Prince Harry and Meghan in Near Catastrophic Car Chase in NYC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are much better protections for them from paparazzi in England. All they have to do is live there.

I don't think that's true now that they're not royal. One of the reports I saw about this incident mentioned that a recent court case determined Harry cannot pay for police protection while he's in England anymore, and he's appealing that decision. So they don't get the royal treatment, pun intended, which would make them even more of a target because from what I can tell British people hate Meghan even more than DCUMers.

I think it's more split. At least among young people, it's more they're not liked, but the rest of the royals are viewed in an even more negative light. Under 50 have a majority opposed to monarchy, and under 25 flat out prefer a republic

Dismantling the country from within. So liberal teaching of global citizenship is paying off splendidly, hmm?

Or saving hundreds of millions and then making hundreds of millions more once Buckingham palace becomes a tourist attraction.

This! Have tourists pay to tour bucking bam palace, the queens chambers, etc. Kensington palace, balmoral, Windsor, all of it. If they think Stonehenge is a tourist attraction wait until people realize they can take selfies in the queens chambers at Sondringham

Buckingham Palace is already open to the public. Sandringham is private property and as properties go, pretty unlovable, and not convenient to London. Although I imagine if a republic is declared, the royals (not the UK government) would open it to the public to make money off it. Or flog it and it'd be converted into a hotel. But not relevant to the thread's topic.

If a republic is declared, there is no reason to think the royals would be left with any properties to open to the public

Sandringham and Balmoral are privately owned by the royals. The royals have clearly owned private assets. The crown jewels are state property, the private jewels you see the royals wear most of the time is privately owned. Same with various property. The UK becoming a republic isn't akin to tsarist Russia becoming a communist state. If a republic happens, it isn't going to confiscate all the royals' private assets just to make a point because that's not the kind of country the UK is. Some people clearly live in fantasy land. Perhaps like Megharry.

Yes, if the UK becomes a republic, it would be like Russia taking the wealth of the royalty. All of it. Like other penniless royals, they would all have to go live somewhere else. They wouldn't just go home and live out their lives.

You're so confident, aren't you? But this bad fanfic is really getting off topic, especially when we have a much better real life story going on.

Rubs hands gleefully. I can picture it. Miss Meghan of Montecito plotting every step of this high speed drama to keep herself relevant and in the papers, manipulating the paranoia of her dimwit husband who's never gotten over his mother's death 25 years ago. Maybe she even organized it to keep her husband's attention on her as the marriage is based on Harry rescuing from the evil, nasty presses. But the risk is that if the press loses interest in Meghan, so will Harry as she will no longer need to be saved? Harry clearly has a fixation with the damsel in distress. Hmm. Intriguing thought.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:they're such attention whoring liars. Nothing about this is true. I really wish they would go away. Thought they wanted peace and quiet? Nope, clearly not.

It's not funny to make sarcastic comments about their near catastrophic experience.

What exactly was near catastrophic?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are much better protections for them from paparazzi in England. All they have to do is live there.

I don't think that's true now that they're not royal. One of the reports I saw about this incident mentioned that a recent court case determined Harry cannot pay for police protection while he's in England anymore, and he's appealing that decision. So they don't get the royal treatment, pun intended, which would make them even more of a target because from what I can tell British people hate Meghan even more than DCUMers.

I think it's more split. At least among young people, it's more they're not liked, but the rest of the royals are viewed in an even more negative light. Under 50 have a majority opposed to monarchy, and under 25 flat out prefer a republic

Dismantling the country from within. So liberal teaching of global citizenship is paying off splendidly, hmm?

Or saving hundreds of millions and then making hundreds of millions more once Buckingham palace becomes a tourist attraction.

