UArizona or UIowa

Anonymous
That is the only way for people to weigh in on academics since the reality is that neither of these schools are selective state schools. That is why folks are discussing the weather. Frankly, it makes no sense why OP is even choosing between these schools, after visiting most people would have a strong preference for one over the other. The is also a DC centric board. The is also a DC centric board. A lot of us would rather gouge our eyes out than live in either Iowa or AZ.


Seriously? i think going to a Big Ten university town in the Midwest or a funky desert city in the Southwest for four years would appeal precisely because they're each so very different from the same old same old mid-Atlantic scenery DCUM readers are so familiar with. Some DCUM readers are as parochial in their worldview as that old New Yorker cover of "a New Yorker's View of the World" -- civilization stops at Pittsburgh with little isolated colonies in Ann Arbor, Evanston, Hyde Park, the Bay Area, and Westwood.

And actually Iowa and Arizona are two universities that stand out for being relatively highly ranked for ed quality (certainly in the top half of nationwide flagships) relative to their (high) acceptance rates. Congratulations to OP for not being limited by the usual DCUM biases.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DH and I are from the midwest and now live in AZ. Would never ever move back. U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking.


How do you know where OP's kid wants to live/work? For instance, I never want to live in the water-deprived SW again. And I love Tucson. It just seems so dead-end for the future in terms of climate. (Not sure I want to live in Iowa though either with the floods!). Chicago and other northern midwest cities are on the up-swing with climate change for the long term--and they also aren't going to be flooded with retirees like AZ--so I'd rather settle there if I were a young job-seeker. (Not saying that anyone should share my tastes--just saying that we don't know what OP's are).


Are you illiterate? I said it depends on where they want to live. Grew up in Chicago. It sucks and would never move back. This isn't about you it's about OP. You don't seem to know much about Chicago or AZ so I don't know why you're even in this conversation. If you did you would know it's not retirees flooding AZ.


I grew up in Chicago and lived in AZ.
You said " U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking." Your phrasing suggests you think they don't want to stay in the midwest and you think they want to stay in the SW.

And Arizona is the #2 net migration location for retirees after Florida according to the most recent US Census Bureau report.





Retirees aren't the only people on the move you know. Most people moving to AZ these days are from California.
https://azbigmedia.com/lifestyle/top-10-states-people-are-leaving-and-moving-to-arizona/

Millennials in particular are flocking to Phoenix. https://www.inmaricopa.com/phoenix-popular-city-millennials-moving-west-south/

The OP doesn't say where they live at all, I didn't assume they are even currently in the midwest. So if not even from the midwest why would they want to stay after graduation? Iowa is getting older and grayer, upwardly mobile young people tend to move out and never come back. Arizona is more attractive to long people for obvious reason as backed up by migration patterns as well. This doesn't seem to be a hard decision. Unless you live in Iowa and want in state tuition, but again, OP is short on the details.


Still, a 36000 net migration of retirees to AZ surpasses all their other generational migration.


Arizona isn't even in the top half of the oldest states by age. Illinois and Iowa both have a higher average age. So if you're trying to avoid the retirees why would you stay in the midwest?

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/states-with-the-oldest-population.html
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/oldest-states


The point isn't to avoid retirees--but a net migration of downsizing retirees ups the costs and diminishes the supply for housing for singles/couples.


But the argument here is that most people don't stay where they went to college, so who cares? If OPs child has no interest in staying in AZ or IA then it matters not at all. These schools are similar in almost every regard so it comes down to a personal decision there is no right answer. OP asked for opinions and is getting them.


Schools have local networking opportunities though and your friends in these schools are often likely to stay in the rough area. I think it matters in the decision-making.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DH and I are from the midwest and now live in AZ. Would never ever move back. U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking.


How do you know where OP's kid wants to live/work? For instance, I never want to live in the water-deprived SW again. And I love Tucson. It just seems so dead-end for the future in terms of climate. (Not sure I want to live in Iowa though either with the floods!). Chicago and other northern midwest cities are on the up-swing with climate change for the long term--and they also aren't going to be flooded with retirees like AZ--so I'd rather settle there if I were a young job-seeker. (Not saying that anyone should share my tastes--just saying that we don't know what OP's are).


Are you illiterate? I said it depends on where they want to live. Grew up in Chicago. It sucks and would never move back. This isn't about you it's about OP. You don't seem to know much about Chicago or AZ so I don't know why you're even in this conversation. If you did you would know it's not retirees flooding AZ.


I grew up in Chicago and lived in AZ.
You said " U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking." Your phrasing suggests you think they don't want to stay in the midwest and you think they want to stay in the SW.

