Boycott/ Divest and Pull your College App from All States which violate Our Daughters' Civil Rights

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


And what will you do or say if red states begin offering much more comprehensive free birth control options, better prenatal care, better sex education that encourages girls to report cases of rape and incest so those instances reduce, birth rates and mother and infant mortality rates reduce, adoptions are easier and less expensive? What will you say when the red states have better overall healthcare for women rather than having a single issue with abortion as a form of birth control? Abortions are not risk free. Wouldn't preventing the pregnancy in the first place be better?


I would say that sounds like a blue state.

No kidding. No red state would support those policies because the alleged "pro-life" movement is (and has always been) about punishing and controlling women for having sex, NOT about actually caring about children.

I am sorry this is just not true.

I live in the south- you should see all the adopted kids from around the world in our church. Our whole community is geared around youth activities. We have very active charities, through our churches and otherwise.

Our local pediatric hospital will accept ANY insurance for kids. Try that in coastal cities and see what happens.

I am not going to convince you on this SC decision but you do yourself a disservice to dismiss pro life people (and the places where they live) as uncaring for children.

These people are effectively stealing kids from their own cultures and then brainwashing them with religion.

Disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interestingly, applications at southern schools are up—way up. I think a lot of kids were put off by the super woke cancel culture.

Rather than cut off all ties with the south, let’s try to figure out how we got here so we can then determine how to get things back on track.

Did your list include Virginia? The guy you elected already said he wants to take action, op. Or, are you only targeting “those Deep South” states dcum likes to criticize as backwards? I think your faux purple VA is just like the others on your list. So, shall we write off VA and aaaaaaalllllll those VA based corporations? Are you ready to bail on Amazon?

Not op, but I sure am.
Also, applications hardly reflect yesterday’s decision. And kids can continue to attend schools in these states - it’ll just be a lot more dangerous for the women. But, I support choice even if I disagree with the choice someone makes.

Literally 5% of the population lists abortion as their biggest issue that they’re voting on in the mid terms. This thread, and the posters on here, are way more focused on this issue than the majority of the population. This is becoming a boutique issue for upper middle class white women.

Voters are dumb AF. Wait until these draconian laws affect them personally.

The economy affects everyone. Abortion, not so much. Dems would have a better case if they weren’t aligning themselves with people who advocate for abortions up until birth for whatever reason given. In the age of high resolution ultrasounds that kind of stuff is not supported by more than 70 percent of the population and is banned in most countries and states because people think it is barbaric outside of exceptions for the the mother’s health. Dems need to stop aligning themselves with the far left fringe on social issues like this. It is not a winning model. Take Hillary’s advice and stick to “safe, legal, and rare” and don’t give any traction to the people who want to celebrate their abortions.

Red herring. 3rd trimester abortions are very rare and for very sad reasons.

Banning abortion will ultimately impact economy as well. You’ll drive more families into poverty. Decrease education rate. Increase crime rates. Etc.

We all lose.

Not a red herring. It is legal in states like New York to have an abortion up until birth for any reason. That is barbaric and most people in the country and around the world think so. It doesn’t matter that they’re very rare and done in very sad circumstances, it’s the fact that the law codifies that someone can abort a viable baby at 30 weeks if they felt like it for no reason that’s the issue.

If liberals would just stick to fighting for abortion in the first trimester and then abortion after that in special circumstances that are approved by a physician then you would have a lot more people on your side. When you start celebrating your abortions on IG and advocating for people’s rights to abort viable babies on a whim you lose a lot of people. Just stick to France’s abortions laws and stop advocating for barbarity to stick it to Trumpsters.

Let's pretend Elizabeth Smart - who was abducted and held by her captors for nearly a year - was found by police at 30 weeks pregnant with her rapist's baby.

Do you force her to go through birth?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


And what will you do or say if red states begin offering much more comprehensive free birth control options, better prenatal care, better sex education that encourages girls to report cases of rape and incest so those instances reduce, birth rates and mother and infant mortality rates reduce, adoptions are easier and less expensive? What will you say when the red states have better overall healthcare for women rather than having a single issue with abortion as a form of birth control? Abortions are not risk free. Wouldn't preventing the pregnancy in the first place be better?


I would say that sounds like a blue state.

