that's pretty good - well played I want only East and South Indian doctors, please |
| Asian, not "Indian" |
No you want the guy who got the job because he got into elite schools after his dad donated a lot of money and then he joined the white elite patronage network, joined all the right clubs, and kissed all the right asses. This is the originalist America that the Federalist Society worships. Merit has never even been in the room with privilege in this country. |
I want the guy, or girl, or whatever, who got the highest test scores, has the best teachers, the most demanding training, and excelled Don’t give one single s*** what help they had getting in the door |
|
Truth be told, though, I probably do want East Asians, not regular white folk - since they’re discriminated against in university admissions, they have to be even stronger academically than their peers of other races - probably shaping up the same way these days w the Jews, whose numbers have dropped in entering classes
|
Being a good surgeon or pilot or whatever is not just an academic exercise. Test scores are not the only or the best predictor of performance. |
agree that's why I mentioned training, and excelling - I could have been more specific though I want the people their peers want - the pilot the other pilots want flying for them, the doctor the other doctors want advice from - I seriously doubt either of those crowds is assigning much value to melanin or chromosomes in that setting |
|
I want the lady who was an Apache pilot, not one recruited into flying to help balance out the numbers - if there's only one of her for every 5 male Apache pilots, so be it
the idea that any given profession should mirror the racial & gender split of the overall population is just crazypants |
Except that's all just a lazy rhetorical truism. There is no such thing as a best pilot or best surgeon. There's best pilots and best surgeons for a particular situation. I wouldn't necessarily want the Air America guys to fly American Air. I don't want Ben Carson doing hernia surgery. I want the best option for the situation I am in. And the best person for each option varies widely. Casting a wider net for talent while still keeping standards strong enables us to maximize our range of specialized bests and expand the skillset of each profession. |
DP. How about most competent? That's all I want. |
The point is that giving a shit about inclusion is not anti-merit. The assumption that the historically privileged people are inherently more deserving to control and lead everything is the problem. It’s why we have institutions and experts that commit catastrophic blunders because they don’t know how much they don’t know about the world outside their bubble. Inclusion doesn’t crash economies or start wars or mismanage emergencies. Well-educated elite experts in group think bubbles do that shit continually. |
|
If giving a shit about inclusion does not require selectively reducing standards for certain applicants based on characteristics of theirs that are irrelevant to the job, then I’m totally cool with it
Everything above about specialization and fallibility is of course correct - just orthogonal to the issue of whether to tinker with workforce composition as an end in itself, to the detriment of qualifications |