually happy not to have to assume responsibility for 2000 plus students at lunch in a cramped cafeteria (even if spread out over a few lunch periods).
DC area students have safely enjoyed open campus privileges for 50 years. If anything, more public schools should embrace open campus lunch. |
How short the skirts are is far worse than a lot of the public school clothing. |
Many kids cannot afford that. |
But many can. They’re ordering UberEats and DoorDash to school now, where there are closed lunches. And the schools that have open lunches, the kids are going to those restaurants and shops and buying. Bring those shops to the school instead of having the kids go to them. |
It’s far easier to maintain a successful six decade run of open campus. Even DCPS has open campus. No large constituency is calling for an end to open campus. Regarding the above idea to bring trendy food options to a closed campus school, no district is going to team up with local fast food. Why waste the effort for limited return. There are likely legal issues involved as well, unless the district actually partners with a specific brand or vendor for a specific reason. Both public schools and the students benefit from open campus which is why it’s not going away any time soon. |
Maybe in your world but I don’t know any kids doing that and mine are not. That would be terrible when not all kids can afford it. |
You don't have to reduce "equity" ad absurdum. |
What are criteria are you using to claim the existing open campus policy is "successful"? Again, as an MCPS student in the 90s, the issues people complain about with open campus lunches today are the same ones we had back in the day: 1) Kids leaving school for lunch and not returning for the rest of the school day 2) Fights/drugs off-campus (used to be far more concerned about cigarette smoking back then versus weed) 3) Theft and disorderly conduct in shops and restaurants The question is: How much of these inevitable and unavoidable negative tradeoffs is the school and the surrounding community willing to accept in exchange for the economic activity or the perceived satisfaction of the parents or students who think open lunch is a positive experience? You apparently believe there's no floor. The store and restaurant owners disagree with you and many parents, who do not want their kids to be harmed as unsupervised and unruly teens target, bully or introduce their kids to high-risk behaviors, support a closed campus over an open campus. It seems the volume of these kids of incidents has increased to extent that many schools have done the cost-benefit analysis and decided it's not worth it. That is just my gut feeling. It would be good if MCPS was transparent though and released that kind of data and set official guidelines that would be consistent so that students and parents understand at what level of incident reports open lunch is no longer an option for that school. |
Seneca Valley, which is not urban, used to have official open lunch, until a 15-year-old student was hit and killed while walking to school. I don't know if Northwest ever had official open lunch, but that non-urban high school is also within walking distance of fast food. |
This is the most ridiculous logic I've seen. Your head is in the sand if you don't know kids ordering food to school. My kids go to a Title I high school and MCPS where an overwhelming majority of the kids qualify for FARMS. And yet, UberEats and DoorDash pull up REGULARLY. Many MCPS principals have complained about this problem and the disruptions it causes. https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/montgomery-county-school-cracks-down-on-students-ordering-lunch-to-campus/138179/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/students-bored-by-cafeteria-fare-love-food-delivery-services-schools-dont/2019/06/07/2568d12c-8617-11e9-98c1-e945ae5db8fb_story.html The idea of MCPS partnering with the vendors to bring those foods to school is actually a suggestion from other educators and it makes sense: We have vending machines that bring popular snacks and drinks to kids for purchase. Why not these other meals? |
ha! love this. |
That is not true. Many businesses are fed up with the disruption and chaos of high school students and are CLOSING their doors to teens during lunch time or enacting enhanced security measures because of the disruption they cause: https://www.wjpitch.com/the-catch-online/2023/03/30/chipotle-closes-its-doors-to-students/ https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/maryland/16-year-olds-arrested-charged-robbing-juvenile-mcdonalds-silver-spring/65-5685d1fe-5469-44e9-8a59-dc69cf64ae15 https://wjla.com/news/local/quince-orchard-high-school-changes-lunch-policy-montgomery-county-narcan-high-school-student-found-unconscious-mcdonalds-bathroom-possible-overdose-gaithersburg-opioid-fentanyl-mcpd-police-maryland-drugs-crime-dmv-mcps https://thermtide.com/19169/popular/rms-open-lunch-policy-should-stay-despite-concerns/
|
They are wearing shorts underneath. Tons of public school kids wear sports shorts and CB booty shorts |
|
I am still shocked Wawa is opening up in front of Gaithersburg high school.
That will be a train wreck. Waited decades for a Wawa and it will be ruined in a month. |