When will Rs admit their 'great replacement' conspiracy is a national security threat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

Oh hey, it's the inevitable "both sides!" guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

"Both sides" aren't committing mass shootings based on racist ideology. It is one side that keeps doing it. And for reasons I do not understand, very few Republicans are willing to speak out against the racist underpinnings of this crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

Oh hey, it's the inevitable "both sides!" guy.

Its not "both sides." Violent extremists are not on our side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

"Both sides" aren't committing mass shootings based on racist ideology. It is one side that keeps doing it. And for reasons I do not understand, very few Republicans are willing to speak out against the racist underpinnings of this crime.

No, violent people are not part of any party's "side". Is al qaeda on Islam's side? No. This is all crazy talk and I am tired of it.

[Anonymous]

It's dumb for Republicans to bark up this tree. The guy had a 150 page political manifesto that echoes many of the same talking points pushed by Trump, Tucker Carlson, etc. Of course, the killer went waaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond anything espoused by Tucker. But that train of thought has been normalized by mainstream Republicans. Arguing otherwise is just dumb and foolish.

It started with birtherism a decade ago and has now spawned into attacking random shopping centers frequented by certain ethnic groups. This is all connected and points to an increasing radicalization in America.

[Anonymous]

And untreated, ignored mental illness

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

Oh hey, it's the inevitable "both sides!" guy.

Its not "both sides." Violent extremists are not on our side.

Did you see Stefanik’s tweet? Have you seen Tucker Carlson spouting replacement theory for years? Donald Trump “very fine people one both sides”? It’s the GOP. The loving embrace Kyle Rittenhouse received from the GOP? The GOP embraces violent extremists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's dumb for Republicans to bark up this tree. The guy had a 150 page political manifesto that echoes many of the same talking points pushed by Trump, Tucker Carlson, etc. Of course, the killer went waaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond anything espoused by Tucker. But that train of thought has been normalized by mainstream Republicans. Arguing otherwise is just dumb and foolish.

It started with birtherism a decade ago and has now spawned into attacking random shopping centers frequented by certain ethnic groups. This is all connected and points to an increasing radicalization in America.

This is not a very informed take. Go look into radicalization. After decades of studying this, experts now have near consensus that the ideology is irrelevant. First these people have violent ideations, THEN they adopt an ideology to justify their actions. Once America sobers up from this era, you will realize how insane it is to think a Glenn Beck listening grandma was cheering on a mass murderer killing people in a supermarket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

Oh hey, it's the inevitable "both sides!" guy.

Its not "both sides." Violent extremists are not on our side.

Did you see Stefanik’s tweet? Have you seen Tucker Carlson spouting replacement theory for years? Donald Trump “very fine people one both sides”? It’s the GOP. The loving embrace Kyle Rittenhouse received from the GOP? The GOP embraces violent extremists.

And after 9/11, people were hyperventilating whenever a muslim said something even marginally critical of the US's policies in the middle east. Some of the comments are crazy, yes. But this idea that people side with extremsists of ANY political stripe is completely insane. I dont think every democrat wants to shoot congressmen playing softball and I can assure most republicans dont see that loser in buffalo as being on their side.

[Anonymous]

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/697544.page

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

Oh hey, it's the inevitable "both sides!" guy.

Its not "both sides." Violent extremists are not on our side.

Did you see Stefanik’s tweet? Have you seen Tucker Carlson spouting replacement theory for years? Donald Trump “very fine people one both sides”? It’s the GOP. The loving embrace Kyle Rittenhouse received from the GOP? The GOP embraces violent extremists.

And after 9/11, people were hyperventilating whenever a muslim said something even marginally critical of the US's policies in the middle east. Some of the comments are crazy, yes. But this idea that people side with extremsists of ANY political stripe is completely insane. I dont think every democrat wants to shoot congressmen playing softball and I can assure most republicans dont see that loser in buffalo as being on their side.

No one takes people like you seriously when you “both sides” this stuff. No one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

Oh hey, it's the inevitable "both sides!" guy.

Its not "both sides." Violent extremists are not on our side.

Did you see Stefanik’s tweet? Have you seen Tucker Carlson spouting replacement theory for years? Donald Trump “very fine people one both sides”? It’s the GOP. The loving embrace Kyle Rittenhouse received from the GOP? The GOP embraces violent extremists.

And after 9/11, people were hyperventilating whenever a muslim said something even marginally critical of the US's policies in the middle east. Some of the comments are crazy, yes. But this idea that people side with extremsists of ANY political stripe is completely insane. I dont think every democrat wants to shoot congressmen playing softball and I can assure most republicans dont see that loser in buffalo as being on their side.

Why do Rs keep voting for more and more extreme poltiicians? It's gotten worse every year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

Oh hey, it's the inevitable "both sides!" guy.

Its not "both sides." Violent extremists are not on our side.

Did you see Stefanik’s tweet? Have you seen Tucker Carlson spouting replacement theory for years? Donald Trump “very fine people one both sides”? It’s the GOP. The loving embrace Kyle Rittenhouse received from the GOP? The GOP embraces violent extremists.

And after 9/11, people were hyperventilating whenever a muslim said something even marginally critical of the US's policies in the middle east. Some of the comments are crazy, yes. But this idea that people side with extremsists of ANY political stripe is completely insane. I dont think every democrat wants to shoot congressmen playing softball and I can assure most republicans dont see that loser in buffalo as being on their side.

No one takes people like you seriously when you “both sides” this stuff. No one.

Let me be clear: "both sides" is a false dichotomy. Even the phrase suggests, falsely, that one or both sides embraces violence. This is 100% Grade A BS.

[Anonymous]

Where can I find a coherent explanation about "replacement theory"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where can I find a coherent explanation about "replacement theory"?

Third post in this thread.