No kidding. No red state would support those policies because the alleged "pro-life" movement is (and has always been) about punishing and controlling women for having sex, NOT about actually caring about children.

I am sorry this is just not true.

I live in the south- you should see all the adopted kids from around the world in our church. Our whole community is geared around youth activities. We have very active charities, through our churches and otherwise.

Our local pediatric hospital will accept ANY insurance for kids. Try that in coastal cities and see what happens.

I am not going to convince you on this SC decision but you do yourself a disservice to dismiss pro life people (and the places where they live) as uncaring for children.

These people are effectively stealing kids from their own cultures and then brainwashing them with religion.

Disgusting.

What an awful thing you have said about families making the maximum gift and commitment to kids who would grow up in 2nd and 3rd world orphanages, many with disabilities.

I hope nobody is discourage from adopting by someone like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apart from divesting our portfolio, purchasing, et cetera, we also have our lengthy travel bucket list, where we visit various cities, museums, shopping districts, landmarks, attractions like National Parks, regional food scene, et cetera around the country every year - Just updated, and reprioritized that list last night to sort it by state and color code it by how unfriendly each state is to women. We're taking our tourism dollars elsewhere - there are lots of fantastic choices outside of your repressive Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas etc.

Do you realize most people are not obsessed with politics in their every waking moment and do not plan investments and trips based on politics? You sound insufferable.

You sound clueless. You are not going to force people to give birth without a mother of a fight. Insufferable would be a mild description of the gravity if forcing births on people

Exactly.

You want to take away personal liberty from half the population and force millions of women to give birth against their will and think it’s no big deal?

GTFOH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


And what will you do or say if red states begin offering much more comprehensive free birth control options, better prenatal care, better sex education that encourages girls to report cases of rape and incest so those instances reduce, birth rates and mother and infant mortality rates reduce, adoptions are easier and less expensive? What will you say when the red states have better overall healthcare for women rather than having a single issue with abortion as a form of birth control? Abortions are not risk free. Wouldn't preventing the pregnancy in the first place be better?


I would say that sounds like a blue state.

No kidding. No red state would support those policies because the alleged "pro-life" movement is (and has always been) about punishing and controlling women for having sex, NOT about actually caring about children.

I am sorry this is just not true.

I live in the south- you should see all the adopted kids from around the world in our church. Our whole community is geared around youth activities. We have very active charities, through our churches and otherwise.

Our local pediatric hospital will accept ANY insurance for kids. Try that in coastal cities and see what happens.

I am not going to convince you on this SC decision but you do yourself a disservice to dismiss pro life people (and the places where they live) as uncaring for children.

These people are effectively stealing kids from their own cultures and then brainwashing them with religion.

Disgusting.

What an awful thing you have said about families making the maximum gift and commitment to kids who would grow up in 2nd and 3rd world orphanages, many with disabilities.

I hope nobody is discourage from adopting by someone like you.

Stealing people from other cultures and forcing your beliefs on them isn’t a “gift”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My daughter wants to be a Veternarian. She was accepted to Texas A&M, one of the premiere vet schools in the country. She is not dropping her choice of schools.

At least have her register to vote in texas and then VOTE!

She is a proud Republican voter. She will be sure to.

So she’s ok robbing women of their basic rights.

No wonder she couldn’t get into a better vet school.

You’re ignorant if you think Texas A&M isn’t one of the best vet schools in the country. Your statement also indicates you are not at all pro-choice. You want my daughter and others to make your choice not their own.

How ironic!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


And what will you do or say if red states begin offering much more comprehensive free birth control options, better prenatal care, better sex education that encourages girls to report cases of rape and incest so those instances reduce, birth rates and mother and infant mortality rates reduce, adoptions are easier and less expensive? What will you say when the red states have better overall healthcare for women rather than having a single issue with abortion as a form of birth control? Abortions are not risk free. Wouldn't preventing the pregnancy in the first place be better?


I would say that sounds like a blue state.

No kidding. No red state would support those policies because the alleged "pro-life" movement is (and has always been) about punishing and controlling women for having sex, NOT about actually caring about children.

I am sorry this is just not true.

I live in the south- you should see all the adopted kids from around the world in our church. Our whole community is geared around youth activities. We have very active charities, through our churches and otherwise.

