|
That Key lady who wants to “save” money by not building any underground parking for teachers and staff that the CC HS site? Gee, wonder what she wants to “save” the money for. Let me guess, for keeping Key on Key.
Guess what? If they don’t spend it on parking, I will work every day to make sure they spend that money on this particular project in other ways. No way is yet another South Arlington project getting the shaft to make your North Arlington life more convenient. |
| She also has a garage. So, maybe her street isn’t zoned, but random people aren’t trying to park there (it’s not near anything of note) and she has a GARAGE. |
Wow. You know a lot about Key Lady. I'm a McK mom and can't figure out who McKrazy is...I guess I don't gossip enough. |
+1 EVERY new school should have an accessible playground. IMO, kids with physical disabilities who are zoned to schools with inaccessible playgrounds should be allowed to transfer to schools that are accessible and get school transportation to go there. It's awful that a child could spend their entire K-5 years unable to go on a playground. |
Stick around. You’ll witness a whole lot of doxxing on DCUM. |
at a Title 1 school but am middle class. Child was offered after school small group tutoring to make up for areas where they are behind.. and it comes with the bus option. I am thrilled! Not for me but for the rest of the kids. it removes a barrier from participation. Now, why this is not done IN school, IDK. |
Well, when you put it that way it makes me feel guilty for even making the joke. |
Meh. No one actually “outed” anyone. |
McKrazy's identity isn't a secret, she (a) acts crazy in public and (b) outed herself willingly on AEM |
| If anyone recalls the short-lived Reed school tree hullabaloo, taking a couple of the mature trees down was necessary to keep the path around the playground at a grade that met universal design principles. I was glad APS stuck to their guns on that one. |
Willingly and proudly. So weird. |
|
+1 EVERY new school should have an accessible playground. IMO, kids with physical disabilities who are zoned to schools with inaccessible playgrounds should be allowed to transfer to schools that are accessible and get school transportation to go there. It's awful that a child could spend their entire K-5 years unable to go on a playground.
I totally agree I am just wondering how many there are with our very compact land and many old building sites with school layout that are essentially the same as when built in the 1950’s. The school it’s self may be assessable but the on site playgrounds at nearly ever elementary school I’ve seen are mulch based. So is the blacktop area (when not being used to house trailers) assessable playground compliant? Also I believe special education transfers happen frequently. The % granted when asked for by parents I have no idea but at my ES I have seen a large number of students come from other schools. |
I totally agree I am just wondering how many there are with our very compact land and many old building sites with school layout that are essentially the same as when built in the 1950’s. The school it’s self may be assessable but the on site playgrounds at nearly ever elementary school I’ve seen are mulch based. So is the blacktop area (when not being used to house trailers) assessable playground compliant? Also I believe special education transfers happen frequently. The % granted when asked for by parents I have no idea but at my ES I have seen a large number of students come from other schools. Counterpoint: I think this is false. I know many families who requested moves an it took years, and in some cases legal action, for moves to happen. |
|
So what is the “opportunity hoarding” that the teacher sees at Key?
With the 50/50 model does that mean that affluent, Spanish-speaking kids are hoarding opportunities from lower-income, Spanish speaking kids? I’m not following her logic. |
That is because she doesn’t use logic. |