And Arizona is the #2 net migration location for retirees after Florida according to the most recent US Census Bureau report.





Retirees aren't the only people on the move you know. Most people moving to AZ these days are from California.
https://azbigmedia.com/lifestyle/top-10-states-people-are-leaving-and-moving-to-arizona/

Millennials in particular are flocking to Phoenix. https://www.inmaricopa.com/phoenix-popular-city-millennials-moving-west-south/

The OP doesn't say where they live at all, I didn't assume they are even currently in the midwest. So if not even from the midwest why would they want to stay after graduation? Iowa is getting older and grayer, upwardly mobile young people tend to move out and never come back. Arizona is more attractive to long people for obvious reason as backed up by migration patterns as well. This doesn't seem to be a hard decision. Unless you live in Iowa and want in state tuition, but again, OP is short on the details.


Still, a 36000 net migration of retirees to AZ surpasses all their other generational migration.


Arizona isn't even in the top half of the oldest states by age. Illinois and Iowa both have a higher average age. So if you're trying to avoid the retirees why would you stay in the midwest?

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/states-with-the-oldest-population.html
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/oldest-states


The point isn't to avoid retirees--but a net migration of downsizing retirees ups the costs and diminishes the supply for housing for singles/couples.


But the argument here is that most people don't stay where they went to college, so who cares? If OPs child has no interest in staying in AZ or IA then it matters not at all. These schools are similar in almost every regard so it comes down to a personal decision there is no right answer. OP asked for opinions and is getting them.


Schools have local networking opportunities though and your friends in these schools are often likely to stay in the rough area. I think it matters in the decision-making.


True which is why the vast majority of people here are saying AZ > IA. I haven't seen many Hawkeyes chiming in here about Iowa which seems telling.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For engineering or physics, definitely Arizona. For English and adjacent fields, definitely Iowa. For anything else, I think it's a location call (warm vs cold; small city vs college town; racially diverse vs pretty darn white). They're both solid, DCUM-underrated flagships.


It’s got a ton of diversity; very heavily Hispanic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DH and I are from the midwest and now live in AZ. Would never ever move back. U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking.


How do you know where OP's kid wants to live/work? For instance, I never want to live in the water-deprived SW again. And I love Tucson. It just seems so dead-end for the future in terms of climate. (Not sure I want to live in Iowa though either with the floods!). Chicago and other northern midwest cities are on the up-swing with climate change for the long term--and they also aren't going to be flooded with retirees like AZ--so I'd rather settle there if I were a young job-seeker. (Not saying that anyone should share my tastes--just saying that we don't know what OP's are).


Are you illiterate? I said it depends on where they want to live. Grew up in Chicago. It sucks and would never move back. This isn't about you it's about OP. You don't seem to know much about Chicago or AZ so I don't know why you're even in this conversation. If you did you would know it's not retirees flooding AZ.


I grew up in Chicago and lived in AZ.
You said " U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking." Your phrasing suggests you think they don't want to stay in the midwest and you think they want to stay in the SW.

And Arizona is the #2 net migration location for retirees after Florida according to the most recent US Census Bureau report.





Retirees aren't the only people on the move you know. Most people moving to AZ these days are from California.
https://azbigmedia.com/lifestyle/top-10-states-people-are-leaving-and-moving-to-arizona/

Millennials in particular are flocking to Phoenix. https://www.inmaricopa.com/phoenix-popular-city-millennials-moving-west-south/

The OP doesn't say where they live at all, I didn't assume they are even currently in the midwest. So if not even from the midwest why would they want to stay after graduation? Iowa is getting older and grayer, upwardly mobile young people tend to move out and never come back. Arizona is more attractive to long people for obvious reason as backed up by migration patterns as well. This doesn't seem to be a hard decision. Unless you live in Iowa and want in state tuition, but again, OP is short on the details.


Still, a 36000 net migration of retirees to AZ surpasses all their other generational migration.


Arizona isn't even in the top half of the oldest states by age. Illinois and Iowa both have a higher average age. So if you're trying to avoid the retirees why would you stay in the midwest?

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/states-with-the-oldest-population.html
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/oldest-states


The point isn't to avoid retirees--but a net migration of downsizing retirees ups the costs and diminishes the supply for housing for singles/couples.


But the argument here is that most people don't stay where they went to college, so who cares? If OPs child has no interest in staying in AZ or IA then it matters not at all. These schools are similar in almost every regard so it comes down to a personal decision there is no right answer. OP asked for opinions and is getting them.


Schools have local networking opportunities though and your friends in these schools are often likely to stay in the rough area. I think it matters in the decision-making.