Our local pediatric hospital will accept ANY insurance for kids. Try that in coastal cities and see what happens.

I am not going to convince you on this SC decision but you do yourself a disservice to dismiss pro life people (and the places where they live) as uncaring for children.

These people are effectively stealing kids from their own cultures and then brainwashing them with religion.

Disgusting.

What an awful thing you have said about families making the maximum gift and commitment to kids who would grow up in 2nd and 3rd world orphanages, many with disabilities.

I hope nobody is discourage from adopting by someone like you.

Stealing people from other cultures and forcing your beliefs on them isn’t a “gift”.

Tell that to the boy with Down’s syndrome from China in our Church. Or the kids my cousin adopted from Peru from an orphanage. God you are a bad bad person.

[Anonymous]

Culture is part of DNA?

What a sadly racialized view

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My daughter wants to be a Veternarian. She was accepted to Texas A&M, one of the premiere vet schools in the country. She is not dropping her choice of schools.

At least have her register to vote in texas and then VOTE!

She is a proud Republican voter. She will be sure to.

So she’s ok robbing women of their basic rights.

No wonder she couldn’t get into a better vet school.

You’re ignorant if you think Texas A&M isn’t one of the best vet schools in the country. Your statement also indicates you are not at all pro-choice. You want my daughter and others to make your choice not their own.

How ironic!

I didn’t say which school she should choose. Sounds like maybe she likes being told what she can and can’t do though. Hope she enjoys being a second class citizen.

And there are better vet schools in blue states.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


And what will you do or say if red states begin offering much more comprehensive free birth control options, better prenatal care, better sex education that encourages girls to report cases of rape and incest so those instances reduce, birth rates and mother and infant mortality rates reduce, adoptions are easier and less expensive? What will you say when the red states have better overall healthcare for women rather than having a single issue with abortion as a form of birth control? Abortions are not risk free. Wouldn't preventing the pregnancy in the first place be better?


I would say that sounds like a blue state.

No kidding. No red state would support those policies because the alleged "pro-life" movement is (and has always been) about punishing and controlling women for having sex, NOT about actually caring about children.

I am sorry this is just not true.

I live in the south- you should see all the adopted kids from around the world in our church. Our whole community is geared around youth activities. We have very active charities, through our churches and otherwise.

Our local pediatric hospital will accept ANY insurance for kids. Try that in coastal cities and see what happens.

I am not going to convince you on this SC decision but you do yourself a disservice to dismiss pro life people (and the places where they live) as uncaring for children.

These people are effectively stealing kids from their own cultures and then brainwashing them with religion.

Disgusting.

What an awful thing you have said about families making the maximum gift and commitment to kids who would grow up in 2nd and 3rd world orphanages, many with disabilities.

I hope nobody is discourage from adopting by someone like you.

Stealing people from other cultures and forcing your beliefs on them isn’t a “gift”.

Tell that to the boy with Down’s syndrome from China in our Church. Or the kids my cousin adopted from Peru from an orphanage. God you are a bad bad person.

Just because they are vulnerable doesn’t mean it’s ok to take them from their country of origin. Or brainwash them with your own religion.

I have extended family members adopted from other countries. As adults, they feel robbed of their identity. And have rejected the religion forced on them by their adoptive parents. They don’t consider it a “gift” at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Culture is part of DNA?

What a sadly racialized view

You don’t think adoptees have a connection to their family/country of origin?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


And what will you do or say if red states begin offering much more comprehensive free birth control options, better prenatal care, better sex education that encourages girls to report cases of rape and incest so those instances reduce, birth rates and mother and infant mortality rates reduce, adoptions are easier and less expensive? What will you say when the red states have better overall healthcare for women rather than having a single issue with abortion as a form of birth control? Abortions are not risk free. Wouldn't preventing the pregnancy in the first place be better?


I would say that sounds like a blue state.

No kidding. No red state would support those policies because the alleged "pro-life" movement is (and has always been) about punishing and controlling women for having sex, NOT about actually caring about children.

I am sorry this is just not true.

I live in the south- you should see all the adopted kids from around the world in our church. Our whole community is geared around youth activities. We have very active charities, through our churches and otherwise.

Our local pediatric hospital will accept ANY insurance for kids. Try that in coastal cities and see what happens.

