Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of felonies, the 39 who unmasked Flynn in the Obama administration should be charged with a crime

They went through the proper process and had absolute reason to request the unmasking. Nothing illegal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems that Samantha Powell was, ahem, less than truthful.

Requests for unmasking are legal and common and not at all synonymous with “leaking.”

She testified, before Congress, that she could not recall making any unmasking requests for Flynn. Yet, she did. 7 times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was not charged with perjury.

Flynn plead guilty to lying to the FBI about having discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador during the presidential transition. That is perjury.

No, it's not. Despite what Obama says.

Ok, so what are the charges that Flynn twice plead guilty to and affirmed under oath and before a judge?

Making false statements. That is a different charge than perjury. He was not under oath during the interview, thus, no perjury charge.

Like I said, Perjury:

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1260706619492429824

Different charge, genius. The perjury charge or contempt charge is for abandoning his plea.
Read, please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems that Samantha Powell was, ahem, less than truthful.

Requests for unmasking are legal and common and not at all synonymous with “leaking.”

She testified, before Congress, that she could not recall making any unmasking requests for Flynn. Yet, she did. 7 times.

That is not lying. If she didn't remember, she didn't remember. there was a lot going on at the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was not charged with perjury.

Flynn plead guilty to lying to the FBI about having discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador during the presidential transition. That is perjury.

No, it's not. Despite what Obama says.

Ok, so what are the charges that Flynn twice plead guilty to and affirmed under oath and before a judge?

Making false statements. That is a different charge than perjury. He was not under oath during the interview, thus, no perjury charge.

Like I said, Perjury:

Different charge, genius. The perjury charge or contempt charge is for abandoning his plea.
Read, please.

I was trying to give you a preview of coming events.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems that Samantha Powell was, ahem, less than truthful.

Requests for unmasking are legal and common and not at all synonymous with “leaking.”

She testified, before Congress, that she could not recall making any unmasking requests for Flynn. Yet, she did. 7 times.

That is not lying. If she didn't remember, she didn't remember. there was a lot going on at the time.

She couldn't remember? SEVEN TIMES????

She has about as good as a recollection as Hillary Clinton.

Sorry, doesn't pass the smell test.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was not charged with perjury.

Flynn plead guilty to lying to the FBI about having discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador during the presidential transition. That is perjury.

No, it's not. Despite what Obama says.

Ok, so what are the charges that Flynn twice plead guilty to and affirmed under oath and before a judge?

Making false statements. That is a different charge than perjury. He was not under oath during the interview, thus, no perjury charge.

Like I said, Perjury:

Different charge, genius. The perjury charge or contempt charge is for abandoning his plea.
Read, please.

I was trying to give you a preview of coming events.

No. Now you are trying to cover for your ignorance. And, your unending desire to always be right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of felonies, the 39 who unmasked Flynn in the Obama administration should be charged with a crime

They went through the proper process and had absolute reason to request the unmasking. Nothing illegal.

They are investigating to find out who leaked Flynn's name to the WaPo. This is just a step along the way....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems that Samantha Powell was, ahem, less than truthful.

Requests for unmasking are legal and common and not at all synonymous with “leaking.”

She testified, before Congress, that she could not recall making any unmasking requests for Flynn. Yet, she did. 7 times.

That is not lying. If she didn't remember, she didn't remember. there was a lot going on at the time.

She couldn't remember? SEVEN TIMES????

She has about as good as a recollection as Hillary Clinton.

Sorry, doesn't pass the smell test.

DP. For the unmasking requests, they don't say, Tell me who Flynn talked to. They say, Tell me who Foreign Person talked to. It happened to be Flynn a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems that Samantha Powell was, ahem, less than truthful.

Requests for unmasking are legal and common and not at all synonymous with “leaking.”

She testified, before Congress, that she could not recall making any unmasking requests for Flynn. Yet, she did. 7 times.

That is not lying. If she didn't remember, she didn't remember. there was a lot going on at the time.

She couldn't remember? SEVEN TIMES????

She has about as good as a recollection as Hillary Clinton.

Sorry, doesn't pass the smell test.

DP. For the unmasking requests, they don't say, Tell me who Flynn talked to. They say, Tell me who Foreign Person talked to. It happened to be Flynn a lot.

So? He was taking on the role of National Security Advisor. I would expect him to be talking to foreign people.

This still doesn't explain why Samantha Powell apparently lied.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems that Samantha Powell was, ahem, less than truthful.

Requests for unmasking are legal and common and not at all synonymous with “leaking.”

She testified, before Congress, that she could not recall making any unmasking requests for Flynn. Yet, she did. 7 times.

That is not lying. If she didn't remember, she didn't remember. there was a lot going on at the time.

She couldn't remember? SEVEN TIMES????

She has about as good as a recollection as Hillary Clinton.

Sorry, doesn't pass the smell test.

DP. For the unmasking requests, they don't say, Tell me who Flynn talked to. They say, Tell me who Foreign Person talked to. It happened to be Flynn a lot.

So? He was taking on the role of National Security Advisor. I would expect him to be talking to foreign people.

This still doesn't explain why Samantha Powell apparently lied.

Not then he wasn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems that Samantha Powell was, ahem, less than truthful.

Requests for unmasking are legal and common and not at all synonymous with “leaking.”

She testified, before Congress, that she could not recall making any unmasking requests for Flynn. Yet, she did. 7 times.

That is not lying. If she didn't remember, she didn't remember. there was a lot going on at the time.

She couldn't remember? SEVEN TIMES????

She has about as good as a recollection as Hillary Clinton.

Sorry, doesn't pass the smell test.

Again, when making this request, the requester does not know who the <unnamed american> is in the transcripts, hence the request to unmaks the name. Ergo, if asked seven times about Mr. Flynn, the proper answer is "I didn't know the identity of the person in the transcript" ergo didn't know it was Mr. Flynn specifically. That is the whole point of the process and hence why this wasn't a lie. In fact, it would have been problematic if the requester actually knew who the person was in advance.

[Anonymous]

Gleason is on the case. Ooooh, this is going to be great.

The man who brought down the Gambino family is brought out of retirement to do it again.

Is the right going to say Gleason is a partisan hack?

[Anonymous]

If I was Shea I would be seriously bummed about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gleason is on the case. Ooooh, this is going to be great.

The man who brought down the Gambino family is brought out of retirement to do it again.

Is the right going to say Gleason is a partisan hack?

Yep. They loved Judge Sullivan until they hated him. They'll probably hate Gleeson from the beginning.