California "accidentally" releases list of CCP holders

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no reason why this should be private information, but I'd restrict release to name and city of residence.

Um - maybe because you are too dumb to realize this leak is a virtual “hit list” for home-burglars looking for guns?

Judges and DAs are on that list too, BTW.

That makes no sense. Guns protect owners, right? If the permit holder is home, they can shoot the burglar and if he/she isn’t home, he/she will be wearing the gun and thus nothing to steal.

[Anonymous]

I’m in Los Angeles and this didn’t even make our local news.

No one cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t see why this is a problem.

Me either. Now I know who’s homes to break into to steal guns!!!!

Thanks CA DOJ!!!

Signed,

Any criminal with internet access

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no reason why this should be private information, but I'd restrict release to name and city of residence.

Um - maybe because you are too dumb to realize this leak is a virtual “hit list” for home-burglars looking for guns?

Judges and DAs are on that list too, BTW.

That makes no sense. Guns protect owners, right? If the permit holder is home, they can shoot the burglar and if he/she isn’t home, he/she will be wearing the gun and thus nothing to steal.

You’re playing dumb.

Not even the most obtuse anti-gun dolt is this stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.... their names, addresses, phone numbers, genders, birthdays and race.
This came from the AG office.

It is hard to believe that this is accidental. Hope someone sues.

Homes with no one there will obviously be targeted by criminals. They’ll ransack the property until they find the gun. Yay! More ILLEGAL (now) guns across America in the hands of killers.

Why do Democrats seem to assume that the killers will shoot at only Republicans?

Because a public list will deter people from buying guns.

I don’t have a gun and leaks like this only help the violent minded find me. How can anybody think this leak is helping???

Huh? You think criminals are going to check this list before they rob you?

Yes, they absolutely will.

Why do you think criminals are too dumb to do an internet search?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no reason why this should be private information, but I'd restrict release to name and city of residence.

Um - maybe because you are too dumb to realize this leak is a virtual “hit list” for home-burglars looking for guns?

Judges and DAs are on that list too, BTW.

That makes no sense. Guns protect owners, right? If the permit holder is home, they can shoot the burglar and if he/she isn’t home, he/she will be wearing the gun and thus nothing to steal.

You’re playing dumb.

Not even the most obtuse anti-gun dolt is this stupid.

No, I am far from dumb and stand by my post. If guns don’t protect property and persons, why have them? If they’re stored properly, a thief cannot take them.

DH is LO and forced to be armed in public. I know what I’m talking about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m in Los Angeles and this didn’t even make our local news.

No one cares.

No one cares. This is Fox manufactured news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.... their names, addresses, phone numbers, genders, birthdays and race.
This came from the AG office.

It is hard to believe that this is accidental. Hope someone sues.

Homes with no one there will obviously be targeted by criminals. They’ll ransack the property until they find the gun. Yay! More ILLEGAL (now) guns across America in the hands of killers.

Why do Democrats seem to assume that the killers will shoot at only Republicans?

Because a public list will deter people from buying guns.

I don’t have a gun and leaks like this only help the violent minded find me. How can anybody think this leak is helping???

Huh? You think criminals are going to check this list before they rob you?

Yes, the violent minded mugger is going to do a quick photo recognition to get your name and then make sure you aren’t on the list before mugging you.

You can’t possibly be this dumb. I refuse to believe that.


It’s not the “violent-minded mugger” who’ll be checking the list. It’s the gang member who’s looking for homes to burglarize when the residents aren’t home so they can steal a gun.

If you have a list of addresses where you *know* there’s a gun, then that really helps filter out the homes you’ll want to break into when looking for guns to steal.


Why do democrats want more guns stolen and put on the streets?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no reason why this should be private information, but I'd restrict release to name and city of residence.

Um - maybe because you are too dumb to realize this leak is a virtual “hit list” for home-burglars looking for guns?

Judges and DAs are on that list too, BTW.

That makes no sense. Guns protect owners, right? If the permit holder is home, they can shoot the burglar and if he/she isn’t home, he/she will be wearing the gun and thus nothing to steal.

You’re playing dumb.

Not even the most obtuse anti-gun dolt is this stupid.

No, I am far from dumb and stand by my post. If guns don’t protect property and persons, why have them? If they’re stored properly, a thief cannot take them.

DH is LO and forced to be armed in public. I know what I’m talking about.

No, you don’t know what you’re talking about. And your “LO” DH (by the way, it’s “LEO”, not “LO” - something ANY LEO-spouse would know, btw) would certainly understand why lists of CCW holders shouldn’t be public record (domestic violence victims, people with protective orders, stalkers, etc).