I am not going to convince you on this SC decision but you do yourself a disservice to dismiss pro life people (and the places where they live) as uncaring for children.

These people are effectively stealing kids from their own cultures and then brainwashing them with religion.

Disgusting.

What an awful thing you have said about families making the maximum gift and commitment to kids who would grow up in 2nd and 3rd world orphanages, many with disabilities.

I hope nobody is discourage from adopting by someone like you.

Stealing people from other cultures and forcing your beliefs on them isn’t a “gift”.

Tell that to the boy with Down’s syndrome from China in our Church. Or the kids my cousin adopted from Peru from an orphanage. God you are a bad bad person.

Just because they are vulnerable doesn’t mean it’s ok to take them from their country of origin. Or brainwash them with your own religion.

I have extended family members adopted from other countries. As adults, they feel robbed of their identity. And have rejected the religion forced on them by their adoptive parents. They don’t consider it a “gift” at all.

You are doing a terrible thing with your trolling. A sad and terrible thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When will people understand that it isn't about abortion. It is about autonomy. It is about the right of a woman to control her body. Banning abortions is not about abortion, it is about controlling women. I wouldn't get one ever, if my daughter wanted one, I would take her but I would be sad about it. How I feel about abortion or how I feel about anything shouldn't take precedence over another human being's autonomy in a civilized society.

Do you not get the pro-life position at all? They think it’s murder. You can’t tell someone who believes abortion is murder that they should be pro-choice about it. Your focus should be on explaining your views as to why you believe it’s not murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


And what will you do or say if red states begin offering much more comprehensive free birth control options, better prenatal care, better sex education that encourages girls to report cases of rape and incest so those instances reduce, birth rates and mother and infant mortality rates reduce, adoptions are easier and less expensive? What will you say when the red states have better overall healthcare for women rather than having a single issue with abortion as a form of birth control? Abortions are not risk free. Wouldn't preventing the pregnancy in the first place be better?


I would say that sounds like a blue state.

No kidding. No red state would support those policies because the alleged "pro-life" movement is (and has always been) about punishing and controlling women for having sex, NOT about actually caring about children.

I am sorry this is just not true.

I live in the south- you should see all the adopted kids from around the world in our church. Our whole community is geared around youth activities. We have very active charities, through our churches and otherwise.

Our local pediatric hospital will accept ANY insurance for kids. Try that in coastal cities and see what happens.

I am not going to convince you on this SC decision but you do yourself a disservice to dismiss pro life people (and the places where they live) as uncaring for children.

These people are effectively stealing kids from their own cultures and then brainwashing them with religion.

Disgusting.

What an awful thing you have said about families making the maximum gift and commitment to kids who would grow up in 2nd and 3rd world orphanages, many with disabilities.

I hope nobody is discourage from adopting by someone like you.

Stealing people from other cultures and forcing your beliefs on them isn’t a “gift”.

Tell that to the boy with Down’s syndrome from China in our Church. Or the kids my cousin adopted from Peru from an orphanage. God you are a bad bad person.

Just because they are vulnerable doesn’t mean it’s ok to take them from their country of origin. Or brainwash them with your own religion.

I have extended family members adopted from other countries. As adults, they feel robbed of their identity. And have rejected the religion forced on them by their adoptive parents. They don’t consider it a “gift” at all.

DP. Your whole family sounds as rigid and uncaring as you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My daughter wants to be a Veternarian. She was accepted to Texas A&M, one of the premiere vet schools in the country. She is not dropping her choice of schools.

At least have her register to vote in texas and then VOTE!

She is a proud Republican voter. She will be sure to.

So she’s ok robbing women of their basic rights.

No wonder she couldn’t get into a better vet school.

You’re ignorant if you think Texas A&M isn’t one of the best vet schools in the country. Your statement also indicates you are not at all pro-choice. You want my daughter and others to make your choice not their own.

How ironic!

I didn’t say which school she should choose. Sounds like maybe she likes being told what she can and can’t do though. Hope she enjoys being a second class citizen.

And there are better vet schools in blue states.

Name them if you are so wise.

Lots of parents here are telling their kids where they can choose schools or where they will pay. You pro murder people just cannot fathom there are women who are pro life who make a choice where they will go to school. Your delusional if you think any state is making women second class citizens.