VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it illegal? No. It is weird? Yes.

Prostitution is illegal here are some quotes it eludes to campaign fund raising

Gibson tells her husband: 'Ill let you f*** me in the a** doggy style in a private room if someone wants to pay. That's the deal.'

At another point she says: 'Y'all can watch me pee if you tip me and some tokens, again I'm raising money for a good cause.'

At another, Gibson explains she is in an open relationship with her husband even though he 'doesn't like sharing.'

Her husband, attorney John David Gibson, then says: 'Sometimes I have to though. She makes me.'

'I've had three in a day actually,' she says at another point. 'Don't tell my husband he was the third.'

'I’m married and I think the person I’m married to is amazing. But I love sex. I always have I always will. I don’t think that when you are in love with someone it means that you don’t want to f*** other people. Like love and sex are not mutually exclusive right,' Gibson explains of her marriage.

In many of the videos, Gibson urges viewers to provider her tips in the form of 'tokens' and promises to take viewers into a private online room for the right price.

'Y'all I need more tips ... They want anal and missionary but I'm only doing it if they're in a private room.'

'Racking up one token left and right, any more? I'm raising money for a really good cause,' she says at one point. It's unclear if she meant she was raising money for her campaign.

I’m speechless.

+1
She is utter and complete trash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

They are real people who deserve the same rights as others. You don’t care if they lose their lives and liberty.

Yes, you have just as much right to your body as I do to mine. Does that include vaccines or is it "That's different!"?

No one physically forced you to get a vaccine. You wouldn't be charged with a crime if you didn't get one. F off.

Yet.

Such hysterics. Grow TF up.

Women are real people who deserve the same rights as others. Life, liberty, and happiness for starters.

You don't have unlimited personal rights.

I have the right to control my own body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for her kids.

But you don't have any concern about Boebert's kids? Or the kids who were in the movie theater where she was giving some random dude a handjob?

It is absolutely hilarious that you are seriously trying to equate these two situations. Fully clothed woman acting obnoxious in theater vs woman performing explicit porn acts - for money. You sure are desperate to distract!
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

I love how they feign ignorance about the many clown GOP candidates.

Porn? At least it's legal. Your people are criminals.

But what about...

But what? What did FoxNews tell you to think?

Whataboutism isn't an argument. We are talking about Gibbons, not Boebert.

The comment was about the Republican criminals. At least porn isn’t illegal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

What's amazing is that you're blatantly lying and expecting people will believe you. We all know that while Boebert behaved obnoxiously and inappropriately, she didn't give anyone a hand job. She was also fully clothed. It's frankly hilarious that you're trying to equate her bad behavior in public to a candidate ACTUALLY PERFORMING PORN ONLINE FOR PAYMENT. No wonder no one takes you people seriously.

THIS ^^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

I love how they feign ignorance about the many clown GOP candidates.

Porn? At least it's legal. Your people are criminals.

But what about...

But what? What did FoxNews tell you to think?

Whataboutism isn't an argument. We are talking about Gibbons, not Boebert.

The comment was about the Republican criminals. At least porn isn’t illegal.

DP. You are a sad, pathetic person if that’s all you’ve got. Democrats deserve their porn candidate. So, so disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for her kids.

But you don't have any concern about Boebert's kids? Or the kids who were in the movie theater where she was giving some random dude a handjob?

It is absolutely hilarious that you are seriously trying to equate these two situations. Fully clothed woman acting obnoxious in theater vs woman performing explicit porn acts - for money. You sure are desperate to distract!
DP

In person in public vs a private online room.

Yes, there is no comparison that fondling people in public is worse than private online activities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

I love how they feign ignorance about the many clown GOP candidates.

Porn? At least it's legal. Your people are criminals.

But what about...

But what? What did FoxNews tell you to think?

Whataboutism isn't an argument. We are talking about Gibbons, not Boebert.

The comment was about the Republican criminals. At least porn isn’t illegal.

DP. You are a sad, pathetic person if that’s all you’ve got. Democrats deserve their porn candidate. So, so disgusting.

And yet, so much better than R candidates. Guess you’re ok with misogynists, criminals, and traitors. That tracks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In what kind of society would a nurse practitioner need to do this? Sad.

News Flash:
She and her Democrat lawyer spouse wanted to do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for her kids.

But you don't have any concern about Boebert's kids? Or the kids who were in the movie theater where she was giving some random dude a handjob?

It is absolutely hilarious that you are seriously trying to equate these two situations. Fully clothed woman acting obnoxious in theater vs woman performing explicit porn acts - for money. You sure are desperate to distract!
DP

In person in public vs a private online room.

Yes, there is no comparison that fondling people in public is worse than private online activities.

I am not sure you understand the words you are using.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

They are real people who deserve the same rights as others. You don’t care if they lose their lives and liberty.

Yes, you have just as much right to your body as I do to mine. Does that include vaccines or is it "That's different!"?

No one physically forced you to get a vaccine. You wouldn't be charged with a crime if you didn't get one. F off.

Yet.

Such hysterics. Grow TF up.

Women are real people who deserve the same rights as others. Life, liberty, and happiness for starters.

You don't have unlimited personal rights.

I have the right to control my own body.

No, you don't. The law has clearly established that in numerous ways.

[Anonymous]

Not sure why people are equating the two. One is in the US House of Representatives. And the other is where exactly?

Not going to bother googling it.

But get the feeling this is just a rando and not the governor.

What bothers me more about Boebert is the vaping. That is so rude and low class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

They are real people who deserve the same rights as others. You don’t care if they lose their lives and liberty.

Yes, you have just as much right to your body as I do to mine. Does that include vaccines or is it "That's different!"?

No one physically forced you to get a vaccine. You wouldn't be charged with a crime if you didn't get one. F off.

Yet.

Such hysterics. Grow TF up.

Women are real people who deserve the same rights as others. Life, liberty, and happiness for starters.

You don't have unlimited personal rights.

I have the right to control my own body.

No, you don't. The law has clearly established that in numerous ways.

The law violates my personal rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for her kids.

But you don't have any concern about Boebert's kids? Or the kids who were in the movie theater where she was giving some random dude a handjob?

It is absolutely hilarious that you are seriously trying to equate these two situations. Fully clothed woman acting obnoxious in theater vs woman performing explicit porn acts - for money. You sure are desperate to distract!
DP

In person in public vs a private online room.

Yes, there is no comparison that fondling people in public is worse than private online activities.

I am not sure you understand the words you are using.

I’ll spell it out for you since you seem a little slow. One person was physically in a public place with children present. People there didn’t consent to see them fondling each other.

The other was online in a private group of consenting adults.

Republicans struggle with the concept of consent. You think you can do whatever you want to others without their consent.

[Anonymous]

Is she out campaigning or not?