This! Have tourists pay to tour bucking bam palace, the queens chambers, etc. Kensington palace, balmoral, Windsor, all of it. If they think Stonehenge is a tourist attraction wait until people realize they can take selfies in the queens chambers at Sondringham

Buckingham Palace is already open to the public. Sandringham is private property and as properties go, pretty unlovable, and not convenient to London. Although I imagine if a republic is declared, the royals (not the UK government) would open it to the public to make money off it. Or flog it and it'd be converted into a hotel. But not relevant to the thread's topic.

If a republic is declared, there is no reason to think the royals would be left with any properties to open to the public

Sandringham and Balmoral are privately owned by the royals. The royals have clearly owned private assets. The crown jewels are state property, the private jewels you see the royals wear most of the time is privately owned. Same with various property. The UK becoming a republic isn't akin to tsarist Russia becoming a communist state. If a republic happens, it isn't going to confiscate all the royals' private assets just to make a point because that's not the kind of country the UK is. Some people clearly live in fantasy land. Perhaps like Megharry.

Yes, if the UK becomes a republic, it would be like Russia taking the wealth of the royalty. All of it. Like other penniless royals, they would all have to go live somewhere else. They wouldn't just go home and live out their lives.

You're so confident, aren't you? But this bad fanfic is really getting off topic, especially when we have a much better real life story going on.

Rubs hands gleefully. I can picture it. Miss Meghan of Montecito plotting every step of this high speed drama to keep herself relevant and in the papers, manipulating the paranoia of her dimwit husband who's never gotten over his mother's death 25 years ago. Maybe she even organized it to keep her husband's attention on her as the marriage is based on Harry rescuing from the evil, nasty presses. But the risk is that if the press loses interest in Meghan, so will Harry as she will no longer need to be saved? Harry clearly has a fixation with the damsel in distress. Hmm. Intriguing thought.

Confident? I don't think it'll happen, because I don't think even the under-25 set is prepared to make it happen. Sure, I could be wrong. But I just don't see it.

As for poor Harry and poor Meghan, woe are they! If they don't have something to be distressed about, they'll make it happen.

[Anonymous]

While I have mixed feelings about these 2 and think the statement released will be proven to be an exaggeration, I think it speaks volumes that DailyMail is quiet because they are complicit and part of the problem, not because it’s not newsworthy. They and other UK tabloids probably summoned those pics!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2 hours around NYC without pulling in somewhere? Seems like they are desperately trying to make a point. It reminds of the South Park episode except this could have ended very badly for some innocent passerby or police officer

+1 it seems like h&m choice to let the "chase" continue for that long made it very dangerous for pedestrians and others who did not have their level of protection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OK but can they explain why they were in a yellow taxi cab? $2000 shoes, private planes and they can't spring for a driver? Heck even an Uber black?

I want a tell all from the cab driver! Oprah please!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:they're such attention whoring liars. Nothing about this is true. I really wish they would go away. Thought they wanted peace and quiet? Nope, clearly not.

It's not funny to make sarcastic comments about their near catastrophic experience.

What exactly was near catastrophic?

The NYC mayor himself has said he finds it hard to believe there was a 2-hour chase, though he did condemn the pap’s tactics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:they're such attention whoring liars. Nothing about this is true. I really wish they would go away. Thought they wanted peace and quiet? Nope, clearly not.

It's not funny to make sarcastic comments about their near catastrophic experience.

What exactly was near catastrophic?

+1 this would have had to be pretty low speed in NYC. A fender bender for the ppl in th car. More dangerous for pedestrians etc nearby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While I have mixed feelings about these 2 and think the statement released will be proven to be an exaggeration, I think it speaks volumes that DailyMail is quiet because they are complicit and part of the problem, not because it’s not newsworthy. They and other UK tabloids probably summoned those pics!

It's already in the DM: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12095151/Harry-Meghan-involved-near-catastrophic-car-chase-New-York-spokesman-claims.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2 hours around NYC without pulling in somewhere? Seems like they are desperately trying to make a point. It reminds of the South Park episode except this could have ended very badly for some innocent passerby or police officer

This is making NYC look like a third world country. If I was NY officials I would be clapping back, terrible for tourism if they allow this to seem plausible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are much better protections for them from paparazzi in England. All they have to do is live there.