True which is why the vast majority of people here are saying AZ > IA. I haven't seen many Hawkeyes chiming in here about Iowa which seems telling.


U of Iowa kids mainly end up working in Chicago. The survey posted earlier suggested that Iowa graduates were the same or slightly more satisfied with their career opportunities than U of AZ.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DH and I are from the midwest and now live in AZ. Would never ever move back. U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking.


How do you know where OP's kid wants to live/work? For instance, I never want to live in the water-deprived SW again. And I love Tucson. It just seems so dead-end for the future in terms of climate. (Not sure I want to live in Iowa though either with the floods!). Chicago and other northern midwest cities are on the up-swing with climate change for the long term--and they also aren't going to be flooded with retirees like AZ--so I'd rather settle there if I were a young job-seeker. (Not saying that anyone should share my tastes--just saying that we don't know what OP's are).


Are you illiterate? I said it depends on where they want to live. Grew up in Chicago. It sucks and would never move back. This isn't about you it's about OP. You don't seem to know much about Chicago or AZ so I don't know why you're even in this conversation. If you did you would know it's not retirees flooding AZ.


I grew up in Chicago and lived in AZ.
You said " U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking." Your phrasing suggests you think they don't want to stay in the midwest and you think they want to stay in the SW.

And Arizona is the #2 net migration location for retirees after Florida according to the most recent US Census Bureau report.





Retirees aren't the only people on the move you know. Most people moving to AZ these days are from California.
https://azbigmedia.com/lifestyle/top-10-states-people-are-leaving-and-moving-to-arizona/

Millennials in particular are flocking to Phoenix. https://www.inmaricopa.com/phoenix-popular-city-millennials-moving-west-south/

The OP doesn't say where they live at all, I didn't assume they are even currently in the midwest. So if not even from the midwest why would they want to stay after graduation? Iowa is getting older and grayer, upwardly mobile young people tend to move out and never come back. Arizona is more attractive to long people for obvious reason as backed up by migration patterns as well. This doesn't seem to be a hard decision. Unless you live in Iowa and want in state tuition, but again, OP is short on the details.


Still, a 36000 net migration of retirees to AZ surpasses all their other generational migration.


Arizona isn't even in the top half of the oldest states by age. Illinois and Iowa both have a higher average age. So if you're trying to avoid the retirees why would you stay in the midwest?

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/states-with-the-oldest-population.html
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/oldest-states


The point isn't to avoid retirees--but a net migration of downsizing retirees ups the costs and diminishes the supply for housing for singles/couples.


But the argument here is that most people don't stay where they went to college, so who cares? If OPs child has no interest in staying in AZ or IA then it matters not at all. These schools are similar in almost every regard so it comes down to a personal decision there is no right answer. OP asked for opinions and is getting them.


Schools have local networking opportunities though and your friends in these schools are often likely to stay in the rough area. I think it matters in the decision-making.


True which is why the vast majority of people here are saying AZ > IA. I haven't seen many Hawkeyes chiming in here about Iowa which seems telling.


U of Iowa kids mainly end up working in Chicago. The survey posted earlier suggested that Iowa graduates were the same or slightly more satisfied with their career opportunities than U of AZ.


And those grads are competing with UIUC, NU, Michigan, Wisconsin, Notre Dame and a whole host of other grads. Small fish in a big pond.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For engineering or physics, definitely Arizona. For English and adjacent fields, definitely Iowa. For anything else, I think it's a location call (warm vs cold; small city vs college town; racially diverse vs pretty darn white). They're both solid, DCUM-underrated flagships.

It’s got a ton of diversity; very heavily Hispanic.

Iowa City is less than 7% Hispanic. It's almost 80% white.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DH and I are from the midwest and now live in AZ. Would never ever move back. U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking.


How do you know where OP's kid wants to live/work? For instance, I never want to live in the water-deprived SW again. And I love Tucson. It just seems so dead-end for the future in terms of climate. (Not sure I want to live in Iowa though either with the floods!). Chicago and other northern midwest cities are on the up-swing with climate change for the long term--and they also aren't going to be flooded with retirees like AZ--so I'd rather settle there if I were a young job-seeker. (Not saying that anyone should share my tastes--just saying that we don't know what OP's are).


Are you illiterate? I said it depends on where they want to live. Grew up in Chicago. It sucks and would never move back. This isn't about you it's about OP. You don't seem to know much about Chicago or AZ so I don't know why you're even in this conversation. If you did you would know it's not retirees flooding AZ.


