They're a non-profit. They don't pay taxes. |
| Keep those poor kids out of my kid's class! |
CB has huge sway over the futures of college bound kids. Because if test optional, they are focusing more on AP exams and convincing pols to pay them for more student tests, rather than have parents make the decision. Issues like pass rates for these new test takers, test administration and scoring transparency should be out in the open. CB execs get millions in salary, and nobody asks whether they are doing a good job. |
I agree with you there, but that's not really "accountability". College Board also owns SAT, btw. |
I guess it is at least scoring transparency? There are definitely other measures of accountability for use of taxpayer funds for AP tests including how they help under resourced schools teach the material and administer the tests as well as whether the juice is worth the squeeze in terms of actually making a difference to the new kids who otherwise would have not have taken the test (pass rates, college credits received, etc.) |
You are completely unrealistic about what happens in classrooms. The teacher is not going to let the unprepared kids fail; the class will inevitably have to move slower. - AP teacher |
The nonprofit can invest the money in hidden activities that benefit corrupt insiders. |
| All I can say is that our AP coordinator is overwhelmed with the number of tests to manage under the current system. If free tests generate a lot more takers, it will not be pretty. |
Why are you refusing to do your job? |
You can inflate grades without slowing down the class. If the teacher can "not let" unprepared kids fail the test, then why would prepared kids fail the test? |
+1 I don’t understand when teachers or parents claim that allowing anyone to take advanced classes results in the class being slowed down. My child has taken 3 AP classes with kids that he claims clearly didn’t belong in the class. The teacher got through all of the material and additional content after the exams. The teachers were accessible for extra help during specific days during the last half of lunch. Apparently most kids don’t take advantage of these opportunities. The kids that didn’t belong got C’s and D’s (I assume this is grade inflation. According to my son most didn’t bother to take the exams or earned 1s and 2s. So why are some teachers slowing down the class? How are they penalized or forced to slow down? Do teachers have to demonstrate that a certain percentage of students pass the class? |
We’re not unrealistic about what happens in some classes. What we’re saying is there is no reason to slow down a class unless the greater majority of the class is not prepared. This doesn’t mean “letting” the unprepared kids fail. Set expectations clearly set up front, document them, provide the necessary supports and resources for students. Just like students are coached to choose challenging courses, they can be coached to put in the necessary effort to pass. Additionally, what needs to be looked at is if kids have been provided the supports early on to ensure they are prepared for challenging courses. That could be summer programs, tutoring, etc. |
When those students are minorities, you'd better believe the teacher is instructed to slow down the class if that's what is required for students to pass. Lots of reteaching, retakes, offering personal time (before/after, lunch breaks) is expected. I only wish the student's grade in the class was heavily based on their test score. But since students aren't required to take the test, that won't happen. |
Is it true that students are not required to take AP tests? I don't understand how it's okay to get the GPA boost from taking an AP, but not be required to take the test. |
This has been the case for eons. I've been out of HS for 35 years. I took two AP classes (HS only offered 3, and the AP calc class was at 7am which I wasn't going to do), but I only took one AP exam because that's all I could afford. |