married by 30

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It strikes the right balance. You get to enjoy college, grad school, couple years of work and citu living and going out a lot and getting some work / life / relationship experience in your 20s. Meet someone in your late 20s, get married at 30, have a few yrs to travel and enjoy before kids by/around 35 so you aren't that old at the start and duration of the parenting journey. Hope grandparents are retired so have time to help but not too old to be able to do so.

I am 40 and most of my friends got married between 30-33. Those were the peak years of weddings for us. We are lawyers and all our friends are professionals, most went to grad schools, live in major cities etc.

Honestly from friends who are single longer, it gets a lot less fun. In your 20s being single is the norm and you meet a ton of ppl and it's easy to date.


35 is too old for the woman as it's advance maternal age, the guy can wait but the woman can't, 30 is the latest for woman to start according to science


Wealthy women can afford IVF, adoption & surrogacy.


Maybe adoption but if you are looking to have your own kids start by 30 for the woman, it's not a debate it's facts and science


It isn’t. Most women can conceive well into their 30s & early 40s. Many fertility issues are due to the male factor, and would’ve begin present regardless of when the couple started TTC.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women looks and womb go south and fall apart after 30


Men age much worse because they lose their hair (which looks horrible and sometimes even grotesque) and do no skincare. I will definitely encourage my boys to marry in their 20s well before their hairline starts going.


Mans sperm work past 50 woman's womb not past 34


Funny, every woman I know had kids after 36. And we are middle class so it’s unlikely IVF was involved.


Everyone in my social circle who wanted a kid between 35 and 40 did. It seems like after 40 is really where things get iffy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women looks and womb go south and fall apart after 30


Let me tell you something that’s going to blow your mind: not all of us live everyday of our lives in pursuit of pleasing men.


You can't de-age your womb


I don’t care about my “womb.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Women looks and womb go south and fall apart after 30


Two words. J Lo.
Anonymous
More and more people are delaying having children until their late 30s or 40s. But as you age, so do your ovaries and the eggs inside them. You cannot see or feel these changes, and they happen faster than you may think.

A woman's peak reproductive years are between the late teens and late 20s. By age 30, fertility (the ability to get pregnant) starts to decline. This decline happens faster once you reach your mid-30s.

Please look at this, nothing will de-age a womb

https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/having-a-baby-after-age-35-how-aging-affects-fertility-and-pregnancy#:~:text=By%20age%2030%2C%20fertility%20(the,getting%20pregnant%20naturally%20is%20unlikely.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women looks and womb go south and fall apart after 30


Two words. J Lo.


One out of 3.9 billion women, you have very low odds
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women looks and womb go south and fall apart after 30


Let me tell you something that’s going to blow your mind: not all of us live everyday of our lives in pursuit of pleasing men.


You can't de-age your womb


You can do IVF.

And, you can’t fathom that not every woman wants babies.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women looks and womb go south and fall apart after 30


Two words. J Lo.


Have you seen her face un-retouched? Look her up on Getty images. She’s actually sort of a mess. I’m not the MRA poster spewing garbage in this thread but she gets way too much credit that rightfully belongs to photo shop.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Op, why post with something you've made up?


Did you never hear of it?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It strikes the right balance. You get to enjoy college, grad school, couple years of work and citu living and going out a lot and getting some work / life / relationship experience in your 20s. Meet someone in your late 20s, get married at 30, have a few yrs to travel and enjoy before kids by/around 35 so you aren't that old at the start and duration of the parenting journey. Hope grandparents are retired so have time to help but not too old to be able to do so.

I am 40 and most of my friends got married between 30-33. Those were the peak years of weddings for us. We are lawyers and all our friends are professionals, most went to grad schools, live in major cities etc.

Honestly from friends who are single longer, it gets a lot less fun. In your 20s being single is the norm and you meet a ton of ppl and it's easy to date.


35 is too old for the woman as it's advance maternal age, the guy can wait but the woman can't, 30 is the latest for woman to start according to science


Wealthy women can afford IVF, adoption & surrogacy.


Maybe adoption but if you are looking to have your own kids start by 30 for the woman, it's not a debate it's facts and science


It isn’t. Most women can conceive well into their 30s & early 40s. Many fertility issues are due to the male factor, and would’ve begin present regardless of when the couple started TTC.


Incorrect male fertility occurs after age 50

Although a man's fertility can theoretically last until death, sperm production has been found to decline from around the age of 50. Although it is still possible to conceive a child, and many men do have children in their 50s or later, it may take longer for you and your partner to become pregnant.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:More and more people are delaying having children until their late 30s or 40s. But as you age, so do your ovaries and the eggs inside them. You cannot see or feel these changes, and they happen faster than you may think.

A woman's peak reproductive years are between the late teens and late 20s. By age 30, fertility (the ability to get pregnant) starts to decline. This decline happens faster once you reach your mid-30s.

Please look at this, nothing will de-age a womb

https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/having-a-baby-after-age-35-how-aging-affects-fertility-and-pregnancy#:~:text=By%20age%2030%2C%20fertility%20(the,getting%20pregnant%20naturally%20is%20unlikely.


Why do you assume I care about getting pregnant?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:More and more people are delaying having children until their late 30s or 40s. But as you age, so do your ovaries and the eggs inside them. You cannot see or feel these changes, and they happen faster than you may think.

A woman's peak reproductive years are between the late teens and late 20s. By age 30, fertility (the ability to get pregnant) starts to decline. This decline happens faster once you reach your mid-30s.

Please look at this, nothing will de-age a womb

https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/having-a-baby-after-age-35-how-aging-affects-fertility-and-pregnancy#:~:text=By%20age%2030%2C%20fertility%20(the,getting%20pregnant%20naturally%20is%20unlikely.


That doesn’t say what you think it says. Women in their 30s are highly likely to get pregnant.
Anonymous
Well, not necessary to have biological kids or kids at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:More and more people are delaying having children until their late 30s or 40s. But as you age, so do your ovaries and the eggs inside them. You cannot see or feel these changes, and they happen faster than you may think.

A woman's peak reproductive years are between the late teens and late 20s. By age 30, fertility (the ability to get pregnant) starts to decline. This decline happens faster once you reach your mid-30s.

Please look at this, nothing will de-age a womb

https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/having-a-baby-after-age-35-how-aging-affects-fertility-and-pregnancy#:~:text=By%20age%2030%2C%20fertility%20(the,getting%20pregnant%20naturally%20is%20unlikely.


You act like that is a bad thing. You also use “children” in the plural. Most families we know have one kid. A couple have two.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Well, not necessary to have biological kids or kids at all.


+1
post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: