VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

Wait I thought we weren’t supposed to be single issue voters? I can’t keep up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

Yeah she doesn't seem like the *ideal* candidate but she's better than any Republican

This actually made me laugh. Imagine if this was a Republican candidate doing pay-for-porn. OMG, you people would be in absolute hysterics about it and calling her all kinds of misogynist names, as you do when a conservative woman even looks at you the wrong way. It’s actually hilarious to think about your reaction… not an “ideal” candidate! Understatement of the century.

LOL, no. Most Rs candidates are clowns. It wouldn’t be shocking at all if one did porn. It’d be shocking if they weren’t a criminal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

They are real people who deserve the same rights as others. You don’t care if they lose their lives and liberty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

Wait I thought we weren’t supposed to be single issue voters? I can’t keep up

That was back before extremists took over the SCOTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

Yeah she doesn't seem like the *ideal* candidate but she's better than any Republican

This actually made me laugh. Imagine if this was a Republican candidate doing pay-for-porn. OMG, you people would be in absolute hysterics about it and calling her all kinds of misogynist names, as you do when a conservative woman even looks at you the wrong way. It’s actually hilarious to think about your reaction… not an “ideal” candidate! Understatement of the century.

LOL, no. Most Rs candidates are clowns. It wouldn’t be shocking at all if one did porn. It’d be shocking if they weren’t a criminal.

Hit a nerve? IF any Republicans did porn, they would definitely not be stupid enough to do it without wearing a mask of some sort. I mean, that's over and above standard stupidity. At any rate, she's your candidate and we are laughing at you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

Wait I thought we weren’t supposed to be single issue voters? I can’t keep up

That was back before extremists took over the SCOTUS.

And by "extremists," you mean people you disagree with. Noted.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

Wait I thought we weren’t supposed to be single issue voters? I can’t keep up

That was back before extremists took over the SCOTUS.

And by "extremists," you mean people you disagree with. Noted.
DP

Corrupt people who lie and cheat to force their extremist religious beliefs on the majority, against the will of the people.

They think they can control women’s bodies without their consent. It’s disgusting and extremist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

Yeah she doesn't seem like the *ideal* candidate but she's better than any Republican

This actually made me laugh. Imagine if this was a Republican candidate doing pay-for-porn. OMG, you people would be in absolute hysterics about it and calling her all kinds of misogynist names, as you do when a conservative woman even looks at you the wrong way. It’s actually hilarious to think about your reaction… not an “ideal” candidate! Understatement of the century.

LOL, no. Most Rs candidates are clowns. It wouldn’t be shocking at all if one did porn. It’d be shocking if they weren’t a criminal.

Hit a nerve? IF any Republicans did porn, they would definitely not be stupid enough to do it without wearing a mask of some sort. I mean, that's over and above standard stupidity. At any rate, she's your candidate and we are laughing at you.

Go ahead and laugh. She’s still better than the POS you have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

Yeah she doesn't seem like the *ideal* candidate but she's better than any Republican

This actually made me laugh. Imagine if this was a Republican candidate doing pay-for-porn. OMG, you people would be in absolute hysterics about it and calling her all kinds of misogynist names, as you do when a conservative woman even looks at you the wrong way. It’s actually hilarious to think about your reaction… not an “ideal” candidate! Understatement of the century.

LOL, no. Most Rs candidates are clowns. It wouldn’t be shocking at all if one did porn. It’d be shocking if they weren’t a criminal.

Hit a nerve? IF any Republicans did porn, they would definitely not be stupid enough to do it without wearing a mask of some sort. I mean, that's over and above standard stupidity. At any rate, she's your candidate and we are laughing at you.

Go ahead and laugh. She’s still better than the POS you have.

And I know you really believe that. *Shudder*

[Anonymous]

Has she stopped streaming her fundraisers? I haven’t seen anything for weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

They are real people who deserve the same rights as others. You don’t care if they lose their lives and liberty.

Yes, you have just as much right to your body as I do to mine. Does that include vaccines or is it "That's different!"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has she stopped streaming her fundraisers? I haven’t seen anything for weeks.

She should have time to make some more content after the election.

[Anonymous]

It's amazing that Republicans are still pushing on this even after their girl Lauren Boebert gave a handjob to some dude who wasn't her husband in a crowded movie theater full of kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's gonna lose. Her poor kids will never be able to live this down. Imagine going grocery shopping and everyone knows this about you.

I feel bad for her but at the same time she CHOSE to run for office and should have known that online sex tapes were gonna be used against her. She tried to have her cake and eat it too. Shows a serious lack of judgement and David Owen is inoffensive R.

A poll came out showing her 11 points down which is just bleak. Nearly 80% of voters are aware of the scandal as well.

+1 but I don't feel bad for her at all. What kind of truly stupid person would do this?

But her response has been to claim she and her husband are the victims here.

Are they victims?

You can say that they should have known better, but technically they were victimized. Someone recorded without their consent and then distributed it.

They had no reasonable expectation of privacy when they self published their live streams, FIFTEEN TIMES. They have no case. I would still vote for her if I was in her district bc I’m worried about abortion laws. But she and her husband are both idiots.

Yes, they were idiots for doing it and for not thinking people would record without their consent.

I’ll take a harmless idiot over a monster who wants to take away my rights and who wants to hurt LBGTQ kids.

That's the spirit! Vote for my candidate, a harmless idiot.

Vote for the candidate who will protect women and LGBTQ.

I guess if you’re homophobe misogynist then she’s not the candidate for you.

Ah, the false, binary choice argument. Got anything else?

Either you want to protect women’s right or you don’t. It’s not complicated.

So, you're a single issue voter. I am too.

So, you don’t value women’s autonomy. Noted.

Women have no special, privileged status that makes them exempt from the government's laws and regulations.

They are real people who deserve the same rights as others. You don’t care if they lose their lives and liberty.

Yes, you have just as much right to your body as I do to mine. Does that include vaccines or is it "That's different!"?

No one physically forced you to get a vaccine. You wouldn't be charged with a crime if you didn't get one. F off.