It isn’t. Most women can conceive well into their 30s & early 40s. Many fertility issues are due to the male factor, and would’ve begin present regardless of when the couple started TTC. |
Everyone in my social circle who wanted a kid between 35 and 40 did. It seems like after 40 is really where things get iffy. |
I don’t care about my “womb.” |
Two words. J Lo. |
|
More and more people are delaying having children until their late 30s or 40s. But as you age, so do your ovaries and the eggs inside them. You cannot see or feel these changes, and they happen faster than you may think.
A woman's peak reproductive years are between the late teens and late 20s. By age 30, fertility (the ability to get pregnant) starts to decline. This decline happens faster once you reach your mid-30s. Please look at this, nothing will de-age a womb https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/having-a-baby-after-age-35-how-aging-affects-fertility-and-pregnancy#:~:text=By%20age%2030%2C%20fertility%20(the,getting%20pregnant%20naturally%20is%20unlikely. |
One out of 3.9 billion women, you have very low odds |
|
Have you seen her face un-retouched? Look her up on Getty images. She’s actually sort of a mess. I’m not the MRA poster spewing garbage in this thread but she gets way too much credit that rightfully belongs to photo shop. |
Did you never hear of it? |
Incorrect male fertility occurs after age 50 Although a man's fertility can theoretically last until death, sperm production has been found to decline from around the age of 50. Although it is still possible to conceive a child, and many men do have children in their 50s or later, it may take longer for you and your partner to become pregnant. |
Why do you assume I care about getting pregnant? |
That doesn’t say what you think it says. Women in their 30s are highly likely to get pregnant. |
| Well, not necessary to have biological kids or kids at all. |
You act like that is a bad thing. You also use “children” in the plural. Most families we know have one kid. A couple have two. |
+1 |