When will Rs admit their 'great replacement' conspiracy is a national security threat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/697544.page

Nothing new.

People are so clueless about basic demographics. The ignorance is maddening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where can I find a coherent explanation about "replacement theory"?

In Tucker Carlson’s words:

[Anonymous]

You are pegging Americans against Americans and instigating conflict when you say this, do you not realize this? No, it's not ok to say that half of the country represents national security threat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are pegging Americans against Americans and instigating conflict when you say this, do you not realize this? No, it's not ok to say that half of the country represents national security threat.

Republicans are not "half of the country".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where can I find a coherent explanation about "replacement theory"?

In Tucker Carlson’s words:

Note the mainstream Republicans on this thread glossing right over this, even as they usually like to brag that he’s the most popular talking head. Schrodinger’s Fascist. He is the most popular person in media but no one watches him, somehow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are pegging Americans against Americans and instigating conflict when you say this, do you not realize this? No, it's not ok to say that half of the country represents national security threat.

Not OP but I think they mean the Republican Party/donor class & right wing media. The party HAS changed. Look how moderate Stefanik has embraced the racist MAGA element.

If you personally identify as Republican you may want to look to see if your values align with the MAGA Republicans who are the dominant faction. When you vote for GOP, you’re voting for the party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rs dont believe in replacement theory. White supremacists do.

Don’t waste your energy, PP. Loons gotta loon. Trey Gowdy had a very powerful show tonight on the Buffalo shooting and white supremacists/extremists. Fox News, btw.

https://www.foxnews.com/shows/sunday-night-in-america-with-trey-gowdy

Political parties are organizations that do not have “beliefs” at all. Only people can have them. Just like games don’t have “integrity”; only the players can. But I don’t think you are saying that. I think you are saying the replacement theorists aren’t true Republicans. They are. The GOP is a membership organization. It’s positions are whatever it’s leaders say they are. The same way that today’s GOP does not have the same principles as it did under Abe Lincoln, which was different from Teddy Roosevelt, which was different again from Ike, and then again Reagan and Bush. Tucker Carlson has used it over 400 times on his show. If you expect me to swallow that TC is not a shill for the GOP, then you’re dumber than a bag of hammers. TC has been defended by Trump and Trumpies like Matt Gaetz and Stefanik.

Why are you responding to a post about Trey Gowdy with a rant about Tucker Carlson?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

You, sir or madam, are far too rational for this thread. Or this forum, for that matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

"Both sides" aren't committing mass shootings based on racist ideology. It is one side that keeps doing it. And for reasons I do not understand, very few Republicans are willing to speak out against the racist underpinnings of this crime.

Um, did you read 13:43's post and click on those links? And the Steve Scalise shooter was absolutely a LWNJ domestic terrorist. Spare us all.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its ridiculous to argue about the relative merits of one mass murderer vs another. We dont have to be on the side of people waving Nazi flags and storming the Capitol, or the side of the people burning down buildings and advocating for the overthrow of capitalism. The fact that normal people now think you have to argue in favor of one extremist cause or another is shameful. No, normal republicans are not white supremacists and they have no intention to start a civil war. Use your heads, people, and side with ANYONE who wants to protect our democratic system regardless of party.

Oh hey, it's the inevitable "both sides!" guy.

Its not "both sides." Violent extremists are not on our side.

Did you see Stefanik’s tweet? Have you seen Tucker Carlson spouting replacement theory for years? Donald Trump “very fine people one both sides”? It’s the GOP. The loving embrace Kyle Rittenhouse received from the GOP? The GOP embraces violent extremists.

And after 9/11, people were hyperventilating whenever a muslim said something even marginally critical of the US's policies in the middle east. Some of the comments are crazy, yes. But this idea that people side with extremsists of ANY political stripe is completely insane. I dont think every democrat wants to shoot congressmen playing softball and I can assure most republicans dont see that loser in buffalo as being on their side.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where can I find a coherent explanation about "replacement theory"?

In Tucker Carlson’s words:

Note the mainstream Republicans on this thread glossing right over this, even as they usually like to brag that he’s the most popular talking head. Schrodinger’s Fascist. He is the most popular person in media but no one watches him, somehow.

Mainstream republican here and we already dismissed Tucker, within this thread, as an idiot. Go ask the Bidens why they are such good friends with this bombastic bellend: https://www.businessinsider.com/hunter-biden-tucker-carlsons-close-friendship-revealed-in-email-expose-2021-12?op=1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where can I find a coherent explanation about "replacement theory"?

In Tucker Carlson’s words:

Note the mainstream Republicans on this thread glossing right over this, even as they usually like to brag that he’s the most popular talking head. Schrodinger’s Fascist. He is the most popular person in media but no one watches him, somehow.

Exactly.

“Tucker who?”

[Anonymous]

Here’s a Republican who has the balls to admit it:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stoking white fear of minorities is how Republicans get low info voters to vote against their self-interest. They're not going to change tactics any time soon no matter how many innocent people are killed.

Again, read Michael Moore’s quote on the first page. The left quotes the Great Replacement Theory all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a Republican who has the balls to admit it:

Her father is a racist and a war criminal who has the blood of hundreds of thousands of brown people on his hands. Please stop.