VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

I mean, she’s a prostitute. But if you’re ok with that, fine. I wouldn’t vote for her… nothing to do with religion, don’t care for it. Scummy people are scummy people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The real issue is that this is a person who is comfortable with lying. In order to get your party's nomination, as well as endorsements from the teacher's association, unions, etc. you get interviewed and "Is there anything embarassing online that might come back to haunt us?" is a pretty standard question. She would have been asked that question and it's pretty clear she lied. What else is she lying about and how comfortable is she with lying? In my humble opinion, we have enough liars already in Congress and we don't need more.

Intimately involved in many endorsements and we literally never ask this question. We vet the same way we do oppo research. Very unlikely she lied as you are imagining.

But OP saw that in House of Cards!!! Do you mean that show isn't accurate of the real political world?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, she’s a prostitute. But if you’re ok with that, fine. I wouldn’t vote for her… nothing to do with religion, don’t care for it. Scummy people are scummy people.

she's a prostitute because she... had sex with her husband? Does that make me a prostitute?

[Anonymous]

Type A personality

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

Oh, Democrats. Never change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, she’s a prostitute. But if you’re ok with that, fine. I wouldn’t vote for her… nothing to do with religion, don’t care for it. Scummy people are scummy people.

she's a prostitute because she... had sex with her husband? Does that make me a prostitute?

She’s being compensated to perform sex acts for others. Yes, she is a prostitute. But you do you. Ok?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, she’s a prostitute. But if you’re ok with that, fine. I wouldn’t vote for her… nothing to do with religion, don’t care for it. Scummy people are scummy people.

she's a prostitute because she... had sex with her husband? Does that make me a prostitute?

She’s being compensated to perform sex acts for others. Yes, she is a prostitute. But you do you. Ok?

If you have evidence that her... husband... was paying her for sex, I suggest you send that over to the police. otherwise, I suggest you stfu.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, she’s a prostitute. But if you’re ok with that, fine. I wouldn’t vote for her… nothing to do with religion, don’t care for it. Scummy people are scummy people.

she's a prostitute because she... had sex with her husband? Does that make me a prostitute?

She’s being compensated to perform sex acts for others. Yes, she is a prostitute. But you do you. Ok?

If you have evidence that her... husband... was paying her for sex, I suggest you send that over to the police. otherwise, I suggest you stfu.

Like I said, you do you. Defend her business practices all you want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ahh love the concern trolling from Republicans on this.

"Concern trolling"? I think this is absolutely hilarious and totally exemplifies the liberal mindset, as others have said. This woman probably reads aloud from Gender Queer to her two children at bedtime. That is, if she's not busy filming with her husband.

I mean, do dumb Democrats even hear yourselves, crowing about how "cool" she is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, she’s a prostitute. But if you’re ok with that, fine. I wouldn’t vote for her… nothing to do with religion, don’t care for it. Scummy people are scummy people.

she's a prostitute because she... had sex with her husband? Does that make me a prostitute?

Um... she's getting paid for it? Whoooooooooosh...

[Anonymous]

i don't believe until I see the videos myself

[Anonymous]

I’m still not voting for her

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, she’s a prostitute. But if you’re ok with that, fine. I wouldn’t vote for her… nothing to do with religion, don’t care for it. Scummy people are scummy people.

she's a prostitute because she... had sex with her husband? Does that make me a prostitute?

Um... she's getting paid for it? Whoooooooooosh...

Her husband is paying her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it illegal? No. It is weird? Yes.

Prostitution is illegal here are some quotes it eludes to campaign fund raising

Gibson tells her husband: 'Ill let you f*** me in the a** doggy style in a private room if someone wants to pay. That's the deal.'

At another point she says: 'Y'all can watch me pee if you tip me and some tokens, again I'm raising money for a good cause.'

At another, Gibson explains she is in an open relationship with her husband even though he 'doesn't like sharing.'

Her husband, attorney John David Gibson, then says: 'Sometimes I have to though. She makes me.'

'I've had three in a day actually,' she says at another point. 'Don't tell my husband he was the third.'

'I’m married and I think the person I’m married to is amazing. But I love sex. I always have I always will. I don’t think that when you are in love with someone it means that you don’t want to f*** other people. Like love and sex are not mutually exclusive right,' Gibson explains of her marriage.

In many of the videos, Gibson urges viewers to provider her tips in the form of 'tokens' and promises to take viewers into a private online room for the right price.

'Y'all I need more tips ... They want anal and missionary but I'm only doing it if they're in a private room.'

'Racking up one token left and right, any more? I'm raising money for a really good cause,' she says at one point. It's unclear if she meant she was raising money for her campaign.

As long as she’s against Youngkin and the rethuglicans, I’m totally supportive of this. Of everything I read. Good for her. Sending her some $$$ tomorrow.


We need lots more politicians like her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it illegal? No. It is weird? Yes.

Prostitution is illegal here are some quotes it eludes to campaign fund raising

Gibson tells her husband: 'Ill let you f*** me in the a** doggy style in a private room if someone wants to pay. That's the deal.'

At another point she says: 'Y'all can watch me pee if you tip me and some tokens, again I'm raising money for a good cause.'

At another, Gibson explains she is in an open relationship with her husband even though he 'doesn't like sharing.'

Her husband, attorney John David Gibson, then says: 'Sometimes I have to though. She makes me.'

'I've had three in a day actually,' she says at another point. 'Don't tell my husband he was the third.'

'I’m married and I think the person I’m married to is amazing. But I love sex. I always have I always will. I don’t think that when you are in love with someone it means that you don’t want to f*** other people. Like love and sex are not mutually exclusive right,' Gibson explains of her marriage.

In many of the videos, Gibson urges viewers to provider her tips in the form of 'tokens' and promises to take viewers into a private online room for the right price.

'Y'all I need more tips ... They want anal and missionary but I'm only doing it if they're in a private room.'

'Racking up one token left and right, any more? I'm raising money for a really good cause,' she says at one point. It's unclear if she meant she was raising money for her campaign.

As long as she’s against Youngkin and the rethuglicans, I’m totally supportive of this. Of everything I read. Good for her. Sending her some $$$ tomorrow.


We need lots more politicians like her.

Yup. She's a model citizen. As she said, three in a day, with her husband last, maybe she can top it during the campaign season.

Send more tokens!