Mary Cheh backs Tricia Duncan for Ward 3 Councilmember

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really more of an earthmover than a bulldozer but that's not as poetic.

It’s a loader, is it not? Not a backhoe, thankfully.

I'd call it a wheel loader. Not really the right tool for clearing mature trees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really more of an earthmover than a bulldozer but that's not as poetic.

It’s a loader, is it not? Not a backhoe, thankfully.

I'd call it a wheel loader. Not really the right tool for clearing mature trees.

What we've come to expect from the Foxhallers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really more of an earthmover than a bulldozer but that's not as poetic.

It’s a loader, is it not? Not a backhoe, thankfully.

Tricia "The 'Hoe" Duncan has a certain ring to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really more of an earthmover than a bulldozer but that's not as poetic.

It’s a loader, is it not? Not a backhoe, thankfully.

Tricia "The 'Hoe" Duncan has a certain ring to it.

The way this campaign is headed, Vladimir Zhironovsky would have felt right at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really more of an earthmover than a bulldozer but that's not as poetic.

It’s a loader, is it not? Not a backhoe, thankfully.

I'd call it a wheel loader. Not really the right tool for clearing mature trees.

What we've come to expect from the Foxhallers.

Apparently, it’s only a problem if the trees are to be replaced by public school children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mary’s endorsement seems to have sent the NIMBYs into a panic. I’m seeing their “Save Hardy Park. No to Tricia Duncan” up on NE Ave and the partner of the FCCA President is sending ridiculous three-page accounts detailing her interactions with Tricia to all of the local listserves. They sure know how to get someone elected!

I am going to presume that Cheh gave her the kiss of death on purpose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mary’s endorsement seems to have sent the NIMBYs into a panic. I’m seeing their “Save Hardy Park. No to Tricia Duncan” up on NE Ave and the partner of the FCCA President is sending ridiculous three-page accounts detailing her interactions with Tricia to all of the local listserves. They sure know how to get someone elected!

I am going to presume that Cheh gave her the kiss of death on purpose.

Do you all actually think people didn’t like Mary??? Especially in Ward 3???

The Post endorsed her opponent in 2018 and she still absolutely trounced him. She would have won again with over 70% of the vote. The way I see it, her endorsement makes this a three way race between Frumin, Goulet, and Duncan. I despise Goulet and think he would be disastrous for both our ward and the city. I like Frumin well enough, but his positions on building new schools in Ward 3 have really disappointed me. I will be voting for Tricia Duncan. We can’t let Goulet win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mary’s endorsement seems to have sent the NIMBYs into a panic. I’m seeing their “Save Hardy Park. No to Tricia Duncan” up on NE Ave and the partner of the FCCA President is sending ridiculous three-page accounts detailing her interactions with Tricia to all of the local listserves. They sure know how to get someone elected!

I am going to presume that Cheh gave her the kiss of death on purpose.

Do you all actually think people didn’t like Mary??? Especially in Ward 3???

The Post endorsed her opponent in 2018 and she still absolutely trounced him. She would have won again with over 70% of the vote. The way I see it, her endorsement makes this a three way race between Frumin, Goulet, and Duncan. I despise Goulet and think he would be disastrous for both our ward and the city. I like Frumin well enough, but his positions on building new schools in Ward 3 have really disappointed me. I will be voting for Tricia Duncan. We can’t let Goulet win.

I agree that it's become a three-way race. The others - Bergman, Brown, Cohen, Finley, Thomas etc. - are all very fine candidates, but are only helping Goulet by hanging around at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mary’s endorsement seems to have sent the NIMBYs into a panic. I’m seeing their “Save Hardy Park. No to Tricia Duncan” up on NE Ave and the partner of the FCCA President is sending ridiculous three-page accounts detailing her interactions with Tricia to all of the local listserves. They sure know how to get someone elected!

I am going to presume that Cheh gave her the kiss of death on purpose.

Any action that causes the likes of the FCCA to start a negative campaign against a candidate is greatly beneficial to that candidate, especially in a crowded field. DC has by far the greatest concentration of political strategists in the entire world and yet you have the likes of the FCCA doing insanely boneheaded things.

[Anonymous]

I don't know who is more pathetic- the person putting up the anti-Duncan signs, or Duncan's crony who stole them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know who is more pathetic- the person putting up the anti-Duncan signs, or Duncan's crony who stole them.

Why would a supporter of Duncan remove them? It was free advertising for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know who is more pathetic- the person putting up the anti-Duncan signs, or Duncan's crony who stole them.

Why would a supporter of Duncan remove them? It was free advertising for her.

Someone just shared photos of a city worker removing them. It wasn't anyone to do with Tricia Duncan.

And, yes, the signs helped make the case that one should be voting for Tricia Duncan. You can learn a lot about someone by the character and tenor of those attacking them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know who is more pathetic- the person putting up the anti-Duncan signs, or Duncan's crony who stole them.

Why would a supporter of Duncan remove them? It was free advertising for her.

Someone just shared photos of a city worker removing them. It wasn't anyone to do with Tricia Duncan.

And, yes, the signs helped make the case that one should be voting for Tricia Duncan. You can learn a lot about someone by the character and tenor of those attacking them.

What candidate was supposed to be the beneficiary of the signs? Goulet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know who is more pathetic- the person putting up the anti-Duncan signs, or Duncan's crony who stole them.

Why would a supporter of Duncan remove them? It was free advertising for her.

Someone just shared photos of a city worker removing them. It wasn't anyone to do with Tricia Duncan.

And, yes, the signs helped make the case that one should be voting for Tricia Duncan. You can learn a lot about someone by the character and tenor of those attacking them.

What candidate was supposed to be the beneficiary of the signs? Goulet?

Hard to say. The Foxhallers were backing Goulet, but seem to have just figured out that his position on the schools changes depending on who he is talking to.

[Anonymous]

No surprise that Cheh endorsed Duncan. They both believe they are smarter than they are, don’t listen to other points of view, and can be stubborn.