VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

I love how they feign ignorance about the many clown GOP candidates.

Porn? At least it's legal. Your people are criminals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Suburban Richmond.......

A Virginia Democratic candidate running for the commonwealth’s House of Delegates is being accused of performing sex acts with her husband in front of an online audience and encouraging viewers to send them "tip" money.

Nurse practitioner Susanna Gibson, who is running in a competitive race in suburban Richmond for the House of Delegates in the 57th district, reportedly used a platform called Chaturbate to stream sex acts with her husband.

Gibson, a 40-year-old mother of two, is said to have posted more than a dozen videos that were archived on a site called Recurbate in September 2022, which is after she officially entered the race, and the most recent videos were archived on Sept. 30, 2022, The Washington Post reported Monday.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/virginia-democrat-candidate-posted-sex-acts-husband-online-soliciting-tips-report

How old are her two children?

[Anonymous]

I feel sorry for her kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

They are real people who deserve the same rights as others. You don’t care if they lose their lives and liberty.

Yes, you have just as much right to your body as I do to mine. Does that include vaccines or is it "That's different!"?

No one physically forced you to get a vaccine. You wouldn't be charged with a crime if you didn't get one. F off.

Yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

I love how they feign ignorance about the many clown GOP candidates.

Porn? At least it's legal. Your people are criminals.

But what about...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

I love how they feign ignorance about the many clown GOP candidates.

Porn? At least it's legal. Your people are criminals.

But what about...

But what? What did FoxNews tell you to think?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

They are real people who deserve the same rights as others. You don’t care if they lose their lives and liberty.

Yes, you have just as much right to your body as I do to mine. Does that include vaccines or is it "That's different!"?

No one physically forced you to get a vaccine. You wouldn't be charged with a crime if you didn't get one. F off.

Yet.

Such hysterics. Grow TF up.

Women are real people who deserve the same rights as others. Life, liberty, and happiness for starters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it illegal? No. It is weird? Yes.

Prostitution is illegal here are some quotes it eludes to campaign fund raising

Gibson tells her husband: 'Ill let you f*** me in the a** doggy style in a private room if someone wants to pay. That's the deal.'

At another point she says: 'Y'all can watch me pee if you tip me and some tokens, again I'm raising money for a good cause.'

At another, Gibson explains she is in an open relationship with her husband even though he 'doesn't like sharing.'

Her husband, attorney John David Gibson, then says: 'Sometimes I have to though. She makes me.'

'I've had three in a day actually,' she says at another point. 'Don't tell my husband he was the third.'

'I’m married and I think the person I’m married to is amazing. But I love sex. I always have I always will. I don’t think that when you are in love with someone it means that you don’t want to f*** other people. Like love and sex are not mutually exclusive right,' Gibson explains of her marriage.

In many of the videos, Gibson urges viewers to provider her tips in the form of 'tokens' and promises to take viewers into a private online room for the right price.

'Y'all I need more tips ... They want anal and missionary but I'm only doing it if they're in a private room.'

'Racking up one token left and right, any more? I'm raising money for a really good cause,' she says at one point. It's unclear if she meant she was raising money for her campaign.

I’m speechless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for her kids.

But you don't have any concern about Boebert's kids? Or the kids who were in the movie theater where she was giving some random dude a handjob?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for her kids.

I feel sorry for her kids. And the millions of women living in VA who are at risk of the Republicans taking away their rights.

[Anonymous]

I feel sorry for every child with immoral parents. What kind of country are you leaving to the children? Anything they can be proud of?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

What's amazing is that you're blatantly lying and expecting people will believe you. We all know that while Boebert behaved obnoxiously and inappropriately, she didn't give anyone a hand job. She was also fully clothed. It's frankly hilarious that you're trying to equate her bad behavior in public to a candidate ACTUALLY PERFORMING PORN ONLINE FOR PAYMENT. No wonder no one takes you people seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

I love how they feign ignorance about the many clown GOP candidates.

Porn? At least it's legal. Your people are criminals.

But what about...

Exactly. And the two situations are not even remotely similar. Such grasping by desperate Dems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

I love how they feign ignorance about the many clown GOP candidates.

Porn? At least it's legal. Your people are criminals.

But what about...

But what? What did FoxNews tell you to think?

Whataboutism isn't an argument. We are talking about Gibbons, not Boebert.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

They are real people who deserve the same rights as others. You don’t care if they lose their lives and liberty.

Yes, you have just as much right to your body as I do to mine. Does that include vaccines or is it "That's different!"?

No one physically forced you to get a vaccine. You wouldn't be charged with a crime if you didn't get one. F off.

Yet.

Such hysterics. Grow TF up.

Women are real people who deserve the same rights as others. Life, liberty, and happiness for starters.

You don't have unlimited personal rights.