You do know the colleges are only looking at a few people to fill the small amount of available freshman spaces on their roster? They aren't trawling the ocean |
100% correct. The play play downers will attack you for saying the truth. But talk is cheap right now. As soon as SY rosters ate defined for this fall they'll crawl back under their rock. Waiting for the next opportunity to play against younger players. |
You are correct - it is such a small number that a kid playing with a younger grade will literally never end up playing college soccer. Hence the reason that even to have a remote chance, you have to play with your grad year. |
The 10th grader with the skills, potential and attitude the college recruiter wants will get recruited if they are on a team with some 9th graders Because the college recruiter is a soccer person, not guidance counselor |
Why only play down in soccer? Just hold your Aug birthday back in school and they'll be aligned and everything works. Why would you want to be s square peg trying to fit in a round hole. |
Age guy is stuck on being an ass. He just wants special treatment and to be annoying for everyone else. If he really believed in rae and wasnt just using it as an excuse he'd apply it to everything in life including grade in school. Think about how good their grades would be if they could just be a couple of years older and have already taken that grade a few times. |
Why do my child a disservice by holding them back in school while kids their age are a year advanced academically and in maturity? Also, they can only play with their age group or up. So what's gained? No one can play down |
RAE says that being the oldest will give them an academic advantage over all the other students. Or ore you one of those selective RAE people that only uses it to get what you want? |
Wow, to brazenly flaunt ignorance and stupidity with such pride So, my kid being the oldest in 9th grade learning Economics 1 while kids her age are doing Economics 2/3 in 10th grade is a win for her? |
btw, RAE says earlier biological maturity gives advantages in certain situations, not just the calendar DOB You're welcome |
RAE says that oldest is always better. Its science. You just dont like it when you cant use RAE to get what you want. If I was a club owner I say sure your August birthday can play down a grade. You just need to hold them back. |
Oh so now "biological maturity" is somehow different than age according to the calender? Selective rae it is! You are such a phoney. |
Say you've never actually read a study on relative age effect without saying you've never actually read a study on relative age effect. Dear D Student, It's called RAE and not AE for a reason. For your homework, lookup biological age vs calendar age to start. For extra credit, lookup early maturation and early bloomers. * not a single RAE study says all older kids have an advantage or gets selected primarily |
At least you own your ignorance with pride Yes, that's exactly what it means. Biological Maturity is different than Chronological Maturity If they weren't different, you could tell every kid in a group by comparing their body to their month of birth and all of May kids would be bigger than all July kids. Oy vey |
I would think most studies don't speak in absolutes. Being the oldest in a cohort is a proven advantage. It's not really something to debate. Regardless, what everyone is talking about here are the pros and cons that apply to a very small number of kids. What those kids decide to do will be up to them and the clubs. I think what most will agree with, is that most clubs won't force kids to play up. If they want to, and it makes sense, etc., then they can. Otherwise, it is up to the parents and the player to decide what they want to do and to weigh the pros and cons (that have been talked about ad nauseum here) and make a decision. |