I guess you got a weird charge out of that
|
|
I honestly can't imagine why Duke would be falling out of favor, when it's right up the alley for so many applicants and the Research Triangle area has taken off economically. I could imagine a small number of elite East Coast types now writing off North Carolina because of the state's politics, but someone else would take their place quickly as economic activity moves to the south. So I think the trashing must come from folks who didn't get in or whose kids were turned down.
And, no, not a Duke graduate (in fact, turned it down twice). |
Duke had 50k applications last year |
| I would say Duke Georgetown and JHU |
| Georgetown 100%. |
+1 |
| What about GW? |
Plus 1 |
Not sure GW was ever popular…… |
A big problem for Hopkins is Baltimore overall. Crime has surged while people have fled--the population of Baltimore is like 100k less than in the 1990s. Hopkins even started offering graduates who stay in the city of Baltimore extra money and loan forgiveness. |
| Georgetown, although I don't understand why. My kid didn't have the stats but I was really surprised to see that Naviance showed really low application numbers from his MCPS HS for this year - about half of the number that applied last year. Most other schools show the opposite trend, much higher volume this year. All schools have their issues, but I can't understand how Northeastern could be "hot" and Georgetown is somehow not appealing. |
| Howard |
Interesting mention of GW. Surprisingly DS, FCPS 11th grader IS interested in GW as a potentialsafety. NOT full of FCPS kids, urban, merit etc. Also interested in Hopkins, Penn/Drexel, Columbia/NYU/Fordham. MIT/NEU, Pitt and CWRU. |
Georgetown uses a different process to accept transcripts and recommendation letters from the high schools. The data for this year might not be updated yet. |
You're confusing morality with personal beliefs and politics. Because I doubt most people in the states you sneer at think all these things. They just have different stances on policies and political issues than you do. You certainly don't have legitimate claims to a higher moral road based on what you said because you do reek of a self-imposed intolerance that you confuse for morality, and unfortunately you've also said enough to indicate a certain badly educated, narrow-minded, and willfully dogmatic outlook that has nothing to do with morality, but, frankly, is an attitude that is distinctly immoral rather than supportive of morals. |