I don't think that's true now that they're not royal. One of the reports I saw about this incident mentioned that a recent court case determined Harry cannot pay for police protection while he's in England anymore, and he's appealing that decision. So they don't get the royal treatment, pun intended, which would make them even more of a target because from what I can tell British people hate Meghan even more than DCUMers.

I think it's more split. At least among young people, it's more they're not liked, but the rest of the royals are viewed in an even more negative light. Under 50 have a majority opposed to monarchy, and under 25 flat out prefer a republic

Dismantling the country from within. So liberal teaching of global citizenship is paying off splendidly, hmm?

Or saving hundreds of millions and then making hundreds of millions more once Buckingham palace becomes a tourist attraction.

This! Have tourists pay to tour bucking bam palace, the queens chambers, etc. Kensington palace, balmoral, Windsor, all of it. If they think Stonehenge is a tourist attraction wait until people realize they can take selfies in the queens chambers at Sondringham

Buckingham Palace is already open to the public. Sandringham is private property and as properties go, pretty unlovable, and not convenient to London. Although I imagine if a republic is declared, the royals (not the UK government) would open it to the public to make money off it. Or flog it and it'd be converted into a hotel. But not relevant to the thread's topic.

If a republic is declared, there is no reason to think the royals would be left with any properties to open to the public

Sandringham and Balmoral are privately owned by the royals. The royals have clearly owned private assets. The crown jewels are state property, the private jewels you see the royals wear most of the time is privately owned. Same with various property. The UK becoming a republic isn't akin to tsarist Russia becoming a communist state. If a republic happens, it isn't going to confiscate all the royals' private assets just to make a point because that's not the kind of country the UK is. Some people clearly live in fantasy land. Perhaps like Megharry.

Everything they own was either expropriated from the populace or purchased with money expropriated from the populace.

[Anonymous]

Everyone is just proving Harry correct.
You are pretty sure they are lying and...
Pretty sure they paid paparazzi to do this.
Questioning the scene, the time, the actions.
Accusing them of attention getting.
Blaming one or the other for extending a narrative.

NYPD is likely to downplay anything that makes them look bad, so remember that.
Looks like most people already have a narrative about them that they need to fulfill, regardless of what went on. So stupud, this binary team thing people choose to engage in. Everyone keeps saying they are inconsequential, yet pop right up everywhere to keep saying it.

Right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are much better protections for them from paparazzi in England. All they have to do is live there.

I don't think that's true now that they're not royal. One of the reports I saw about this incident mentioned that a recent court case determined Harry cannot pay for police protection while he's in England anymore, and he's appealing that decision. So they don't get the royal treatment, pun intended, which would make them even more of a target because from what I can tell British people hate Meghan even more than DCUMers.

I think it's more split. At least among young people, it's more they're not liked, but the rest of the royals are viewed in an even more negative light. Under 50 have a majority opposed to monarchy, and under 25 flat out prefer a republic

Dismantling the country from within. So liberal teaching of global citizenship is paying off splendidly, hmm?

Or saving hundreds of millions and then making hundreds of millions more once Buckingham palace becomes a tourist attraction.

This! Have tourists pay to tour bucking bam palace, the queens chambers, etc. Kensington palace, balmoral, Windsor, all of it. If they think Stonehenge is a tourist attraction wait until people realize they can take selfies in the queens chambers at Sondringham

Buckingham Palace is already open to the public. Sandringham is private property and as properties go, pretty unlovable, and not convenient to London. Although I imagine if a republic is declared, the royals (not the UK government) would open it to the public to make money off it. Or flog it and it'd be converted into a hotel. But not relevant to the thread's topic.