I grew up in Chicago and lived in AZ.
You said " U of A wins hands down. If the person doesn't want to stay in the midwest, why go to Iowa? If they want to stay in the SW Arizona has better networking." Your phrasing suggests you think they don't want to stay in the midwest and you think they want to stay in the SW.

And Arizona is the #2 net migration location for retirees after Florida according to the most recent US Census Bureau report.





Retirees aren't the only people on the move you know. Most people moving to AZ these days are from California.
https://azbigmedia.com/lifestyle/top-10-states-people-are-leaving-and-moving-to-arizona/

Millennials in particular are flocking to Phoenix. https://www.inmaricopa.com/phoenix-popular-city-millennials-moving-west-south/

The OP doesn't say where they live at all, I didn't assume they are even currently in the midwest. So if not even from the midwest why would they want to stay after graduation? Iowa is getting older and grayer, upwardly mobile young people tend to move out and never come back. Arizona is more attractive to long people for obvious reason as backed up by migration patterns as well. This doesn't seem to be a hard decision. Unless you live in Iowa and want in state tuition, but again, OP is short on the details.


Still, a 36000 net migration of retirees to AZ surpasses all their other generational migration.


Arizona isn't even in the top half of the oldest states by age. Illinois and Iowa both have a higher average age. So if you're trying to avoid the retirees why would you stay in the midwest?

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/states-with-the-oldest-population.html
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/oldest-states


The point isn't to avoid retirees--but a net migration of downsizing retirees ups the costs and diminishes the supply for housing for singles/couples.


But the argument here is that most people don't stay where they went to college, so who cares? If OPs child has no interest in staying in AZ or IA then it matters not at all. These schools are similar in almost every regard so it comes down to a personal decision there is no right answer. OP asked for opinions and is getting them.


Schools have local networking opportunities though and your friends in these schools are often likely to stay in the rough area. I think it matters in the decision-making.


True which is why the vast majority of people here are saying AZ > IA. I haven't seen many Hawkeyes chiming in here about Iowa which seems telling.


U of Iowa kids mainly end up working in Chicago. The survey posted earlier suggested that Iowa graduates were the same or slightly more satisfied with their career opportunities than U of AZ.


And those grads are competing with UIUC, NU, Michigan, Wisconsin, Notre Dame and a whole host of other grads. Small fish in a big pond.


And yet the data say that they fare as fine or better in careers than U of AZ grads.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
That is the only way for people to weigh in on academics since the reality is that neither of these schools are selective state schools. That is why folks are discussing the weather. Frankly, it makes no sense why OP is even choosing between these schools, after visiting most people would have a strong preference for one over the other. The is also a DC centric board. The is also a DC centric board. A lot of us would rather gouge our eyes out than live in either Iowa or AZ.


Seriously? i think going to a Big Ten university town in the Midwest or a funky desert city in the Southwest for four years would appeal precisely because they're each so very different from the same old same old mid-Atlantic scenery DCUM readers are so familiar with. Some DCUM readers are as parochial in their worldview as that old New Yorker cover of "a New Yorker's View of the World" -- civilization stops at Pittsburgh with little isolated colonies in Ann Arbor, Evanston, Hyde Park, the Bay Area, and Westwood.

And actually Iowa and Arizona are two universities that stand out for being relatively highly ranked for ed quality (certainly in the top half of nationwide flagships) relative to their (high) acceptance rates. Congratulations to OP for not being limited by the usual DCUM biases.


My East Coast kid went to Iowa, and then to Michigan for grad school, and now has great friends, a lovely girlfriend, and a job with benefits lined up that is also in the Midwest (but not Chicago) and would allow him to transfer back to the East Coast if he were so inclined. Which he isn't, at least not for now. He knew he wanted to get away with the extreme competitiveness of the DC area, and avoid the schools to which some of his classmates flocked, and hasn't once suggested that he regretted the decision.

"Iowa nice" is a real thing, and the fact that neither he nor anyone in his circle of Midwestern friends and co-workers would likely waste more than a minute's time arguing over Iowa compared to Arizona, at least not as if their lives depended on it, is just one of their redeeming qualities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
The OP doesn't say where they live at all, I didn't assume they are even currently in the midwest. So if not even from the midwest why would they want to stay after graduation? Iowa is getting older and grayer, upwardly mobile young people tend to move out and never come back. Arizona is more attractive to long people for obvious reason as backed up by migration patterns as well. This doesn't seem to be a hard decision. Unless you live in Iowa and want in state tuition, but again, OP is short on the details.