Why do you want to victimize women who are trying to hide from an abuser? Why do you support domestic violence abusers knowing where their victims are? I think you owe everyone here an explanation for that. Well?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.... their names, addresses, phone numbers, genders, birthdays and race.
This came from the AG office.

It is hard to believe that this is accidental. Hope someone sues.

Homes with no one there will obviously be targeted by criminals. They’ll ransack the property until they find the gun. Yay! More ILLEGAL (now) guns across America in the hands of killers.

Why do Democrats seem to assume that the killers will shoot at only Republicans?

Because a public list will deter people from buying guns.

I don’t have a gun and leaks like this only help the violent minded find me. How can anybody think this leak is helping???

Huh? You think criminals are going to check this list before they rob you?

Yes, the violent minded mugger is going to do a quick photo recognition to get your name and then make sure you aren’t on the list before mugging you.

You can’t possibly be this dumb. I refuse to believe that.


It’s not the “violent-minded mugger” who’ll be checking the list. It’s the gang member who’s looking for homes to burglarize when the residents aren’t home so they can steal a gun.

If you have a list of addresses where you *know* there’s a gun, then that really helps filter out the homes you’ll want to break into when looking for guns to steal.


Why do democrats want more guns stolen and put on the streets?

Why won’t Republicans put a lock on the door? Store your guns in a secure way and you have nothing to worry about. This insistence on just leaving guns around for kids to blast each other apart and criminals to steal just blows my mind. It’s a weapon of death - have some respect for it and secure it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no reason why this should be private information, but I'd restrict release to name and city of residence.

Um - maybe because you are too dumb to realize this leak is a virtual “hit list” for home-burglars looking for guns?

Judges and DAs are on that list too, BTW.

That makes no sense. Guns protect owners, right? If the permit holder is home, they can shoot the burglar and if he/she isn’t home, he/she will be wearing the gun and thus nothing to steal.

Do you not realize that people who own a gun typically own more than one? So if they’re carrying one while away from the home - where do you suppose the other guns are?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.... their names, addresses, phone numbers, genders, birthdays and race.
This came from the AG office.

It is hard to believe that this is accidental. Hope someone sues.

Homes with no one there will obviously be targeted by criminals. They’ll ransack the property until they find the gun. Yay! More ILLEGAL (now) guns across America in the hands of killers.

Why do Democrats seem to assume that the killers will shoot at only Republicans?

Because a public list will deter people from buying guns.

I don’t have a gun and leaks like this only help the violent minded find me. How can anybody think this leak is helping???

Huh? You think criminals are going to check this list before they rob you?

Yes, the violent minded mugger is going to do a quick photo recognition to get your name and then make sure you aren’t on the list before mugging you.

You can’t possibly be this dumb. I refuse to believe that.


It’s not the “violent-minded mugger” who’ll be checking the list. It’s the gang member who’s looking for homes to burglarize when the residents aren’t home so they can steal a gun.

If you have a list of addresses where you *know* there’s a gun, then that really helps filter out the homes you’ll want to break into when looking for guns to steal.


Why do democrats want more guns stolen and put on the streets?

Why won’t Republicans put a lock on the door? Store your guns in a secure way and you have nothing to worry about. This insistence on just leaving guns around for kids to blast each other apart and criminals to steal just blows my mind. It’s a weapon of death - have some respect for it and secure it.

The door is locked. The gun is stored in a metal safe approved by the CA DOJ (in California, according to CA law).

And a house can still be broken into, and a safe cut open by a burglar with the proper tools (available at any Home Depot), in spite of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no reason why this should be private information, but I'd restrict release to name and city of residence.

Um - maybe because you are too dumb to realize this leak is a virtual “hit list” for home-burglars looking for guns?

Judges and DAs are on that list too, BTW.

That makes no sense. Guns protect owners, right? If the permit holder is home, they can shoot the burglar and if he/she isn’t home, he/she will be wearing the gun and thus nothing to steal.

Do you not realize that people who own a gun typically own more than one? So if they’re carrying one while away from the home - where do you suppose the other guns are?

Knowing gun nuts? Probably propping open the door to the pool so the toddler has easier access to both.

[Anonymous]

LOL. The fake outrage. I have a CCP permit, I wouldn't care if my info is leaked.

Let them get past the big dogs and the alarm first and then they'll meet me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t see why this is a problem.

If you are a criminal looking for a gun, you know where to find one now.

But they are locked up so no worries.

Find the most expensive safe you can buy.

I’ll bet you $10,000 I can get into it in less than 2 hours.

Bet?