If a republic is declared, there is no reason to think the royals would be left with any properties to open to the public

Sandringham and Balmoral are privately owned by the royals. The royals have clearly owned private assets. The crown jewels are state property, the private jewels you see the royals wear most of the time is privately owned. Same with various property. The UK becoming a republic isn't akin to tsarist Russia becoming a communist state. If a republic happens, it isn't going to confiscate all the royals' private assets just to make a point because that's not the kind of country the UK is. Some people clearly live in fantasy land. Perhaps like Megharry.

Everything they own was either expropriated from the populace or purchased with money expropriated from the populace.

That's one view...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are much better protections for them from paparazzi in England. All they have to do is live there.

I don't think that's true now that they're not royal. One of the reports I saw about this incident mentioned that a recent court case determined Harry cannot pay for police protection while he's in England anymore, and he's appealing that decision. So they don't get the royal treatment, pun intended, which would make them even more of a target because from what I can tell British people hate Meghan even more than DCUMers.

I think it's more split. At least among young people, it's more they're not liked, but the rest of the royals are viewed in an even more negative light. Under 50 have a majority opposed to monarchy, and under 25 flat out prefer a republic

Dismantling the country from within. So liberal teaching of global citizenship is paying off splendidly, hmm?

Or saving hundreds of millions and then making hundreds of millions more once Buckingham palace becomes a tourist attraction.

This! Have tourists pay to tour bucking bam palace, the queens chambers, etc. Kensington palace, balmoral, Windsor, all of it. If they think Stonehenge is a tourist attraction wait until people realize they can take selfies in the queens chambers at Sondringham

Buckingham Palace is already open to the public. Sandringham is private property and as properties go, pretty unlovable, and not convenient to London. Although I imagine if a republic is declared, the royals (not the UK government) would open it to the public to make money off it. Or flog it and it'd be converted into a hotel. But not relevant to the thread's topic.

If a republic is declared, there is no reason to think the royals would be left with any properties to open to the public

Sandringham and Balmoral are privately owned by the royals. The royals have clearly owned private assets. The crown jewels are state property, the private jewels you see the royals wear most of the time is privately owned. Same with various property. The UK becoming a republic isn't akin to tsarist Russia becoming a communist state. If a republic happens, it isn't going to confiscate all the royals' private assets just to make a point because that's not the kind of country the UK is. Some people clearly live in fantasy land. Perhaps like Megharry.

Yes, if the UK becomes a republic, it would be like Russia taking the wealth of the royalty. All of it. Like other penniless royals, they would all have to go live somewhere else. They wouldn't just go home and live out their lives.

You're so confident, aren't you? But this bad fanfic is really getting off topic, especially when we have a much better real life story going on.

Rubs hands gleefully. I can picture it. Miss Meghan of Montecito plotting every step of this high speed drama to keep herself relevant and in the papers, manipulating the paranoia of her dimwit husband who's never gotten over his mother's death 25 years ago. Maybe she even organized it to keep her husband's attention on her as the marriage is based on Harry rescuing from the evil, nasty presses. But the risk is that if the press loses interest in Meghan, so will Harry as she will no longer need to be saved? Harry clearly has a fixation with the damsel in distress. Hmm. Intriguing thought.

Confident? I don't think it'll happen, because I don't think even the under-25 set is prepared to make it happen. Sure, I could be wrong. But I just don't see it.

As for poor Harry and poor Meghan, woe are they! If they don't have something to be distressed about, they'll make it happen.

We're about to see a princeling grow up without media willing to ignore indiscretions and where everyone has a camera on them 24/7. What do you think the odds are the Louis makes it to 20 without being hated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone is just proving Harry correct.
You are pretty sure they are lying and...
Pretty sure they paid paparazzi to do this.
Questioning the scene, the time, the actions.
Accusing them of attention getting.
Blaming one or the other for extending a narrative.

NYPD is likely to downplay anything that makes them look bad, so remember that.
Looks like most people already have a narrative about them that they need to fulfill, regardless of what went on. So stupud, this binary team thing people choose to engage in. Everyone keeps saying they are inconsequential, yet pop right up everywhere to keep saying it.

Right.

IKR? Poor Harry.