+100 At our high school’s graduation this year, many formally GE kids went to (much) better colleges than their former AAP peers. |
+1 And yes, I understand that some higher Gen Ed kids will take honors or AP classes in high school. That’s fine. I’m talking about the kids who won’t ever be taking those kinds of classes - we all know those types. In elementary they have a huge range of abilities in one class. Won’t have that once you get to higher level courses. The ones who can’t handle it will be weeded out. |
LD kids make up a tiny percentage of all students. The vast majority of kids will be taking honors and/or AP classes in high school. Sorry to disappoint you. |
We’re not talking about “a kid who can’t read.” We’re talking about all the bright, formerly GE kids who were indistinguishable from your AAP kid. They will all be in the same advanced classes in high school. |
You all are so stupid you don’t even understand what I’m talking about. This isn’t about asking who was in AAP or who got into a better college. I am simply stating some kids won’t be in the higher level course. That is a fact. DCUM at its finest! |
Well I am. I’m talking about kids who can’t read, special Ed, major issues. In AAP in elementary, and to an extent in middle, you get away from those kids. They won’t be in your classes. That is part of the draw of AAP in Elementary for many parents. And this will continue in high school. Those kids will never join honors of AP classes. |
Bright kids from Gen Ed? Fine! We wanted our kids away from the really low kids. That’s why I like AAP. |
Maybe that’s because no one can believe there is a parent here stating something so unbelievably obvious. You’re bizarrely talking about a tiny subsection of kids with SN. This conversation is about the minuscule differences (if any) between the vast majority GE and AAP kids and the fact that once in high school, 99% of them will be taking the same classes. The only person hung up on kids with LD or SN is you. An you’re calling others “stupid”? No doubt you pass that charming trait along to your snowflake as well. |
Ugh, you are insufferable. No doubt parents of those “really low” kids are thrilled to be away from your kid. You are just gross. DP |
Interesting. Most of the poorly behaved kids at our elementary school are in AAP. I feel sorry for those teachers. |
| This is some pretty gross ableism going on in this thread. Some of the smartest people I know as adults were thought to be “slow” as kids because they had undiagnosed dyslexia. And these people bragging about getting away from certain types of kids seem to be forgetting about the twice exceptional kids that can be quite challenging. I hope karma comes for some of you smug AAP parents. |
| Second class citizenship |
You’d like to think that to make yourself feel better but it just isn’t true. Teachers love teaching the AAP class. They have fewer behavioral issues and more kids who can do and have great family support and want to learn! They don’t have nearly as many IEP or 504 meetings to prepare for and sit in on. It is just so much easier teaching the AAP kids. |
No, we all get it. Congratulations on your kids “winning” high school. |
I have taught both. The issue is AAP is just more manageable because you have a smaller gaps of needs. In a Gen Ed class you can have students who cannot read all the way to kids who are above grade level. AAP classes students are all at or above. The larger issue is ESOL/SPED supports. We are the only country that just puts all levels in a classroom without enough support and that pressure falls on the teacher. The staffing formulas are abysmal in ES. |