Many Americans go to college in places (like New Haven, or Durham, or Ann Arbor, or St Louis, or Rochester) that they have no intention of settling down in once their four years of undergrad are done. Why is this chain turning into a debate about the merits (or implications) of migrating in perpetuity to Arizona vs Iowa -- not the topic -- as opposed to the relative merits of attending these two (quite distinct) universities? One suspects that because DCUM readership doesn't know much specifically about either of these two schools, it's filling the void with assertions about where the weather is nicer and where they personally would prefer to live.


There's at least one, possibly a few more posters, in College and University Discussion threads who harp on how horrible the Midwest is, especially Ann Arbor. They never address the merits of Michigan, just the perceived demerits of Ann Arbor. They also hop on to any discussion in re Big Ten schools to denigrate them. One had the temerity to suggest that Notre Dame was an oasis compared to Big Ten schools as if South Bend were adjacent to Shangri La. Yes, it is cold in the Midwest in winter, but folks keep applying to these schools, even folks from out of state.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For engineering or physics, definitely Arizona. For English and adjacent fields, definitely Iowa. For anything else, I think it's a location call (warm vs cold; small city vs college town; racially diverse vs pretty darn white). They're both solid, DCUM-underrated flagships.

It’s got a ton of diversity; very heavily Hispanic.

Iowa City is less than 7% Hispanic. It's almost 80% white.


Yes, this was referencing U of A.
Anonymous
Sinema or Grassley? mmmm
Anonymous
Schools have local networking opportunities though and your friends in these schools are often likely to stay in the rough area. I think it matters in the decision-making.


Don't think the purported ability to engage in regional networking after graduating (something that's much less critical to postgraduate professional and social success than you seem to think) should be a prime consideration. Not least because at age 18 few people have an informed idea of where they might want to live after college. If one followed your guidance, people would basically either go to "T20" national-draw schools or -- the vast majority -- stick close to home to maximize their network (since they're likeliest to return to home after college). And avoid rural schools. And avoid "small-network" SLACs. All of which is kind of the exact opposite of the mind-expanding experience college is supposed to offer.

What's especially odd about this particular discussion is that even if one were to pick a college based on that dubious criterion, the choice of going to Iowa (and easily settling in Chicago afterward) or going to Arizona (and easily settling in Phoenix afterward) is hardly a clear-cut argument for the Arizona option, to be polite. (And before ideologues chime in to point out that Chicago's population is stagnant, its population of white-collar college graduates is growing -- there's never been a better time to be a young college grad in Chicago - and there are vastly more jobs in metro Chicago than in metro PHX).
Anonymous
True which is why the vast majority of people here are saying AZ > IA. I haven't seen many Hawkeyes chiming in here about Iowa which seems telling.


A small number of UA and Iowa alums/families have helpfully shared their (positive) experiences at each. And a bigger number here have offered "I don't know much about either school but I'd sure prefer living in Arizona to Iowa." That says less about either school -- let the OP beware -- than it does about DCUM commenters.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
That is the only way for people to weigh in on academics since the reality is that neither of these schools are selective state schools. That is why folks are discussing the weather. Frankly, it makes no sense why OP is even choosing between these schools, after visiting most people would have a strong preference for one over the other. The is also a DC centric board. The is also a DC centric board. A lot of us would rather gouge our eyes out than live in either Iowa or AZ.


Seriously? i think going to a Big Ten university town in the Midwest or a funky desert city in the Southwest for four years would appeal precisely because they're each so very different from the same old same old mid-Atlantic scenery DCUM readers are so familiar with. Some DCUM readers are as parochial in their worldview as that old New Yorker cover of "a New Yorker's View of the World" -- civilization stops at Pittsburgh with little isolated colonies in Ann Arbor, Evanston, Hyde Park, the Bay Area, and Westwood.

And actually Iowa and Arizona are two universities that stand out for being relatively highly ranked for ed quality (certainly in the top half of nationwide flagships) relative to their (high) acceptance rates. Congratulations to OP for not being limited by the usual DCUM biases.


My East Coast kid went to Iowa, and then to Michigan for grad school, and now has great friends, a lovely girlfriend, and a job with benefits lined up that is also in the Midwest (but not Chicago) and would allow him to transfer back to the East Coast if he were so inclined. Which he isn't, at least not for now. He knew he wanted to get away with the extreme competitiveness of the DC area, and avoid the schools to which some of his classmates flocked, and hasn't once suggested that he regretted the decision.

"Iowa nice" is a real thing, and the fact that neither he nor anyone in his circle of Midwestern friends and co-workers would likely waste more than a minute's time arguing over Iowa compared to Arizona, at least not as if their lives depended on it, is just one of their redeeming qualities.


DC chose a midwestern SLAC for a slew of reasons, including a break from the East coast mindset.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: