So you’re saying if they test and test positive then it’s a problem. But if they don’t test and don’t know, it’s not. That just shows how flimsy the case for keeping people home who are asymptotic - even if they test positive. |
| Per the CDC, if you test positive for COVID-19 on either a rapid antigen or PCR test, you are required to self-isolate – whether you are vaccinated or not. Do not leave your home, except to get medical care. Do not visit public areas. Self-isolation means separating yourself from others to keep YOUR germs from spreading. It’s about protecting OTHERS, regardless of whether you’re symptomatic or asymptomatic. |
And I said I was fine with that. What wasn’t clear about that? If I don’t care if someone doesn’t test and comes into work, why would I care if they do test and come into work? Potentially being exposed to an asymptomatic person with covid is just like potentially being exposed to someone with asymptomatic cold/flu. It’s a risk I accepted without a second thought long ago. |
NP Answer is I am comfortable...so comfortable that I don't even want people to be testing unless they have symptoms. Most asymptomatic people are not even contagious. And so what if they do infect me...it will be a little cold. If I am really concerned, I will wear my N95 mask. |
So if I’m your coworker and I test positive and let you know I’m Covid positive, you are comfortable working with me all day in a small room? I would want my coworker to stay home for the recommended five days. I guess we have to agree to disagree on this point. |
I really don’t see how that’s practically any different than someone that just doesn’t test. |
Here's the problem with your scenario. People should not be testing if there are no symptoms. See? Problem solved. |
That’s a given. Who tests for asymptomatic infections? |
I’m not talking about randomly testing throughout the week. If one of my kids tests positive, then my husband and I would also test ourselves. Wouldn’t you do the same? If one of us tests positive, we would adhere to the recommended five day isolation and stay at home and not go into work. We would stay home IF we test positive. See? |
You’re not vaccinated? The guidelines say you don't need to test. Obviously that doesn't mean you can't get infected, but it demonstrates that from a public health perspective there's an acceptance that people will get covid and need to carry on with their lives. |
Where did I say I was not vaccinated? Of course I'm vaccinated. The above situation actually did happen with our family. One of our children tested positive (highly symptomatic) on a Sunday. At the time, Covid was running rampant within her school. The rest of us continued to go to school and work until we tested positive. I tested positive on Wednesday. I was also highly symptomatic and very sick. After testing postive, I stayed home from work for the recommened period of time. We all ended up testing positive within 10 days of child#1. One of our children was essentially asymptomatic, but we kept her home from school...because that's what is required and it makes sense. According to many of the posters, we should have just sent her to school because she was asymptomatic. |
Why? How many times would you test? You could be infected in the morning, the afternoon, day two, day three, day four, etc. When would you test and call it good? If I felt ill, I’d just stay home and call it a day. |
I did test once I had symptoms. Not before. |
m You left out the part about being symptomatic. The posts had been about asymptomatic individuals. I don’t think anyone was suggesting people that are actively showing symptoms that would otherwise dictate staying home should go out with covid. They’re saying people without symptoms should do whatever they want, regardless of whether they decide to test or not. |
Thats really crummy to go to work and school when you know here is a god chance you'll test positive soon an infect school and work. |